Author Topic: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)  (Read 1014 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« on: October 02, 2013, 07:09:34 PM »
FGM RC,

As most of you know there was a situation earlier this summer that lead to 2 long time GMs almost leaving the league which forced the RC to vote on internal transfers. The RC voted 4-3 to eliminate internal transfers but partially left internal transfers open for special occasions. The discussion and vote can be found below.

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=94767.0

The ruling that was passed has resulted in a subjective rule that is open to interpretation and opinion. The ruling was not concrete enough to be easily understood without possible mis-interpretation.

This situation is to great for the commissioner to decide on alone and I ask the RC to please vote on one of the options below so that this situation may finally be put to rest once and for all and FGM will have a concrete approach to Internal Transfers within the league that is easy for everyone to understand.

1)  No Internal Transfers be allowed at any time even under special cases. (This option would be similar to what was previously passed by the RC but eliminates any potential internal transfers due to special cases.

2) Allow Internal Transfers but only during special cases. (At this point in time I am not going to say what special cases will be allowed. If this option is chosen by the RC then at that time the RC will vote on special cases that will allow an internal transfer to happen).

Thanks,

Shooter

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2013, 08:07:07 PM »
I vote for option 2.  I believe that there should be internal transfers allowed.  I think that for GM's that have shown loyalty, activity, and good performance should be rewarded.  I know this can lead to hurt feelings for owners that don't get to manage their favorite teams but I still feel that if the special circumstances are met then it should be allowed.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2013, 11:34:32 PM »
I vote forOption #1 - No internal transfers under any circumstances.

There can be no gray area when it comes to this issue.  We have witnessed in the recent past how hurtful the process can be when existing members are not allowed to transfer to an open team.  Personalities inevitably rear their heads and the potential damage is not worth it.  People say hurtful things, quit--or threaten to quit, and feeling do get hurt.  Is such a thing really necessary or even worth it?  I say no.

When GMs are accepted into the league, there is no proviso saying, "Take this opening and when another one comes up later you can transfer."  GMs come into the league with their eyes wide open and they are approved for a given team.  We all participate for different reasons, but if a league has an opening, and it's a team you "hate", why agree to take it over?

 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2467
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2013, 07:37:37 AM »
I vote for option # 1 absent the specific conditions by which we would allow transfers.  I fear that the condition for transfer would not be be one I had in mind when I was the commissioner and left the door open for the remote possibility down the road.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2013, 11:13:30 AM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline VolsRaysBucs

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3677
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :ORL:
    • :TBL:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2013, 09:23:40 AM »
#2 is my vote, however I would give precedent to an owner who has not yet changed teams. I don't want to see a system that just allows GMs to jump from one team to a better one every time one opens up. I feel if a GM has made a move once, that should be it, thus making the decision to stay or move more important. We need GMs who are "all in" with their teams, not just treading water with an eye on greener pastures. As for those who will feel compelled to leave over the outcome, I say let them leave. It really is as simple as that. The league will survive. That being said, I sincerely hope everyone stays on as I think the league is heading in the right direction and the members have much to do with that.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2013, 11:40:57 AM »
I vote for #2 but let's make it clear where a GM needs X months service time with their current club to become eligible.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2013, 11:58:06 AM »
The current vote is:

Option #1 - 2 Votes (:SF: Flash, :TEX: Rcankosy)

Option #2 - 3 Votes (:PHI: Papps, :TB: Volsraysbucs, :PIT: Profsl)

Following RC Members have yet to vote

:BAL: Shooter47 (Myself)
:LAD: Bhows
:KC: Kungfuwig
:MIL: BrewersGM
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2013, 12:38:33 PM »
Also, I would have a clear points system for how transfers are awarded.

3 pts for favorite team
2 pts for betterment of league (taking a very bad team)
1 pt for any other transfer

Ties are broken by performance relative to expectations during most recent completed season.  If a team has the 12th highest cap and finished 8th then that is a +4 rating.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline kungfuwig

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1962
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NY:
    • :CLG:
    • :ArizonaState:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2013, 06:24:25 PM »
I vote option 2 but with a concrete set of parameters around who can transfer and how often. I think an owner MUST be with their team one complete season and only be allowed to transfer teams once during their tenure with FGM. I also believe if a GM leaves the league for one reason or another they can be allowed into the league again once, and not be able to transfer once in. Also they would obviously need to be voted back I to the league. If multiple GM's who fit the guidelines apply we give points on time in the league, contribution, favorite team and a league vote.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"This is your life and its ending one minute at a time"

Offline VolsRaysBucs

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3677
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :ORL:
    • :TBL:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2013, 09:29:43 AM »
I like Freddy's idea of concrete parameters and voting being involved.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM