Author Topic: Rules Discussion  (Read 3864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2011, 07:53:31 AM »
As long as I am being picky on rules, I am going to go a little bit into your play-off system (as I never really looked at it until now)... Why are we having 8 team play-offs with 9 team divisions? Seriously, just about ANYONE can make it in despite having a .500 winning percentage. We want to test our skills as much as possible, and how are we suppose to do it when 90% of the teams make the play-offs in each division.

I have two proposed systems:
 8-) System One  8-)
6 teams in each conference makes the play-offs. The top teams in each conference will be distributed across the top 3 seeds, and the last 3 spots will be wild cards, going out to the next top 3 teams (despite their division).

Week 1: 3 plays 6, 4 plays 5, 1 and 2 get byes.
Week 2: 1 plays lowest remaining seed, 2 plays second lowest remaining seed
Week 3: Winner of Week 2 play each other
Week 4: Conference winners battle for the CUP!

Pros: It gives a little more breathing space when it comes to making the play-offs while rewarding the GMs who worked hard to build a winning team. This will also reward competitive divisions, thus creating the possibilities of making a trade in your division a little deadly (like the real NHL).

 :afro: System Two  :afro:
4 Teams in each conference make the play-offs. The first three seeds will go to division winners while the final remaining spot (THE Wild Card) goes to the highest remaining seed in the conference.

Week 1: 1 plays 4, 2 plays 3
Week 2: Winners of Week 1 play each other
Week 3: Conference winners play each other for the CUP

Pros: We make the cut to the play-offs REALLY cut throat, thus increasing the competition in each division. We also add another week to the regular season, which will possible give us another week of trades and difficult decisions to make.

---------------------------------------------------------

I really like this league, but I HATE the play-off system you currently hold. I know you want to make this as close to the real NHL as possible, but 8 team play-offs in 9 team divisions is leaving no punishment for error or inconsistency. The NHL can do it because they have 15 teams in each division; while we only have 18 teams in the league period.

I honestly would hate to be the 1st seed and lose to an 8th seed that has more losses than wins on his record, as that would make my entire regular season look like a waste of time. So I say lets raise the stakes and cut the number of play-off contending teams down.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2011, 08:36:36 AM »
These systems are great. I could not agree more.  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2011, 11:46:53 AM »
I totally agree that we have to find a way so what I did with Ryan Ellis doesn't happen and we have to find a way so that we can resign guys we sign to a 1 year contract I like that rule that the contract has to be the same or more. 

I think we should take votes on new rules too
This will be solved next season. For now no 1 year contracts
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #33 on: March 04, 2011, 11:52:53 AM »
As long as I am being picky on rules, I am going to go a little bit into your play-off system (as I never really looked at it until now)... Why are we having 8 team play-offs with 9 team divisions? Seriously, just about ANYONE can make it in despite having a .500 winning percentage. We want to test our skills as much as possible, and how are we suppose to do it when 90% of the teams make the play-offs in each division.

I have two proposed systems:
 8-) System One  8-)
6 teams in each conference makes the play-offs. The top teams in each conference will be distributed across the top 3 seeds, and the last 3 spots will be wild cards, going out to the next top 3 teams (despite their division).

Week 1: 3 plays 6, 4 plays 5, 1 and 2 get byes.
Week 2: 1 plays lowest remaining seed, 2 plays second lowest remaining seed
Week 3: Winner of Week 2 play each other
Week 4: Conference winners battle for the CUP!

Pros: It gives a little more breathing space when it comes to making the play-offs while rewarding the GMs who worked hard to build a winning team. This will also reward competitive divisions, thus creating the possibilities of making a trade in your division a little deadly (like the real NHL).

 :afro: System Two  :afro:
4 Teams in each conference make the play-offs. The first three seeds will go to division winners while the final remaining spot (THE Wild Card) goes to the highest remaining seed in the conference.

Week 1: 1 plays 4, 2 plays 3
Week 2: Winners of Week 1 play each other
Week 3: Conference winners play each other for the CUP

Pros: We make the cut to the play-offs REALLY cut throat, thus increasing the competition in each division. We also add another week to the regular season, which will possible give us another week of trades and difficult decisions to make.

