Author Topic: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read  (Read 670 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2016, 11:35:55 AM »
I contacted Fantrax about Derek Dietrich.  I wrote:

On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, phbb1954@gmail.com wrote:

League ID: kmkfzrq8ifjdypi3 (PREMIUM)
League Name (MLB 2016 Reg): Franchise GM 2016

Username: flash (Commissioner) (Member since Sep 23, 2010)

Name: Ernesto Quiroz
Email: phbb1954@gmail.com
Sent: Thu Aug 04 02:46:16 EDT 2016
Server: app3

We use the points rank for each player as the basis for our extensions.
This player, Derek Dietrich, MIA, has eligibility as a MI, CI, & OF. When
I look at his OF numbers, it says he is our 7th ranked OF with 2433.2
points and 1474 as a MI. The 1474 is listed on his team roster as his
fantasy points. Why is he listed as 2433.2 as an OF--is it a mistake.

This is their response:

No, not a mistake. When you select "OF", it scores him as an OF, and so forth.

Thanks,
Neil
The Fantrax Team

-----------------------------------------

With that, we are going to have to go with his #7 ranking for the purposes of contract extensions.  So, if you want to extend Derek Dietrich with the 60% rule, his extension will have to be $7.0m (2021).

I know this is not the answer you want, but it is the reality we have to deal with.  I can assure you that we are not trying to be unfair to you in this instance.  We all rely on the Fantrax scoring system and we utilize it for all scoring aspects in FGM.  We cannot disregard its data when we are assured by the Fantrax staff there is not an error. 

Please let us know how you want us to proceed.


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Daniel

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :LAL:
    • :LA:
    • :UCLA:
    • :LIV:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2016, 02:51:12 PM »
This is absolute BS. Can we remove his eligibility as OF or something? I don't even want him to play OF. How come his points are worth more as an OF? It is the same crappy stat line, and there is a serious issue with our scoring system if that stat line is ranked as #7 top OF.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Franchise GM: Toronto Blue Jays

Offline Daniel

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :LAL:
    • :LA:
    • :UCLA:
    • :LIV:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2016, 02:57:16 PM »
Also, he has only played 4 games as OF this season, so he will lose eligibility after the season. I do not see why I have to extend him based on the OF rank
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Franchise GM: Toronto Blue Jays

Offline jpmanchester

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1536
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LAG:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #13 on: August 04, 2016, 04:00:47 PM »
I might be piping in where I'm not wanted, but there is definitely something wrong with Fantrax or our league scoring settings. Dietrich has different pts values depending which position you pick, CI, MI, and OF are all different.

So I checked Forsythe on my team, his values are also different based on whether I choose MI or CI. So something is going on with different scoring values for different positions. If I knew this, I would've started him at whichever position is scoring more pts. This issue could be throwing the whole season's scoring off if it's for every multiposition player, and if those pts differences are reflected in weekly scoring.

I haven't checked the rules yet, but is scoring supposed to be different for hitters based on which position they play?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jpmanchester

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1536
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LAG:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #14 on: August 04, 2016, 04:08:01 PM »
Oh wow, my bad. I just read the rules and the fielding scoring is different for every position lol. Not sure how I missed that, but I'm going to have to re-think my whole lineup.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12554
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #15 on: August 04, 2016, 07:17:23 PM »
 It always has been different. Always helps to know the rules
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline jpmanchester

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1536
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LAG:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2016, 07:49:43 PM »
Lol, I spend half my time on this board in the rules, somehow missed the different fielding values though.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2016, 12:33:47 PM »
This is absolute BS. Can we remove his eligibility as OF or something? I don't even want him to play OF. How come his points are worth more as an OF? It is the same crappy stat line, and there is a serious issue with our scoring system if that stat line is ranked as #7 top OF.

Also, he has only played 4 games as OF this season, so he will lose eligibility after the season. I do not see why I have to extend him based on the OF rank

Extensions are computed based on all position eligibility.  Your declaration that you do not intend to use him as an OF is not really relevant.  The fact that he is currently OF eligible is something we cannot ignore or remove. 

The decision is yours:  Keep him with a contract extension at $7.0m (2021) -- or let him go to free agency.  You could also wait to see if he drops in rank so the contract extension is less.

The choice is yours.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Daniel

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :LAL:
    • :LA:
    • :UCLA:
    • :LIV:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2016, 11:55:44 AM »
I am not extending him now. He should drop rank now that he is playing less. Two questions though: How long after the season is the window to extend prospects? If he loses eligibility after the season (which he should the way it's going), can I extend him at the other positions as soon as the season is over?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Franchise GM: Toronto Blue Jays

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12554
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Jays moves -- TORONTO GM Please Read
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2016, 12:18:21 PM »
I am not extending him now. He should drop rank now that he is playing less. Two questions though: How long after the season is the window to extend prospects? If he loses eligibility after the season (which he should the way it's going), can I extend him at the other positions as soon as the season is over?

You have until midnight Eastern 9/26/16 to extend contracts. That is the end of our fiscal year; he would automatically become a FA so, no, he cannot be extended in the off-season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: You will see it in fantrax once it starts. We are at the "pre" signup stage. Just got the boards up.
    Yesterday at 04:50:52 PM
  • Daddy: Setting up leagues from scratch takes a little time. Took a few months to get NHL set up correctly and operational.
    Yesterday at 04:52:25 PM
  • Daddy: MLB & NFL were switch over leagues. They already had most of the structures in place. NHL is the first true LIVE league done from scratch.
    Yesterday at 04:53:51 PM
  • STLBlues91: When do you need Vegas name for NBA Live?
    Yesterday at 04:56:01 PM
  • Daddy: When i set up fantrax. Need the name and logo by then. Seattle was easy. Vegas we are on our own.
    Yesterday at 04:58:58 PM
  • Daddy: So by July 1
    Yesterday at 04:59:31 PM
  • Daddy: NBA is "easiest" of all of the leagues to set up and moderate.
    Yesterday at 05:00:09 PM
  • Daddy: NHL watch a bitch. All those dudes. I know about guys playing hockey in Iceland now. Too much information.
    Yesterday at 05:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Yesterday at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Yesterday at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Yesterday at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Yesterday at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Yesterday at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Yesterday at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Yesterday at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Yesterday at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Yesterday at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Yesterday at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: @Daddy can you check the message I just sent. Quick question
    Yesterday at 09:14:25 PM
  • Daddy: Replied
    Yesterday at 09:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: If members do not mind, deleting old pms helps the site run smoother and keeps your pms organized.
    Yesterday at 10:07:23 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gets more pms than i do. I stay deleting and still have pages and pages of pms
    Yesterday at 10:08:11 PM
  • Daddy: Its not required that you delete old news but its also not required you delete and spam emails. Same thing. Thanks!
    Yesterday at 10:09:35 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone wants one of these premium Flyers prospects, send me more pms to eventually delete. NFL/MLB/NHL you're welcome. On to the next LIVE chapters.
    Yesterday at 10:11:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Thank you for the Prune message sections.
    Yesterday at 10:20:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp that was an easy axe of messages
    Yesterday at 10:53:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I did happen to select 225 pages before I saw that option though
    Yesterday at 10:55:07 PM
  • Daddy: Man you had 225 pages? Damn. Im down to 12.
    Yesterday at 11:48:59 PM
  • Daddy: Some of them i have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:49:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I had 465 but I clicked 225 pages worth of messages before I found the prune option
    Yesterday at 11:50:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats a ton of trade talks. You just recently became a moderator. Being a mod we communicate tons via pm.
    Yesterday at 11:50:51 PM
  • Daddy: Your 465 pages was 400+ of trade negotiations. In pages containing 20 threads each. . :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:52:00 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I talk a lot of players and deals
    Yesterday at 11:52:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: And the other 65 were draft reminders and otc messages
    Yesterday at 11:52:50 PM
  • Daddy: I bet you pruned some moderator Crap :rofl: some of them you have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:52:59 PM
  • Daddy: I always resend the important stuff.
    Yesterday at 11:53:35 PM
  • STLBlues91: No I kept all messages within like 80 days
    Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah you got it all anyway. Im just here to type and plug in numbers
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: There is a new NCAA football team. TCU in the house.
    Yesterday at 11:54:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: When does NCAA open and all that
    Yesterday at 11:55:15 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE just added another all star level GM. We are getting him up to speed. No not the one in Detroit.
    Yesterday at 11:55:31 PM
  • Daddy: July 1st
    Yesterday at 11:55:43 PM
  • Daddy: Where are we at? Somewhere around 50 teams i think. We have 64 but bringing them onboard profsl is a challenge.
    Yesterday at 11:56:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Ill get to work more on that spread sheet like June 10th. Finishing touches on NHL then a few days off then will knock that out
    Yesterday at 11:56:47 PM
  • Daddy: So much easier. No contracts. No trades.
    Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
  • jmntl82: I can’t stand the Detroit GM
    Yesterday at 11:59:19 PM
  • jmntl82: Keeps me up at night
    Yesterday at 11:59:34 PM