0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I really want to give the ProFSL TC a try. It would be a benefit to multiple leagues as it would streamline a lot of activity. For those interested, feel free to apply at the new ProFSL TC boards on the main index.
i agree with you Colb
I think whatever changes are made should go through the RC. I also think it would be a good idea to let other leagues test out the TC if they're interested and FGM can check back in 6 months to a year to see if it would be a good improvement for us to also use it. I personally don't think so, but at least this way we'll have some real evidence to make a decision from rather than our best guesses.
Well said. I think that any major changes to the league should be run through the rules commitee. Why have a rules committee if we are not going to use them when making major changes to the league. I also don't quite understand why the sudden urge to change the TC when it seemed to be working. I am all for improving the system if it really needs to but to change this just because a few trades were vetoed doesn't seem to make sense. I also don't really like the idea of taking the TC out of the league. I feel like the people in the league would have a better understanding of the league and what the teams making the trades are trying to accomplish. It would be alot of work for people outside of the league to fully understand FGM and then do the research into looking at both teams and the scoring of the league and how this impacts the trade. I would like to see the TC in FGM continue in its current form through the end of the year. I would also like to see the RC discuss the TC and decide if the process needs to be overhauled completely or just minor tweaks done to make it better. I am not in favor of outsourcing the TC at all. I also like the idea of supplying new GM's with a mentor in the league to show them the ropes and help them better understand the league.