* Franchise NHL


Author Topic: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)  (Read 5426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ripper

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 3030
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :MichiganState:
    • :NUD:
    • View Profile
Let's have a discussion about buy-outs.

If you bid on a player, win him then buy him out......

You should not be able to use an exemption and essentially win back the player at a reduced salary.

I would like to see a time added (30 days) before you can even bid on a released player.

We need to correct the rule to make this a better league.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline izaman3

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5279
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2014, 03:29:10 PM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2014, 03:39:00 PM »
Keep in mind that the buy-out rules are purposely forgiving. The aim is to 1) prevent franchises from being burdened with crippling contracts and 2) to replenish the free-agency pool. If as a result GM's are able to wiggle out tough contracts I think it's all well and good.

That said a couple minor stipulations might help. Not sure what a 30 day clause would do, but what about one that stated something to the effect that all new contracts must be honoured for the season they were signed in? In other words, new contracts would be ineligible for buy-out until their second year. Fair?

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2014, 03:45:06 PM »
30 days clause is specifically so you cannot buyout someone, then start bidding on them. I am fine either way honestly, if the rule changes, everyone will just be buying guys out, while the sale lasts. I am sure every GM has a list.


Here is another idea,

if you buyout a player, and then win that player back, then the original contract is restored. I like that. Loophole is closed.

Although, you could argue this rule makes the league unique and why it still exists.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2014, 03:54:26 PM by Jonathan »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2014, 03:53:03 PM »
30 days clause is specifically so you cannot buyout someone, then start bidding on them. I am fine either way honestly, if the rule changes, everyone will just be buying guys out, while the sale lasts. I am sure every GM has a list.

True about the sell offs. I suppose a 30 day restriction would help assuming other GM's get in on the free-agent. Wasn't looking at it with that in mind but see now it works. (Except that it would be a hassle to track. Far simpler to say that if you buy a player out, you can't rebid on same. Period. )
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2014, 03:56:40 PM »
Can we call it the Sean Avery rule?

Even though I am obviously the biggest offender and it may surprise you, but I am entirely for that change.  I think its a total cop out, but I am definitely going to use it while I can.

As with Hutch I full well knew someone would bid him.. I just went the 22 to get the market to where I needed it without a bunch of pussy footing. 
« Last Edit: October 15, 2014, 03:58:47 PM by snugerud »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline izaman3

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5279
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2014, 03:58:47 PM »
Can we call it the Sean Avery rule?

Even though I am obviously the biggest offender and it may surprise you, but I am entirely for that change.  I think its a total cop out, but I am definitely going to use it while I can.

 :iatp:

haha,  :rofl:

Snug I'm totally for you using it while its available. I almost used it a couple times and then didn't, but maybe I might if the rule is going to change soon. But I think it something we talk about and change for the future.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2014, 04:01:55 PM »
Can we call it the Sean Avery rule?

Even though I am obviously the biggest offender and it may surprise you, but I am entirely for that change.  I think its a total cop out, but I am definitely going to use it while I can.

As with Hutch I full well knew someone would bid him.. I just went the 22 to get the market to where I needed it without a bunch of pussy footing.

and I only bid on him b/c I knew if it didn't work out, I could do same thing. Also, I only have Lehtonen, and if he goes down, I am toast.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2014, 04:09:26 PM »
As long as he doesnt get sent to the minors your ok...

I had it all figured out that at the 5.5 , I could buy him out again at the .66  and lump it all into this year.

I had actually offered a 4th round pick to about 8 different GMS to trade and have them buy him out so that I could use the buy out /discount option at the 5.5 rate, but couldnt get anyone to bite. 

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: DISCUSSION: Same owner Team A Drops Team B bidding (Jay Harrison)
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2014, 04:27:19 PM »
30 days clause is specifically so you cannot buyout someone, then start bidding on them. I am fine either way honestly, if the rule changes, everyone will just be buying guys out, while the sale lasts. I am sure every GM has a list.

if you cant see me I am rubbing my hands together and licking my chops for people to start buying out their players!! I got money in the bank and would love for that to happen. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM