Line-up Changes

[Tony]

Yes and everyone has to set up there lineups before the early game. I do understand the difference between the opinions. I personalty know and feel option 1 is more fair. We could go back and forth all day but what is the point. We are only 2 votes. Looks like #2 will win anyway because it does give people more options ,but it puts people at a disadvantage if they work Monday - Friday night shift. They cant make the changes all week like the others can.

 For example, If I did not have computer access and had Bernier and Quick and they are playing at home which would be a late game. I could not wait until game time to adjust who I would want. If you had them and computer access you get to choose before game time. That is a big disadvantage for me. If we both had to put in our lineups at 7pm or before then we take the same chance is all I'm saying. 

 

[Drew]

I say that option #1 is most fair. Everyone has a set deadline to submit rosters, it is the same for everyone and if you do have a goalie that is iffy to play that day look at the team he is playing. Say for Schneider and Luongo, say Vancouver is playing Detroit well then Luongo is your goalie if they are playing Florida well there is a good chance Schneider will be in. Also you can set you line-ups for a whole week on 1 day if you want.
Option #2 is for the more hardcores. We search for announcements on starts, gametime injuries, etc. Which makes it more likely for us to get more points (me, Jesse, Tony) who spend more time on here.

I say for the general masses option #1 is the fairer option.

[Tony]

I say that option #1 is most fair. Everyone has a set deadline to submit rosters, it is the same for everyone and if you do have a goalie that is iffy to play that day look at the team he is playing. Say for Schneider and Luongo, say Vancouver is playing Detroit well then Luongo is your goalie if they are playing Florida well there is a good chance Schneider will be in. Also you can set you line-ups for a whole week on 1 day if you want.
Option #2 is for the more hardcores. We search for announcements on starts, gametime injuries, etc. Which makes it more likely for us to get more points (me, Jesse, Tony) who spend more time on here.

I say for the general masses option #1 is the fairer option.

[Drew]

Reset votes to zero due to this being done in February. Making sure only current GMs are voting.

[Tony]

that is a good idea because some votes were made by past GMs as well.

[winter]

Option #1 is the most fair.  Although I'm on checking player news and reports daily , Left Wing Lock, and so on and so on, everybody would have the same deadline!

[favo_zomg]

Option one just makes the most sense... With due diligence, you will know if the player is game or not. That and as winter said, it gives everyone the same deadline, which makes life easier on the commissioner.

[Jesse]

yeah but we don't get that info on the west coast that early in the morning you can't even figure out who got hurt the night before until 9:30 am. I don't know what its like on the east coast where its the day is half over by the time the puck drops for the first game. I would prefer option 3 even as long as I can figure out who is even playing as it stands right now I have to set my lineups a day early to make the deadline which isn't fair at all. 

[Jesselton]

I like and voted for #2, but #1 will probably win. Either way is fine in my books.

[Tony]

I wish we could do #2 but is not the most fair option for everyone. IMO