Show Posts
231
Franchise NHL / Re: DISCUSSION: Supplemental Draft ELC value determination
« on: April 18, 2019, 04:51:28 PM »
The opinon of the Vancouver GM
Is that MiLR players should be allowed to be dropped and then re-supplement picked if that GM wants to, but then that player has to be automatically signed to roster contract.
As stats in the MiLR rules: Once a player is removed from the MiLR they are ineligible to return to the MiLR.
The player contract should be league minimum, unless the said player has previously been drafted in the FNHL draft, then that player undergoes the same rules as of the ELC Contract Value.
All GM's are responsible to check if said player was drafted in the FNFL Entry Draft, as this is easily done seeing as all the drafts have a link in the rules page. Therefore not putting further work on PR and PPG.
You can always just put the player on a 1 year contract, and take the overpayment salary for a year, until he reaches his true value or below it.
Plus that of Franchise Tags i be fine allowing Supplement picks having them, as long as the player haven't been drafted in the FNFL Entry Draft by another team, if they have they are ineligible unless they meet the last of the two Franchise Tag Rules, that states:
(B) Plays for same NHL team as FNHL team or if that team dracted then first in the FNHL draft
For me for every supplement player to have a set minimum contract if previous drafted or not, will just open the door for all high picked prospects to be dropped then re-supplement picked by their respective teams and to use a loophole to gain Salary advantage of 4-10% over a 2 year period if do it with 4 prospects, 2 per year, which for some teams could be 3 1st Round prospects).
Which in my view is cheating the Salary Cap Idea of the league.
Plus the Supplement Draft was first put forward to give a chance to find non drafted players, and add them to the MiLR roster instead of using up valuable main roster space
Is that MiLR players should be allowed to be dropped and then re-supplement picked if that GM wants to, but then that player has to be automatically signed to roster contract.
As stats in the MiLR rules: Once a player is removed from the MiLR they are ineligible to return to the MiLR.
The player contract should be league minimum, unless the said player has previously been drafted in the FNHL draft, then that player undergoes the same rules as of the ELC Contract Value.
All GM's are responsible to check if said player was drafted in the FNFL Entry Draft, as this is easily done seeing as all the drafts have a link in the rules page. Therefore not putting further work on PR and PPG.
You can always just put the player on a 1 year contract, and take the overpayment salary for a year, until he reaches his true value or below it.
Plus that of Franchise Tags i be fine allowing Supplement picks having them, as long as the player haven't been drafted in the FNFL Entry Draft by another team, if they have they are ineligible unless they meet the last of the two Franchise Tag Rules, that states:
(B) Plays for same NHL team as FNHL team or if that team dracted then first in the FNHL draft
For me for every supplement player to have a set minimum contract if previous drafted or not, will just open the door for all high picked prospects to be dropped then re-supplement picked by their respective teams and to use a loophole to gain Salary advantage of 4-10% over a 2 year period if do it with 4 prospects, 2 per year, which for some teams could be 3 1st Round prospects).
Which in my view is cheating the Salary Cap Idea of the league.
Plus the Supplement Draft was first put forward to give a chance to find non drafted players, and add them to the MiLR roster instead of using up valuable main roster space
