Author Topic: Rule Change Discussions  (Read 3236 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2016, 02:57:53 AM »
Just out of curiosity, is the league experiencing major problems from this "tanking" situation? Like real life, are teams not being competitive purposely so they can compete later?

In real life a team still has to be fielded.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2016, 07:14:31 PM »
One more thing I wanted to discuss is the DL.  Right now we can only place people on the DL that are on the MLB 60 day DL.  I think this is flawed.  MLB teams only place people on the 60 day when they need to clear 40 man roster space, it really doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the severity of the injury.  Right now, if a player is out for the season in our league he cannot be put on the DL unless the corresponding MLB org puts him on the 60 day DL.  I think we should change this.  If a player is out for the year in our league he should be allowed to placed on the 60 day DL.  The only caveat I would add is that once you add someone who is declared out for the season to the 60 Day DL he cannot be reinstated for that season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2016, 11:58:53 PM »
I tried to tighten up some of the signing rules so they're easier to read.  Please look them over.

Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=131562.0

International Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=159576.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Online ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9973
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2016, 12:57:52 AM »
Every league that has a DL requires the player to be out on the DL by the MLB team.  Why are we trying to change basic rules?  Who is going to make the determination that the player is out for the season?  or do we then lose the 60 day DL for those who are going to be out less than the rest of the season? 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2016, 01:44:59 AM »
As someone who has had I think 7 or 8 different players go on and/or off the 60day DL at some point this season I don't like the idea of a player on 60day DL must be on it all year. A lot of those players on the 60day DL come back mid year from TJS from previous year and now you are telling me I either need to hold a roster spot for those 7 or 8 guys all year or commit to not playing them even as they spend half a year playing in real life.

That said I see the problem Chris is pointing out and agree it is a legitimate problem. Case in point, Jordan Walden took up a roster spot on my team for about 15 months while being injured before the real life Cards decided to Move him from 15 to 60day DL.

So, while I agree there is a problem I don't agree with the proposed solution.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2016, 04:45:43 PM »
Well we could tell someone is out for the year when the team says the player is out for the year.  This happens all the time.  Players who have surgeries or break bones are sometimes left on the 15 day DL but are listed out for the year. 

The 60 day DL is a function of 40 man roster spots in MLB, it's not a function simply of the length of time someone is going to be injured. 

I'm simply proposing, in addition to the 60 man DL, that players who have been declared out for the year can be placed on the DL in our league but would not be allowed to return to active status that year.  This won't affect 60 day DL players at all, it's merely an add on for players out for the season.  You wouldn't have to place him on the DL and lose him for the year, it would just be an option.  It makes no sense that a player out for the year can't be placed on our DL because his real life MLB team just has him on the 15 day DL. 

Either way, it's not a big deal.  Just something I felt was a hole in our rules. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2016, 01:41:15 AM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 01:42:56 AM by chrisetc21 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2016, 01:20:13 PM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m

Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2016, 03:42:18 PM »
Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers

They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2016, 10:32:52 PM »
They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/

Would it not be better to use baseball pro since that's where our ARB numbers come from?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • indiansnation: No resolution i just saw it. No rrsolution
    Yesterday at 05:49:02 PM
  • Daddy: Ok. You know you can cut anyone you want and with FROZEN FRENZY as well as the draft we all have a ton of moves to make.
    Yesterday at 06:11:32 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey players don't make what football, basketball, baseball players make. The cap is lower than other LIVE leagues.
    Yesterday at 06:13:00 PM
  • Daddy: NFL Teams in OTAs. Hockey & Baseball Drafts approach
    Yesterday at 06:14:26 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah when we were filling rosters we just included everyone we could since they can be cut. I will be cutting a chunk of guys once we start up
    Yesterday at 06:14:45 PM
  • Daddy: Trading too. Not just cutting. Virgin teams need diversified. Ive seen owners swap half of they're starting players to get diversified.
    Yesterday at 06:16:51 PM
  • Daddy: New leagues should be the most active because everyone has a ton of assets.
    Yesterday at 06:18:24 PM
  • Bigdon: Is there any openings in nfl.l8ve
    Yesterday at 11:09:21 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey bigdon if u looking to trade in mlb live let me know im guardians
    Yesterday at 11:24:50 PM
  • Bigdon: Well listen to all offers I need team in nfl live I am in all other leagues
    Yesterday at 11:31:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon pm sent u trade offer in mlb live
    Yesterday at 11:55:00 PM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon sent u new pm with new trade offer
    Today at 12:08:07 AM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon ill post trade right know
    Today at 12:13:33 AM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon trade posted in mlb live
    Today at 12:24:42 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: bigdon sent ya a message also i dont think nfl has any openings rn
    Today at 12:31:00 AM
  • indiansnation: Bayarea Ballers pm about giants in mlb live
    Today at 12:32:31 AM
  • Brent: Angels looking for a power bat in MLB Live.
    Today at 07:17:38 AM
  • Daddy: When i started on profsl in 2010 my first league i had to pay $45 for the Milwaukee Brewers in a start up league called SD.
    Today at 10:45:05 AM
  • Daddy: SD = Scouting Department
    Today at 10:45:26 AM
  • Daddy: Papps recruited me on our job. The only team available in a full and active money league.
    Today at 10:46:25 AM
  • Daddy: They vetoed my first 7 trade attempts. They publicly insulted me, calling me dumb, saying i should be kicked out the league because it was obvious i didnt know what i was doing.
    Today at 10:47:37 AM
  • Daddy: Im year 2 i won the championship and the prize pool. I would win it repeatedly afterwards.
    Today at 10:48:26 AM
  • Daddy: My Dad joined. Then these same fools said he was my burner account.
    Today at 10:48:56 AM
  • Daddy: When it was obvious he was someone else, they started saying we couldn't trade with each other or we were cheating.
    Today at 10:49:44 AM
  • Daddy: Profsl had a bunch of pencil dik crooks on it. All over the place. Corrupt LMs orchestrating trades to try to pre determine who won.
    Today at 10:50:57 AM
  • Daddy: To keep the money between "certain guys". That way it stayed in house and they just kept robbing fools.
    Today at 10:51:49 AM
  • Daddy: I created LIVE because LIVE is what those fake ass leagues were supposed to be.
    Today at 10:52:24 AM
  • Daddy: Real competition. Where your competition cant cheat ya and anyone that beats ya deserved to do so.
    Today at 10:53:15 AM
  • Daddy: All those bums & crooks & morons have either left profsl for good or they stay in the background, watching, and gossiping behind my back like a bunch of street corner hookers.
    Today at 10:54:41 AM
  • Daddy: Now all we do on profsl is play ball.
    Today at 10:55:51 AM
  • Daddy: How did i win a money league that they were cheating in? Because if you cheat, you still gotta be right about the players. They were smart at being crooks. Dumb at building teams.
    Today at 10:59:54 AM
  • OUDAN: I miss money dynasty lesgues
    Today at 11:27:47 AM
  • OUDAN: Ran correctly that is
    Today at 11:28:50 AM
  • Daddy: Agreed Dan. This site was popping 14 years ago with half ass product. Every league here today offers a unique top quality product.
    Today at 01:09:03 PM
  • Daddy: Upcoming $$$ league [link] Powerhouse Baseball @Alpha5 (LIVE moderator) LM.
    Today at 01:57:27 PM
  • OUDAN: Need a $$ basketball league badly
    Today at 02:58:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I finally finalized my first off-season trade in CCD
    Today at 03:17:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Trading away PJ washington
    Today at 03:18:02 PM
  • Daddy: @Dan Powerhouse is coming to all sports. 20 player redraft concept using LIVE style scoring.
    Today at 04:58:27 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse hockey 30 player & football 53 player redraft.... Basketball is 15 players i think but these are in concept stages except baseball. Powerhouse Baseball 2025 is coming.
    Today at 05:02:29 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse = $$$ & redraft.
    Today at 05:03:34 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE SS [link]
    Today at 06:25:27 PM
  • Braves155: Evening gents. Anyone up for trade talks?
    Today at 08:44:25 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Sure
    Today at 09:06:09 PM
  • Braves155: NFL LIVE - Speak my language if you are moving 1sts or early 2nds
    Today at 09:30:35 PM
  • Daddy: Have you seen that Man's team? If Buc had picks we would have no chance.
    Today at 09:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around for deals for a few hours for any leagues I am in.
    Today at 10:04:43 PM
  • STLBlues91: I just went through my MIA roster and think I only have 2-3 guys on offense from when I took the team 2 years ago. Lots of chaos and turnover
    Today at 10:07:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy pm
    Today at 10:48:32 PM
  • Bigdon: Any chance I well get a nfl live team
    Today at 10:54:00 PM