Author Topic: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12  (Read 1895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:55:26 PM »
Here's a list of teams that were around ...but not really... in 2011-12:

in order of least involved
1. :NJD: New Jersey Devils
This team used up 2 owners, went thru 3-4 mths without an owner in-season, yet owned RNH + Marty. Under the previous owners, the team almost lost MiLR RNH to free agency due to inactivity... yet another case to bar non-hockey ppl or ones with limited hockey knowledge from such a deep league. A new owner is in place for the 2012-13 season.

2. :CLS: Columbus Blue Jackets
Blue Jackets had 1 owner but they appeared to be absent most of the time or busy with other leagues (college hoops + football). This team has found a new active owner for the 2012-13 season.

3. :CHI-NHL: Chicago Blackhawks
Hawks burned thru 2 owners each of whom kind of managed half a season but were not involved in trades nor the FA market. a case of non-hockey ppl owning a team. They did manage to trade away the likes of Hossa, P.Kane + Lecavalier in return for Korpikoski, Grabner, J.Campbell, N.Thompson, Little, B.Boyle before abandoning the team.

4. :STL-NHL: St.Louis Blues
This team went almost 3 months without an owner to start the season after the previous one abandoned the league for his preferred sport, basketball. Jonathan took over before the mid-point of the season but sat tight with a somewhat depleted roster appearing to wait for the 2012 Free Agent period to begin. Hovering at 42m in team salary for almost all of 2011-12, and even to this day, not sure which way the team's headed but i know the owner's a shrewd dealer and the team would be competitive if they chose to be active.

5. :VAN: Vancouver Canucks
Corey's a super active profsl admin + mgr, commish of 12 leagues, chat room guy, but losing MiLR player Cody Hodgson and not resigning pending FA's means they are destined to finish at the bottom of the pack again despite having some great players on their roster and a bunch of goalies.


Other teams in the Top 10...
6. :COL-NHL: - mostly invisible after the season started after signing a ton of prospects to their MLR during the off-season. CapnCally appears to be turning things around in COL.
7. :ANA: - prior to RSnakeR, they had been left unattended for a couple of month by NickF. cloud91 is leading the way and has been busy during the off-season.
8. :MON-NHL: - prior to Tarheels55, this team was relatively inactive due to a high team salary and a decent roster. BeanTown is now on board and looking to turn things around and rebuild this team.
9. :DET-NHL: - had/has somewhat active managers who didn't/don't work the system to benefit their team.
10. :CAR-NHL: - lost 2 MiLR players that had surpassed the 40-games played limit.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 04:05:16 PM by Corey »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2012, 01:44:56 PM »
 
Quote
but sat tight

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 01:53:12 PM »

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?

who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 01:56:18 PM by PigsRule »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 02:10:52 PM »
in the defense of Jonathan, a glut of money in FNHL doesnt really do you any good during our FA unless you are willing to over spend for any average to star players.   I still have lots of money but similar to Brian Burke I refuse to pay the crazy amounts to players.

Had I known , what I know now , I wouldnt have let some of the players I let go to FA , go to FA.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 03:19:26 PM »
who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
Do you really think I just let guys like Backes and Pietrangelo walk? That was a result of a dead owner, for multiple years as far as I can see. That is the only way you get FA money here, be dead for a long time. You can't make trades with no assets. I wasnt moving landy or schwartz or coyle and never will. I got something for Kane, but I honestly thought he was not that great, or worth the money. I got some future RW and Turris back. Rangers had intended on keeping him, hence why they gave up guys, guess he forgot. I got a bunch of offers for bad contracts and me giving up prospects, but there is no need for a team that has no chance to win now.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cheesesteak

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 1760
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 04:34:37 PM »
What's the purpose of calling out 1/3 of the league and pointing out their weaknesses when most of these owners aren't even here any more?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

BeanTown

  • Guest
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2012, 05:01:58 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Founder
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2012, 05:59:33 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

I agree.  This is one of the few leagues like this at ProFSL.  However, pointing out these franchises' issues with activity can lead to a focus on redemption.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Corey

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2012, 07:27:40 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

Totally agree. Because I chose not sign FA because there was noone there to over spend means Im a bad owner.

And with topic, the topic about trade offers, we wonder why there is high turnover.

Look no further than this thread.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jackdaniels

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 2384
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • just hand me the bottle!
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :BostonCollege:
    • :NYRB:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2012, 11:53:13 PM »
I thought it was an interesting post to read. Is it a coincidence most of those teams finished at the bottom of the league.

The Jersey team I took over this Summer will be making a push for the postseason if there's an NHL season. Glad we're already ranked number one on someone's list. :rofl:

One thing's for sure, Corey being the commissioner of 12 leagues is insane.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win: 2016-17 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:
:win: 2013-14 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM