0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
How exactly does this process work? On what basis can you veto a trade?
I agree with Roy this is effectively a transfer fee.
While I do not have any issues with financial muscle being used to obtain a player, I think the points have been raised are correct and there is to me a clear distinction between sending salary paid with a player, taking on a bad contract (the usual source of financial muscle playing out in a trade) and just sending large sums of cash. I agree with Roy this is effectively a transfer fee.While cash considerations so sometimes get transferred between teams, multi year cash balances to make a trade happen do not. I would support a rule that supports the payment of a players salary but not excessive cash considerations.ps daddypadre don't feel we're ragging on you, this is I think the first time this has come up and needs to be debated out.