Author Topic: Scoring Categories  (Read 18261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #130 on: December 01, 2009, 11:56:14 PM »
I suggest we change over to the new scoring system as soon as possible for contract extensions.

Agreed.  No one anticipated this, so any gain/loss from this is completely by chance and should be considered part of the game (not like market conditions don't change in MLB).  No special clause to help owners that might need to pay more now, no money back for those who would have saved if they waited.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #131 on: December 02, 2009, 09:28:30 AM »
Agreed.  No one anticipated this, so any gain/loss from this is completely by chance and should be considered part of the game (not like market conditions don't change in MLB).  No special clause to help owners that might need to pay more now, no money back for those who would have saved if they waited.

I completely agree except that the people with the pending extensions will receive the better choice since they fell in limbo.

Now, with OF defensive statistics... I say we just assign a constant amount for each inning they play on defense (if that is available) or game played and then add for assists and subtract for errors.

Utility will have no defense.  I'll have to test this out on my select group which includes players such as Albert Pujols (awesome hitter, great defense), Raul Ibanez (good hitter, poor defense) and Pedro Feliz (poor hitter, solid defense).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #132 on: December 02, 2009, 01:40:13 PM »
I updated the scoring system, and I ended up tweaking the defensive settings and multiplying all of the batting stats by 150%, so everything on the hitters side stayed in Bill James fashion with the pitchers.  I believe if you view all hitters, you will see just their batting stats as field stats apply on a per-position basis.  One thing I had to do was make the catcher fielding stats as dry as the outfield thanks to the likes of Victor Martinez (1B), Pablo Sandoval (3B), and Kurt Suzuku (DH). 

I am still doing some slight tweaks as we speak.  You'll see Mauer and A-Rod lower than expected, but keep in mind that this is points-based, so their time on the DL means they earned 0 points in such periods.  A useful sorting stat is the Fantasy Points per Game.  I would like everyone on the RC look for oddities and outliers and give comments on how this looks.  We may always be tweaking this year-to-year, but I am not worried about that now so much as egregious differences in points.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #133 on: December 02, 2009, 01:53:21 PM »
I looked at the top-50 batters per fantasy points per game, and everything looks pretty reasonable except for Joe Mauer.  You'll see Runs Created Per Game in parenthesis.  He is the only batter outside of Pujols that has over 0.9 RC/G.  Why isn't he in the top three?  Mauer hit mostly singles, but it has to be something more than this.  Is it the defensive points that he is losing out on?

Top 50 Batters
25.9 - Pujols, Albert - STL (0.943)
24.9 - Fielder, Prince - MIL (0.859)
24.2 - Teixeira, Mark - NYY (0.816)
24 - Braun, Ryan - MIL  (0.836)
23.8 - Lee, Derrek - CHC  (0.818)
23.8 - Youkilis, Kevin - BOS  (0.804)
23.7 - Utley, Chase - PHI (0.787)
23.6 - Ramirez, Hanley - FLA (0.823)
23.4 - Jones, Garrett - PIT  (0.784)
23.3 - Jeter, Derek - NYY (0.778)
23.3 - Howard, Ryan - PHI (0.771)
23.3 - Votto, Joey - CIN (0.802)
23.2 - Beltran, Carlos - NYM  (0.774)
23.1 - Rodriguez, Alex - NYY (0.759)
23.1 - Suzuki, Ichiro - SEA  (0.778)
22.9 - Choo, Shin-Soo - CLE  (0.745)
22.9 - Gonzalez, Adrian - SD (0.733)
22.8 - McCutchen, Andrew - PIT (0.725)
22.8 - Ramirez, Manny - LAD (0.732)
22.7 - Dunn, Adam - WAS  (0.721)
22.7 - Lind, Adam - TOR (0.758)
22.7 - Bay, Jason - BOS (0.73)
22.6 - Mauer, Joe - MIN (0.916)
22.6 - Cabrera, Miguel - DET (0.756)
22.4 - Holliday, Matt - STL (0.733)
22.4 - Delgado, Carlos - NYM (0.723)
22.3 - Sandoval, Pablo - SF (0.752)
22.3 - Helton, Todd - COL  (0.724)
22.3 - Span, Denard - MIN  (0.683)
22.3 - Reynolds, Mark - ARI  (0.701)
22.2 - Upton, Justin - ARI  (0.727)
22.2 - Pena, Carlos - TB (0.673)
22.2 - Sizemore, Grady - CLE (0.643)
22.2 - Young, Michael - TEX (0.728)
22.1 - Coghlan, Chris - FLA (0.709)
22.1 - Morneau, Justin - MIN (0.69)
22.1 - Branyan, Russell - SEA (0.676)
22.1 - Zimmerman, Ryan - WAS (0.7)
22.1 - Werth, Jayson - PHI  (0.692)
22.1 - Scutaro, Marco - TOR (0.654)
22.1 - Damon, Johnny - NYY (0.697)
22 - Figgins, Chone - LAA (0.659)
22 - Zobrist, Ben - TB  (0.725)
21.9 - Weeks, Rickie - MIL (0.681)
21.9 - Hill, Aaron - TOR  (0.68)
21.9 - Ruiz, Randy - TOR  (0.742)
21.9 - Pedroia, Dustin - BOS (0.668)
21.8 - Roberts, Brian - BAL  (0.67)
21.8 - Berkman, Lance - HOU  (0.676)
21.8 - Tulowitzki, Troy - COL (0.703)
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

