Author Topic: AFB Trade Committee  (Read 873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Re: AFB Trade Committee
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2012, 12:26:58 PM »
To elaborate on the "other options for a TC," I'd been considering trying to form an external TC. It may be a coalition of members from various leagues reviewing all trades, or it may be just for special cases (such as appeals). In any case, having members with no self-interest in this league would obviously be best.

However, that's just thinking aloud. I don't know how much interest there is, how practical it is and how it would work logistically. Just started looking for leagues similar to ours others out there. The other leagues would have to have a roughly similar setup for this to work well (salaries, minors) and of course, they would have to want a similar system as well.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9987
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: AFB Trade Committee
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2012, 08:47:11 AM »
In the other league I am in, they have a pretty successful setup with an internal committee that works pretty well. It is small, five guys. I think if you handpicked the people on the committee, maybe even providing some basic guidelines, an internal committee could work. Just my experience, not necessarily an endorsement of an internal committee.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

DVB78300

  • Guest
Re: AFB Trade Committee
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2012, 04:55:13 PM »
I'd like to volunteer

Below is a rough idea of how trade voting is done in another league that I am in and well it's worked well since league inception.


A single post from each voter containing their vote and reasoning for that vote. Commissioners may post announcements when deemed necessary. If the trade unfairly favors the posting team, vote positively (+.) If the trade unfairly favors the confirming team, vote negatively (-.) All votes must include a grade from -100 to +100, using this scale as a guideline:

+/- 0-10: Completely even trade, or a problem-free trade that may slightly favor either side in the opinion of the voter.
+/- 10-25: One side does maintain a substantial advantage in the deal, but in the opinion of the voter the trade should not come under question as veto-worthy or close to it.
+/- 25-39: The advantage obtained by one side is potentially dangerous and may hurt the other side if similar deals are made in the future. It is not deemed vetoable by the voter but might be by other voters.
+/- 40-49: The trade is definitely dangerous and the voter maintains that veto consideration should be given, however it is not veto-worthy in the eyes of the voter.
+/- 50-69: The trade is considered vetoable by the voter, but perhaps certain aspects of the deal make sense. Perhaps the losing team will be able to recover from their error.
+/- 70-89: The trade makes little sense for one side from various aspects i.e. talent, financials, current/future direction. The trade should definitely not be allowed and poses a real threat to the league.
+/- 90-99: The trade is among the worst trades conceivable. No sound arguments can be made in its favor, in the eyes of the voter.
+/- 100: The worst trade conceivable, i.e. Starlin Castro ($400,000) for John Lackey ($15,000,000.)

If after 48 hours there have been at least 5 votes, and the average grade has an absolute value of 50 or above, the trade will be vetoed. If all of the first five, or five of the first six votes fall inside {-25...+25}, the trade will be automatically processed even if the 48-hour period is not up. Owners will not vote on their own trades.

TRADE REVIEW GUIDELINES:
* In your reasoning, you may not personally attack an owner, or even make blatantly disparaging remarks about an involved player, such as "Varitek is garbage/sucks/pathetic, etc."
* Contacting voters via email, PM or otherwise concerning their vote is prohibited.
* Changing of votes is discouraged. Within the casting of the first five votes, a voter may change his vote up to FIVE points (+/-) OR to fall within +/- 25, as long as they give good reason. After the fifth vote is cast, changing votes is no longer allowed. Think it through before posting.
* One post per trader or voter per thread, so there will be no arguing back and forth. Make your point, and let the process work itself out.
* What you are voting on is not whether or not one team is getting the better end in your opinion, but whether the trade threatens the integrity or longevity of the league, or might be a part of a pattern to do so. Take into account past, current, or changing markets, former costs, and team direction(s) at your discretion.
* Player production now, in the future, salaries, cap space situations, contract lengths, and arbitration clocks are all factors that should be weighed in various degrees while making your review.
* When weighing the fair value of a draft pick, an estimation of the player available at that draft pick should be used.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Re: AFB Trade Committee
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2012, 05:24:42 PM »
Thanks for the input Doug. For now, I'd like to use a simpler system though.

