0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chris,I am good with your post. I do need to say that prior to coming to profsl, I was in a league on proboards where we had league wide vote, it was not a good setup. Trades took forever to process and people teamed up against trades. Better people here. I am fine with change, but not a fan of league wide vote.
A side note, in New Era we use a league wide. We have done that for about 2 years now. The league has 20 members and 5 vetoes kills the trade. During the offseason it is tough to get votes tho, during the season no real issue. My only advice would be to have a person designated to send a league pm when I trade is posted
Something needs to be done here. We need the commish to step in and come up with a plan. There is a trade sitting on the board for five days now with two votes. If the TC doesn't have time or won't vote we need to get rid of it. I am for a league wide panel of votes. I know there are pros and cons to this but the activity in this league has been getting worse and worse and I know its frustrating a few other owners in here. I understand that people are busy as am I which is why it makes more sense to get to league wide. Maybe it will drum up more activity. At the very least if a TC member doesn't vote within 72 hours of a trade then their vote no longer counts. We need to do something. I know its the offseason but trades that sit on the board hold up other potential moves. We have had some good ideas in here, we need to get some changes going.
I'm in this boat. Just need to make sure TC understand parameters for vetoing. "You could've gotten more" isn't a good reason. With varying salaries and caps and prospects in a league like this there are a lot of factors to consider other than strictly the talent involved so trades are very specific to a team's roster construction or owner's future plan. So trades should only be vetoed on what looks like extreme negligence or collusion IMO.