mjmezzetti

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #134 on: December 02, 2009, 03:45:46 PM »
If you post the latest spreadsheet I'll take a look to see if anything jumps out at me.  You mentioned you upped the hitting stats 150%, I imagine this depreciates pitching statistics/values?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #135 on: December 02, 2009, 04:08:57 PM »
If you post the latest spreadsheet I'll take a look to see if anything jumps out at me.  You mentioned you upped the hitting stats 150%, I imagine this depreciates pitching statistics/values?

I didn't even base it off of the spreadsheet anymore except that the original spreadsheet was reflecting heavy defensive points because of the 1B bias (1000+ points for Pujols on DEF), so to keep everything in line with Bill James' ratios, I increased the hitting.  This actually kept everything much more balanced between Batting, Fielding, and Pitching no matter which range of players you look at.  You'll be able to view all of the updated scoring on Fantrax.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #136 on: December 02, 2009, 07:07:08 PM »
As you may know, you should be reviewing the scoring system on Fantrax.  Now ended up being a good time to do it because Fantrax ranking algorithm changed.

The problem that I personally face is a contract extension that I have to give to Aubrey Huff.  According to the old rankings, I was going to give him $6m.  I traded for this RFA from Baltimore knowing this.  The new rankings say he was the 9th best CI in 2008 (he had a good season) and is due some $14.5m.  I fall into the pending contract extension phase that a few others do, but my situation is a bit unique as I traded for an RFA.  Under the rules, I am forced to sign Huff, but now his value doubled.

We seem to all agree on the pending extensions that they will receive the lower value from each system.  I think I should be allowed to sign Huff to a 1-year $6m deal per the old rankings, but I want to have the scoring finalized first.

As we discussed over PM, Fantrax has already stated there is no way to go back or even view the old rankings.  Options will have to be given to GMs who are involved in pending extensions.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

clidwin

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #137 on: December 02, 2009, 07:26:23 PM »
you are definatly right! I think you should be grandfather in. So you should have the right with the old ranking. But we need to see if anyone else is under this problem.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #138 on: December 02, 2009, 07:30:50 PM »
you are definatly right! I think you should be grandfather in. So you should have the right with the old ranking. But we need to see if anyone else is under this problem.

I am the only one with an RFA that has to be signed.  I am sure there are some GMs who were waiting to sign players at their prices until after some trade talks, but there is nothing that we can do for them.  Chad, what did you think of the scoring system?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

