Author Topic: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12  (Read 1877 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:55:26 PM »
Here's a list of teams that were around ...but not really... in 2011-12:

in order of least involved
1. :NJD: New Jersey Devils
This team used up 2 owners, went thru 3-4 mths without an owner in-season, yet owned RNH + Marty. Under the previous owners, the team almost lost MiLR RNH to free agency due to inactivity... yet another case to bar non-hockey ppl or ones with limited hockey knowledge from such a deep league. A new owner is in place for the 2012-13 season.

2. :CLS: Columbus Blue Jackets
Blue Jackets had 1 owner but they appeared to be absent most of the time or busy with other leagues (college hoops + football). This team has found a new active owner for the 2012-13 season.

3. :CHI-NHL: Chicago Blackhawks
Hawks burned thru 2 owners each of whom kind of managed half a season but were not involved in trades nor the FA market. a case of non-hockey ppl owning a team. They did manage to trade away the likes of Hossa, P.Kane + Lecavalier in return for Korpikoski, Grabner, J.Campbell, N.Thompson, Little, B.Boyle before abandoning the team.

4. :STL-NHL: St.Louis Blues
This team went almost 3 months without an owner to start the season after the previous one abandoned the league for his preferred sport, basketball. Jonathan took over before the mid-point of the season but sat tight with a somewhat depleted roster appearing to wait for the 2012 Free Agent period to begin. Hovering at 42m in team salary for almost all of 2011-12, and even to this day, not sure which way the team's headed but i know the owner's a shrewd dealer and the team would be competitive if they chose to be active.

5. :VAN: Vancouver Canucks
Corey's a super active profsl admin + mgr, commish of 12 leagues, chat room guy, but losing MiLR player Cody Hodgson and not resigning pending FA's means they are destined to finish at the bottom of the pack again despite having some great players on their roster and a bunch of goalies.


Other teams in the Top 10...
6. :COL-NHL: - mostly invisible after the season started after signing a ton of prospects to their MLR during the off-season. CapnCally appears to be turning things around in COL.
7. :ANA: - prior to RSnakeR, they had been left unattended for a couple of month by NickF. cloud91 is leading the way and has been busy during the off-season.
8. :MON-NHL: - prior to Tarheels55, this team was relatively inactive due to a high team salary and a decent roster. BeanTown is now on board and looking to turn things around and rebuild this team.
9. :DET-NHL: - had/has somewhat active managers who didn't/don't work the system to benefit their team.
10. :CAR-NHL: - lost 2 MiLR players that had surpassed the 40-games played limit.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 04:05:16 PM by Corey »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2012, 01:44:56 PM »
 
Quote
but sat tight

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 01:53:12 PM »

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?

who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 01:56:18 PM by PigsRule »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 02:10:52 PM »
in the defense of Jonathan, a glut of money in FNHL doesnt really do you any good during our FA unless you are willing to over spend for any average to star players.   I still have lots of money but similar to Brian Burke I refuse to pay the crazy amounts to players.

Had I known , what I know now , I wouldnt have let some of the players I let go to FA , go to FA.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 03:19:26 PM »
who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
Do you really think I just let guys like Backes and Pietrangelo walk? That was a result of a dead owner, for multiple years as far as I can see. That is the only way you get FA money here, be dead for a long time. You can't make trades with no assets. I wasnt moving landy or schwartz or coyle and never will. I got something for Kane, but I honestly thought he was not that great, or worth the money. I got some future RW and Turris back. Rangers had intended on keeping him, hence why they gave up guys, guess he forgot. I got a bunch of offers for bad contracts and me giving up prospects, but there is no need for a team that has no chance to win now.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cheesesteak

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 1760
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 04:34:37 PM »
What's the purpose of calling out 1/3 of the league and pointing out their weaknesses when most of these owners aren't even here any more?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

BeanTown

  • Guest
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2012, 05:01:58 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Founder
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2012, 05:59:33 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

I agree.  This is one of the few leagues like this at ProFSL.  However, pointing out these franchises' issues with activity can lead to a focus on redemption.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Corey

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2012, 07:27:40 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

Totally agree. Because I chose not sign FA because there was noone there to over spend means Im a bad owner.

And with topic, the topic about trade offers, we wonder why there is high turnover.

Look no further than this thread.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jackdaniels

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 2384
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • just hand me the bottle!
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :BostonCollege:
    • :NYRB:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2012, 11:53:13 PM »
I thought it was an interesting post to read. Is it a coincidence most of those teams finished at the bottom of the league.

The Jersey team I took over this Summer will be making a push for the postseason if there's an NHL season. Glad we're already ranked number one on someone's list. :rofl:

One thing's for sure, Corey being the commissioner of 12 leagues is insane.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win: 2016-17 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:
:win: 2013-14 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: I remember GMU, Butler, FGCU
    Today at 08:53:47 PM
  • Rhino7: Where do we sign up for nba live?
    Today at 09:00:48 PM
  • Daddy: Im going to post it
    Today at 09:01:14 PM
  • Daddy: But I will be editing it with team information on the fly
    Today at 09:01:32 PM
  • Rhino7: Ok
    Today at 09:01:35 PM
  • Daddy: Ive already got a lot to enter manually
    Today at 09:01:45 PM
  • Daddy: im posting it in just a sec
    Today at 09:02:06 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] SIGN UP
    Today at 09:03:45 PM
  • Daddy: Im updating it. Its a lot more information coming
    Today at 09:04:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: awesome
    Today at 09:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: Please list a college affiliate with your sign up
    Today at 09:04:29 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: done and done thx again
    Today at 09:06:10 PM
  • Rhino7: Got it, thanks
    Today at 09:07:37 PM
  • Rhino7: Minor league team too?
    Today at 09:08:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: can two teams have same college?
    Today at 09:17:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nevermind u have great edit skills
    Today at 09:18:27 PM
  • Braves155: I'll be interested to see who takes a few overlooked teams
    Today at 09:21:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i went homer
    Today at 09:23:10 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: wasnt gonna pass both up
    Today at 09:23:18 PM
  • Braves155: Clippers are listed 2x
    Today at 09:24:15 PM
  • Braves155: Brooklyn is missing
    Today at 09:26:33 PM
  • Daddy: Thanks guys, youre the best. But...im updating the sheet in real time, hand typed and adding information as I go.
    Today at 09:52:20 PM
  • Daddy: I appreciate all of your assistance. :rofl:
    Today at 09:52:43 PM
  • Daddy: Daddy: Im going to post it Today at 08:01:14 PM Daddy: But I will be editing it with team information on the fly Today at 08:01:32 PM
    Today at 09:53:51 PM
  • Daddy: Give me a few and I will link the final version, I havent looked at the replies yet.
    Today at 09:58:09 PM
  • Daddy: I was looking up G League team names which I never knew all 30 before today :rofl:
    Today at 09:58:55 PM
  • Daddy: There is actually more than 30. Expansion must be on the horizon.
    Today at 09:59:49 PM
  • Daddy: Isnt the NBA going back to Seattle?
    Today at 10:00:20 PM
  • IndianaBuc: That would be awesome
    Today at 10:02:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i dunno abt that
    Today at 10:15:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but an expansion is deff up there
    Today at 10:15:33 PM
  • Daddy: Seattle is getting the Sonics back I think
    Today at 10:16:02 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: [link]
    Today at 10:16:14 PM
  • Daddy: I think two more teams are coming 32 teams total
    Today at 10:16:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that link ^ talks abt expansion
    Today at 10:16:49 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah Vegas is getting one
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: not anytime soon
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: prolly in another 3 4 yrs
    Today at 10:17:16 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas is getting everything by the time its said and done.
    Today at 10:17:23 PM
  • Daddy: If there is demand we will expand ourselves. To hell with waiting for the NBA. We can put franchises in Vegas & Seattle and have a 32 team league.
    Today at 10:18:34 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas GM can pick his own team name
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its already getting an mlb team now
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • Daddy: So shall it be
    Today at 10:18:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: so thats 3/4 major sports
    Today at 10:19:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlb nhl and nfl
    Today at 10:19:04 PM
  • Daddy: Im opening up the Seattle Super Sonics! Lol...we bout to shake Crap up.
    Today at 10:19:51 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas Powerballs? We need to come up with something that makes the city of Vegas say hmmmm. I bet we can.
    Today at 10:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: The Las Vegas Ignite (i dig this)
    Today at 10:30:51 PM
  • Brent: The Las Vegas Gamblers
    Today at 10:49:05 PM
  • STLBlues91: If  someone wants chicago I dont mind taking over Las Vegas as well
    Today at 10:49:06 PM