Author Topic: Replacing Inactive GM's  (Read 1392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Replacing Inactive GM's
« on: September 24, 2011, 05:26:19 PM »
There have been a few inactive GM's that I will be looking to replace. People have started asking about whether they can switch teams if they like one of the inactive teams. I'm not opposed to this, but if we do allow this, there needs to be a fair procedure (which I'm having a very difficult time thinking of). Anybody have any ideas?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2011, 05:49:47 PM »
Priority by Join Date of League then Join Date of ProFSL
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline snbts

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2946
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2011, 08:53:59 PM »
I agree with Colby, I think that is a good idea
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If God be your partner, make your plans large.--D.L.Moody

:STL: 2013 NL only vs AL only World Series Champions
:StLouisBrowns: 2013 Old School World Series Champions
:DET: 2013 Mendoza Line World Series Champions

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2011, 08:57:00 PM »
Colby,
Has anybody been unhappy with that system so far?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

BrewCrew

  • Guest
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2011, 09:21:20 PM »
I think you need to add a rule where you couldn't switch more than once in a year (or ever).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2011, 09:22:41 PM »
I think you need to add a rule where you couldn't switch more than once in a year (or ever).
I'm strongly considering that. I don't want this to be musical chairs.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

E.J.

  • Guest
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2011, 03:07:07 AM »
I started using this for CoC1/2. I mainly used the same concept as FGM.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline kenny

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2653
  • Bonus inPoints: 1
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Columbia:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2011, 02:43:01 PM »
I'm considering the following:

If the GM position of an organization is unfilled, a current GM may resign from their current organization and take on this role.

The GM may only switch organizations once during their tenure with the league.

GM's are to provide a list of (maximum) three teams that they may wish to switch to in the future. The list has to be provided to the Commissioner's Office prior to the announcement that the team has been made available. This rule is in place to prevent people from switching teams just to get better players.

In the event more than one GM has the same organization on their wishlist, priority will be given to the GM with the longer tenure in this league.


Any thoughts on this?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

dmend19

  • Guest
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2011, 03:10:39 PM »
I think that sounds good Kenny.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snbts

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2946
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Replacing Inactive GM's
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2011, 06:16:55 PM »
I am in agreement as well, Kenny
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If God be your partner, make your plans large.--D.L.Moody

:STL: 2013 NL only vs AL only World Series Champions
:StLouisBrowns: 2013 Old School World Series Champions
:DET: 2013 Mendoza Line World Series Champions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM