Author Topic: Rule Change Discussions  (Read 3237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2016, 02:57:53 AM »
Just out of curiosity, is the league experiencing major problems from this "tanking" situation? Like real life, are teams not being competitive purposely so they can compete later?

In real life a team still has to be fielded.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2016, 07:14:31 PM »
One more thing I wanted to discuss is the DL.  Right now we can only place people on the DL that are on the MLB 60 day DL.  I think this is flawed.  MLB teams only place people on the 60 day when they need to clear 40 man roster space, it really doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the severity of the injury.  Right now, if a player is out for the season in our league he cannot be put on the DL unless the corresponding MLB org puts him on the 60 day DL.  I think we should change this.  If a player is out for the year in our league he should be allowed to placed on the 60 day DL.  The only caveat I would add is that once you add someone who is declared out for the season to the 60 Day DL he cannot be reinstated for that season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2016, 11:58:53 PM »
I tried to tighten up some of the signing rules so they're easier to read.  Please look them over.

Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=131562.0

International Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=159576.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9975
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2016, 12:57:52 AM »
Every league that has a DL requires the player to be out on the DL by the MLB team.  Why are we trying to change basic rules?  Who is going to make the determination that the player is out for the season?  or do we then lose the 60 day DL for those who are going to be out less than the rest of the season? 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2016, 01:44:59 AM »
As someone who has had I think 7 or 8 different players go on and/or off the 60day DL at some point this season I don't like the idea of a player on 60day DL must be on it all year. A lot of those players on the 60day DL come back mid year from TJS from previous year and now you are telling me I either need to hold a roster spot for those 7 or 8 guys all year or commit to not playing them even as they spend half a year playing in real life.

That said I see the problem Chris is pointing out and agree it is a legitimate problem. Case in point, Jordan Walden took up a roster spot on my team for about 15 months while being injured before the real life Cards decided to Move him from 15 to 60day DL.

So, while I agree there is a problem I don't agree with the proposed solution.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2016, 04:45:43 PM »
Well we could tell someone is out for the year when the team says the player is out for the year.  This happens all the time.  Players who have surgeries or break bones are sometimes left on the 15 day DL but are listed out for the year. 

The 60 day DL is a function of 40 man roster spots in MLB, it's not a function simply of the length of time someone is going to be injured. 

I'm simply proposing, in addition to the 60 man DL, that players who have been declared out for the year can be placed on the DL in our league but would not be allowed to return to active status that year.  This won't affect 60 day DL players at all, it's merely an add on for players out for the season.  You wouldn't have to place him on the DL and lose him for the year, it would just be an option.  It makes no sense that a player out for the year can't be placed on our DL because his real life MLB team just has him on the 15 day DL. 

Either way, it's not a big deal.  Just something I felt was a hole in our rules. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2016, 01:41:15 AM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 01:42:56 AM by chrisetc21 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2016, 01:20:13 PM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m

Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2016, 03:42:18 PM »
Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers

They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2016, 10:32:52 PM »
They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/

Would it not be better to use baseball pro since that's where our ARB numbers come from?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: PM Billy
    Today at 12:32:28 PM
  • Daddy: Nice trade boyz (Jim/Brent) congratulations to you both!
    Today at 12:48:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Jim yo ass is an amazing baseball GM. Football must not be your sport. Watching you build these Cardinals from scratch is high high level gm Crap. Keep doing ya thing.
    Today at 12:58:17 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: meant to say night not nightmare lol
    Today at 02:11:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: hows everyone doing
    Today at 02:11:58 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB :toth:
    Today at 02:31:18 PM
  • Daddy: I sent Brian a trade offer on profsl, he cussed me out via text and told me to stop smoking so much marijuana :rofl:
    Today at 02:32:51 PM
  • Rhino7: So by winning NCAAF you are guaranteed a team, do you boot someone to make room or what? I’m just speaking as if all GMs were actually active.
    Today at 03:09:13 PM
  • Daddy: In my experience there is always "someone" that should be booted. They dont get booted because most leagues struggle at filling membership. NFL LIVE is so popular i could legit have an NFL LIVE 2 and it would be filled instantly.
    Today at 03:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: Doing that would diminish what NFL LIVE is. Which is why we created NCAA. NCAA supports those wanting an NFL LIVE franchise but cannot get in because we have franchise "holding" GMs.
    Today at 03:14:31 PM
  • Daddy: A "holding" GM is barely active. Never has a chance to win it all and responds to pms from peers after weeks or even months.
    Today at 03:15:24 PM
  • Daddy: If someone wins a 64 team LIVE league. NCAA or not. As hard as it is to win a LIVE league. And we gave all 32 NFL LIVE GMs the chance to win that very same league. Then hell yes. If need be. Some 2-15 GM or likewise that we KNOW isnt doing all they can to get better will be in jeopardy of being replaced.
    Today at 03:17:41 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: essentially this is a feeder for the NFL NBA. gives gusy a chance to prove they can be active and at least do whats needed so that they are considered for nba and nfl live leagues
    Today at 03:19:29 PM
  • Daddy: These leagues arent created and paid for so people can hold them and not do Crap. The purpose is to have the best Dynasty GMs in the world test themselves on an even and realistic playing field. You win a LIVE league. You are a made Man. Period.
    Today at 03:19:48 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB exactly. They are feeder leagues.
    Today at 03:20:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: with it being 64 ppl the talent pool for possible replacmenets is high
    Today at 03:21:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: and gives you enough to assess
    Today at 03:21:13 PM
  • Daddy: The NCAA League concepts are much simpler. No trading in college. Its recruit, set lineups and go. But the recruiting is essential to winning. A dummy wont win. No dummy will ever win LIVE. Cant luck into it.
    Today at 03:23:24 PM
  • Daddy: And
    Today at 03:23:29 PM
  • Daddy: Im in those leagues. Nobody wins a league im in by luck. They either had some kind of headstart or advantage. But talk smack if you want, if youve been in a league with me, you know wassup. Im bringing the hammer win lose or draw.
    Today at 03:24:52 PM
  • Daddy: Win a LIVE League. You beat me fair in square. Win NFL/NBA LIVE you not only beat me, you beat @jwalkerjr88 and my Son is even better than me. (Damn)
    Today at 03:27:58 PM
  • Daddy: And youve beaten the 30 best other guys i could get.
    Today at 03:28:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: yeah cann tell you this in nfl live u were not easy to beat
    Today at 03:31:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but the one time i did was in the nfc championship
    Today at 03:32:08 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent,@OUDAN,@Rhino7,@IndianaBuc,@STLBlues91,@DaveW,@ldsjayhawks,@LockednLoaded & his Sons,@Harman,@BAB the list goes on and on and on. Look at those GMs. @kylerap@Sky@indiansnation look at the hockey guys, the basketball guys signing up.
    Today at 03:33:02 PM
  • Daddy: We playin games (dynasty fantasy) but we aint playin no games when it comes to competition and winning. WE DA BEST. Its not hype. Its not talk
    Today at 03:34:10 PM
  • Daddy: Its fact
    Today at 03:34:18 PM
  • Daddy: If ol jwalkerjr88 were in MLB LIVE he wouldn't be tolerating that Canadian Dirty Bird Crap. Someone needs to stop Toronto.
    Today at 03:43:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im coming
    Today at 03:44:15 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: for mlb
    Today at 03:44:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that team is now in great position like nfl i s
    Today at 03:44:37 PM
  • Daddy: I see ya. You take crap teams and turn them into contenders in one or two years. You are ELITE at this Crap.
    Today at 03:46:08 PM
  • Daddy: If a person wins NCAA LIVE or NCAA hoops LIVE & they arent in NFL or NBA LIVE, they will be.
    Today at 03:47:23 PM
  • Daddy: If they want to be.
    Today at 03:48:16 PM
  • Daddy: LIVE Champions are VIP in my book. They get whatever they want. Ask Buc.
    Today at 03:48:50 PM
  • Daddy: Guys like @Braves have nothing to worry about. That guy is pitting in the work. He has the room to learn at his own pace.
    Today at 03:50:20 PM
  • Daddy: Those GMs that are just "holding" teams. They know who they are.
    Today at 03:50:53 PM
  • Daddy: Get busy trying to win or get busy on your PlayStation or some other Crap.
    Today at 03:51:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: the only team that still needs more work is ccd
    Today at 03:54:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its getting theee
    Today at 03:54:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: there
    Today at 03:54:33 PM
  • jimw: @Daddy thanks for the baseball complement, but don't sleep on the Seahawks. I got Stroud and Bijan in draft and have lots of picks
    Today at 04:02:59 PM
  • Brent: Those are two studs for sure.
    Today at 04:06:51 PM
  • Daddy: @JimW agreed. You have acquired big chips to have a seat at the table.
    Today at 04:10:08 PM
  • Daddy: LIVE was created so GMs can cook. Show your talent in this space. Lots of people talk :blah: and there are a lot of leagues and sites out there. Aint none of them got our product. Are you a good fantasy GM? A great one? Why? What made you good/great?
    Today at 04:16:10 PM
  • Daddy: Cuz you won a couple leagues full of non competitive dudes or inactive teams? Duplicate teams where guys run more than one franchise eliminating true balance? How do you KNOW you're good?
    Today at 04:17:36 PM
  • Daddy: I guess because you say so.
    Today at 04:17:48 PM
  • Daddy: No need to prove it. Live in your own space where you are King. Like Franchise mode on your XBox.
    Today at 04:19:53 PM
  • Daddy: You da man on franchise mode i bet
    Today at 04:20:13 PM
  • Daddy: So... Why are you here
    Today at 04:22:14 PM