clidwin

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #139 on: December 02, 2009, 08:13:38 PM »
That scoring system is way out of my league. I believe how you did it is the closest to what we are looking for. And if it was up to me, I dont know a person like you colby that finds info. and researches the info any better then you. So what I read on this Rules Committee Page is the best around for Fantasy Baseball!! And thats another reason, I really enjoy this league!  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: In what league?
    June 06, 2024, 11:14:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent you are a vet. Your skills will carry over.
    June 06, 2024, 11:14:54 PM
  • Daddy: Stats, age, contract, google.
    June 06, 2024, 11:15:12 PM
  • Daddy: You will be a playoff team just because you're one of the best "Dynasty Fantasy" GMs mother Earth has birthed.
    June 06, 2024, 11:16:11 PM
  • Daddy: I personally would welcome the challenge of learning an entirely new sport within the confounds of dynasty fantasy arena. Its fun and if you dont win at first so what.
    June 06, 2024, 11:17:50 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, that's why I took on the challenge.  I'll learn and figure out how I want to build this Predators team.
    June 06, 2024, 11:19:20 PM
  • Daddy: I like the Preds
    June 06, 2024, 11:19:43 PM
  • Daddy: You will love NHL LIVE i guarantee it. Wait till those bullets start getting fired.
    June 06, 2024, 11:20:30 PM
  • jmntl82: Kings are in the same boat, NHL is a new landscape for me to traverse
    June 06, 2024, 11:46:36 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 p!
    June 06, 2024, 11:48:57 PM
  • indiansnation: pm
    June 06, 2024, 11:49:03 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys rumor flying that their might be a new hockey league coming out.Major League Hockey (MLH) is determined to be the next big thing in the sport. Looking to launch in the fall of 2024, MLH is looking for early star power to give their league some buzz and legitimacy.
    Yesterday at 12:17:21 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:34:39 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlh is a 3 v3 version of nhl
    Yesterday at 12:35:42 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:36:49 AM
  • Daddy: They will go bankrupt after the first year :rofl: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:38:58 AM
  • Daddy: I bet this was Sidney Crosby's idea.
    Yesterday at 12:42:22 AM
  • Daddy: Fantrax offers the following options that support LIVE format Dynasty Sports.... Soccer, NASCAR, PGA, & believe it or not Formula One.
    Yesterday at 03:24:02 AM
  • Daddy: We are providing every other option across the 4 major sports.
    Yesterday at 03:25:10 AM
  • Daddy: If there is a demand. #LIVE will meet it. Site traffic is climbing. Site membership. Reputation. Interests. Its far from where it could be.
    Yesterday at 03:27:02 AM
  • Daddy: We are providing something nobody else is providing. Once these teams are gone... Grown Men throw public fits trying to get in. Yo... I aint lying.
    Yesterday at 03:29:02 AM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around all day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 01:45:38 PM
  • Daddy: NBA talking expansion now :rofl: multiple groups bidding in Las Vegas and Seattle's legislation has already approved a team once the Kraken came in.
    Yesterday at 06:49:07 PM
  • Daddy: Imagine that :rofl: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 06:49:28 PM
  • Daddy: They looking at 2 years before expansion. But its coming. Vegas has like 5 groups two of which plan to break ground on new venues. The expansion fee is expected to be north of 5 Billion $$
    Yesterday at 06:51:25 PM
  • Daddy: We did it here first. Remember that in two years when the NBA steals our Vegas name too ;)
    Yesterday at 06:52:13 PM
  • Rhino7: We need a royalty payment if they steal the Vipers name
    Yesterday at 08:54:14 PM
  • Daddy: Blues hasnt said he wants to keep that name.
    Yesterday at 10:35:01 PM
  • Daddy: He is taking this naming very seriously which i appreciate.
    Yesterday at 10:35:49 PM
  • Daddy: It has to be a blast being a new expansion team in an NBA Dynasty league.
    Yesterday at 10:36:19 PM
  • Daddy: Who has ever done that?
    Yesterday at 10:36:41 PM
  • STLBlues91: I have a list of names on my phone currently
    Yesterday at 10:36:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: May do a poll or something for the gms of the league
    Yesterday at 10:37:01 PM
  • Daddy: Vipers is ok but it doesn't say "Vegas" to me. There are more creative names to be sure.
    Yesterday at 10:39:01 PM
  • Daddy: I don't know that the other GMs will care so much as you or I. :)
    Yesterday at 10:39:49 PM
  • Alpha5: Las Vegas Realtors
    Yesterday at 10:40:23 PM
  • Daddy: Sure, throw some in the chat :rofl:
    Yesterday at 10:41:02 PM
  • dbreer23: Vegas Rat Pack
    Yesterday at 10:42:39 PM
  • Daddy: I like the Las Vegas Diamonds but i was saving that one for MLB LIVE expansion.
    Yesterday at 10:42:41 PM
  • STLBlues91: Legacy/Jokers/Sinners/Vengeance/Outlaws/Vipers/Vandals/Voodoo/have more but just threw out a couple I have written down
    Yesterday at 10:44:14 PM
  • Daddy: Las Vegas Diddlers (shout out to Bad Boy Records)
    Yesterday at 10:45:06 PM
  • Alpha5: Dammit
    Yesterday at 10:49:15 PM
  • Alpha5: Haha
    Yesterday at 10:49:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Las Vegas Impersonators
    Yesterday at 10:51:19 PM
  • Daddy: That long fuqn name? It would rap around they jerseys like a hula hoop.
    Yesterday at 10:52:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you play for dawg?
    Yesterday at 10:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: "Uh.... We the imgddyojgsspersonators"
    Yesterday at 10:54:26 PM
  • Alpha5: Lolol
    Yesterday at 11:47:00 PM
  • Rhino7: Las Vegas Sin
    Today at 12:27:33 AM
  • STLBlues91: Im around for the next few hours to talk any deals
    Today at 01:53:58 AM