We will go with this http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=46583.0 . We will modify this as necessary.

All that have volunteered have been invited to the TC.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Shelby

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 4114
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NYJL:
    • :IND-NBA:
    • :SJ:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: AFB Trade Committee
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2012, 05:51:48 PM »
Add me to TC
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: NHL watch a bitch. All those dudes. I know about guys playing hockey in Iceland now. Too much information.
    Yesterday at 05:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Yesterday at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Yesterday at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Yesterday at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Yesterday at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Yesterday at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Yesterday at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Yesterday at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Yesterday at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Yesterday at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Yesterday at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: @Daddy can you check the message I just sent. Quick question
    Yesterday at 09:14:25 PM
  • Daddy: Replied
    Yesterday at 09:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: If members do not mind, deleting old pms helps the site run smoother and keeps your pms organized.
    Yesterday at 10:07:23 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gets more pms than i do. I stay deleting and still have pages and pages of pms
    Yesterday at 10:08:11 PM
  • Daddy: Its not required that you delete old news but its also not required you delete and spam emails. Same thing. Thanks!
    Yesterday at 10:09:35 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone wants one of these premium Flyers prospects, send me more pms to eventually delete. NFL/MLB/NHL you're welcome. On to the next LIVE chapters.
    Yesterday at 10:11:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Thank you for the Prune message sections.
    Yesterday at 10:20:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp that was an easy axe of messages
    Yesterday at 10:53:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I did happen to select 225 pages before I saw that option though
    Yesterday at 10:55:07 PM
  • Daddy: Man you had 225 pages? Damn. Im down to 12.
    Yesterday at 11:48:59 PM
  • Daddy: Some of them i have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:49:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I had 465 but I clicked 225 pages worth of messages before I found the prune option
    Yesterday at 11:50:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats a ton of trade talks. You just recently became a moderator. Being a mod we communicate tons via pm.
    Yesterday at 11:50:51 PM
  • Daddy: Your 465 pages was 400+ of trade negotiations. In pages containing 20 threads each. . :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:52:00 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I talk a lot of players and deals
    Yesterday at 11:52:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: And the other 65 were draft reminders and otc messages
    Yesterday at 11:52:50 PM
  • Daddy: I bet you pruned some moderator Crap :rofl: some of them you have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:52:59 PM
  • Daddy: I always resend the important stuff.
    Yesterday at 11:53:35 PM
  • STLBlues91: No I kept all messages within like 80 days
    Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah you got it all anyway. Im just here to type and plug in numbers
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: There is a new NCAA football team. TCU in the house.
    Yesterday at 11:54:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: When does NCAA open and all that
    Yesterday at 11:55:15 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE just added another all star level GM. We are getting him up to speed. No not the one in Detroit.
    Yesterday at 11:55:31 PM
  • Daddy: July 1st
    Yesterday at 11:55:43 PM
  • Daddy: Where are we at? Somewhere around 50 teams i think. We have 64 but bringing them onboard profsl is a challenge.
    Yesterday at 11:56:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Ill get to work more on that spread sheet like June 10th. Finishing touches on NHL then a few days off then will knock that out
    Yesterday at 11:56:47 PM
  • Daddy: So much easier. No contracts. No trades.
    Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
  • jmntl82: I can’t stand the Detroit GM
    Yesterday at 11:59:19 PM
  • jmntl82: Keeps me up at night
    Yesterday at 11:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah the colors will take a bit as I find the rbg codes and thats 64 teams. I can copy and paste the makeup. Then just to plug in the players
    Today at 12:07:48 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Is he taking over the jags team?
    Today at 12:20:40 AM
  • Daddy: Jags have two owners
    Today at 12:24:18 AM
  • Daddy: @Vik has been put on wait list and has already been replaced. The GM directory is updated.
    Today at 12:25:13 AM
  • Daddy: This owner is in Carolina.
    Today at 12:25:40 AM
  • Daddy: iRunFreeman recruited from off-site.
    Today at 12:27:44 AM
  • Daddy: Weve probably got 20 or so people that we just have to get on profsl then get them up to speed on how we post because everything is old school here
    Today at 12:29:27 AM