VOTE: Restrict Resigning of Recently BO Player?

[jackdaniels]

Yes close it.

It's 1 Vote per GM not team.

Ripper

And I say anyone with a name that starts and ends with the same letter cannot vote.

[SlackJack]

And I say anyone with a name that starts and ends with the same letter cannot vote.

[Jonathan]

I hate this loophole as much as any, but it does add uniqueness to the league. I will just split and let the rest of the league decide.

Caps - no
Oilers- yes

[Tarheels55]

Canucks say No

[papps]

Flyers say no

[izaman3]

I don't think we should actually be voting until we know what we are voting on.

Are we eliminating buyout discounts?
Are we saying the a GM can't buyout a player and then rebid on him?
Are we putting a time limit on when a GM can rebid on their own bought out player?

How do we plan on closing the loophole? I think that makes a big difference.

[PsychoticPondGoons]

say No man! No man. NO!
Needless tinkering.

[PsychoticPondGoons]

say No man! No man. NO!
Needless tinkering.

are on side with the smart owner of the Hawks.

NO from Columbus.

[SlackJack]

I don't think we should actually be voting until we know what we are voting on.

Are we eliminating buyout discounts?
Are we saying the a GM can't buyout a player and then rebid on him?
Are we putting a time limit on when a GM can rebid on their own bought out player?

How do we plan on closing the loophole? I think that makes a big difference.

The vote is political theater. A Yes vote continues the conversation. A No vote puts it off again until next year.

[PsychoticPondGoons]

I don't think we should actually be voting until we know what we are voting on.

Are we eliminating buyout discounts?
Are we saying the a GM can't buyout a player and then rebid on him?
Are we putting a time limit on when a GM can rebid on their own bought out player?

How do we plan on closing the loophole? I think that makes a big difference.

The vote is political theater. A Yes vote continues the conversation. A No vote puts it off again until next year.

Sounds about right.
I think it's a none issue.

As for whether it's realistic or not. Hey we're playing in fantasyland here so as long as it's not limited to some owners it shouldn't be flagged as a problem.

That's how I see this.