---------------------------------------------------------

I really like this league, but I HATE the play-off system you currently hold. I know you want to make this as close to the real NHL as possible, but 8 team play-offs in 9 team divisions is leaving no punishment for error or inconsistency. The NHL can do it because they have 15 teams in each division; while we only have 18 teams in the league period.

I honestly would hate to be the 1st seed and lose to an 8th seed that has more losses than wins on his record, as that would make my entire regular season look like a waste of time. So I say lets raise the stakes and cut the number of play-off contending teams down.
We will probably be going with the 4 team format, like a comparison to baseball playoffs. I didn't really give this much thought when writing up the rules because I knew we wouldn't be playing playoffs this season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Jesselton

  • Guest
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #34 on: March 07, 2011, 10:20:50 PM »
We will probably be going with the 4 team format, like a comparison to baseball playoffs. I didn't really give this much thought when writing up the rules because I knew we wouldn't be playing playoffs this season.

I personally have to disagree with the thought of going to a 4 team per conference playoff format. The baseball playoff format doesn't even suit baseball, it's awful. I say go with the 6 team per conference format. It's much better suited to a hockey league.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jesse

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5617
  • Bonus inPoints: 29
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :COL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOT:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #35 on: March 07, 2011, 10:34:27 PM »
I personally have to disagree with the thought of going to a 4 team per conference playoff format. The baseball playoff format doesn't even suit baseball, it's awful. I say go with the 6 team per conference format. It's much better suited to a hockey league.

I agree even baseball is expanding their playoffs. I don't think we should have 8 teams as that is too many 6 sound perfect.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:COL-NHL:

GO AVS GO

:COL-NHL:

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Rules Discussion
« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2011, 10:36:34 PM »
I agree even baseball is expanding their playoffs. I don't think we should have 8 teams as that is too many 6 sound perfect.
Ok I am down for that too
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: I dont mean to bruise anyone's vagina. I cant help myself. Im a habitual vagina bruiser. Sincerely.
    Yesterday at 02:11:08 PM
  • OUDAN: Imagine lying to all of us like that lollll\
    Yesterday at 03:48:54 PM
  • Daddy: Up yours Danno :rofl:
    Yesterday at 04:16:28 PM
  • OUDAN: Hahaha
    Yesterday at 04:22:07 PM
  • Daddy: Takes a certain kind of guy to even do dynasty and unfortunately many of them are.. umm "sensitive" is a good word. I am a lot of personality, but im very good at what i do. I might suck at everything else but in dynasty fantasy i am ELITE.
    Yesterday at 04:29:57 PM
  • Daddy: As both an owner & moderator. It im ok letting you know about it.
    Yesterday at 04:30:41 PM
  • Daddy: Its ok to be diverse. Dont chat
    Yesterday at 04:31:36 PM
  • Daddy: Close the chat and just run your team.
    Yesterday at 04:31:59 PM
  • Daddy: In dynasty fantasy i have the Mamba mentality and there are others like me.
    Yesterday at 04:33:49 PM
  • Daddy: You own a baseball team for ten years and get mad you have to throw 35 innings pitched. In a week. Of baseball. Da fuq? No. Get out. Dont want you.
    Yesterday at 04:36:25 PM
  • Daddy: Fuq u been doing? Try art or some Crap. Take up painting. Ten years you cant field a starting rotation? Da fuq is you illiterate?
    Yesterday at 04:38:27 PM
  • Daddy: PLAYSTATION/XBOX = EA Sports (its in the game! :) )
    Yesterday at 04:40:06 PM
  • Daddy: The rest of you join my big mouth ass and lets play ball.
    Yesterday at 04:41:03 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey fan much [link] NHL LIVE is fantasy hockey on illegal substances. Just like NFL/MLB LIVE it offers a unique perspective on "modern day" fantasy sport experience.
    Yesterday at 05:27:47 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE owners here are your spreadsheets [link] you can see your Franchises, your availability cap, your RFAs, all of it. Make your plans. Talk yo talk. Be ready.
    Yesterday at 05:50:15 PM
  • STLBlues91: I will be around the rest of the night. I will finish correcting 5 spreadsheets and then they all should match. I am officially on summer vacation
    Yesterday at 06:35:36 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to YURmom. The first female of LIVE as its only female LIVE GM. Thats a keeper @Mt_Crushmore! :toast:
    Yesterday at 09:23:01 PM
  • Daddy: #Chicks dig da dynasty
    Yesterday at 09:24:43 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to all actively bidding in the Nico Hoerner sweepstakes! [link] MLB LIVE never sleeps.
    Yesterday at 09:29:27 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to @jmntl82 [link] congratulations on your first of many LIVE trades.
    Yesterday at 09:31:14 PM
  • Daddy: Well damn.. congratulations on your second trade in the last fifteen minutes. :rofl: Bartender i will have what he's having.
    Yesterday at 09:37:13 PM
  • IndianaBuc: I’ll have a double.
    Yesterday at 09:38:53 PM
  • jmntl82: Stay tuned, we're building something over here in Detroit
    Yesterday at 09:43:10 PM
  • Brent: PM sent Detroit
    Yesterday at 09:51:02 PM
  • Rhino7: Bartender pour me another :toast:
    Yesterday at 09:56:30 PM
  • Daddy: We are building something. In every sport. Non stop. Its what we do.
    Yesterday at 10:11:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yup, sometimes people dont see the vision. Sometimes the vision Fricks up. You dont know till the chips are cashed in
    Yesterday at 10:12:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I once traded a full draft class 1-7, an additional 1st, 3 offensive flyer players for what player you might ask?
    Yesterday at 10:13:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: WR Jalen Reagor lmaaooo  :rofl:
    Yesterday at 10:14:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And won my first chip that same season. Reagor starting in the flex scoring 9 points
    Yesterday at 10:14:39 PM
  • jmntl82: How did the other team finish?
    Yesterday at 10:16:01 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: It was dallas. I think he missed the playoffs that year. Then used the draft picks on the 2021 class. Every pick was the 32nd pick (dont remembee what the other 1st became)
    Yesterday at 10:18:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Idk if anyone remembers the 2021 class but it was weak on offense outside or the top 10-15. I dont regret the deal just learned and move on. As long as you have assets, you can mold your build how you want. Picks are usually the most valuable asset because most gms want in on a draft.
    Yesterday at 10:19:34 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The results of that draft class is here [link]
    Yesterday at 10:20:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Every 32 overall pick dallas makes in each round came from that trade
    Yesterday at 10:20:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The 2024 and 2025 classes look much more promising than that one lol
    Yesterday at 10:22:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: 2021 draft class was my worst class as a NFL Live gm. my 2022 and 2023 were better
    Yesterday at 10:32:52 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I think it was the worst for most of us. It was a bad class overall. The top was amazing tho
    Yesterday at 10:42:05 PM
  • jimw: Etienne is amazing. He was near the top of that draft lol
    Yesterday at 11:18:42 PM
  • Brent: I got Nico Collins at 26.
    Yesterday at 11:20:10 PM
  • Daddy: You can use his bat n glove.
    Yesterday at 11:41:35 PM
  • dbreer23: I'm having issues trying to access league SS using Google Sheets. Anyone else having problems?
    Today at 12:32:38 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: :beer:
    Today at 12:42:14 AM
  • Daddy: Which league SS
    Today at 12:56:47 AM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE Buzz... "Tomas Hertl has just purchased land in the Delaware Valley. His agent suggests he loves Cheesesteaks
    Today at 01:30:45 AM
  • dbreer23: All league SS
    Today at 01:55:17 AM
  • dbreer23: which sucks bc I am headed out of town again tomorrow.
    Today at 01:55:29 AM
  • dbreer23: I'll be back on Monday to get things back in order in all leagues.
    Today at 02:00:12 AM
  • Daddy: Its local on your end @Dan
    Today at 02:06:12 AM
  • Daddy: I can see them all.
    Today at 02:06:47 AM