Author Topic: Scoring Categories  (Read 17107 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #130 on: December 01, 2009, 11:56:14 PM »
I suggest we change over to the new scoring system as soon as possible for contract extensions.

Agreed.  No one anticipated this, so any gain/loss from this is completely by chance and should be considered part of the game (not like market conditions don't change in MLB).  No special clause to help owners that might need to pay more now, no money back for those who would have saved if they waited.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #131 on: December 02, 2009, 09:28:30 AM »
Agreed.  No one anticipated this, so any gain/loss from this is completely by chance and should be considered part of the game (not like market conditions don't change in MLB).  No special clause to help owners that might need to pay more now, no money back for those who would have saved if they waited.

I completely agree except that the people with the pending extensions will receive the better choice since they fell in limbo.

Now, with OF defensive statistics... I say we just assign a constant amount for each inning they play on defense (if that is available) or game played and then add for assists and subtract for errors.

Utility will have no defense.  I'll have to test this out on my select group which includes players such as Albert Pujols (awesome hitter, great defense), Raul Ibanez (good hitter, poor defense) and Pedro Feliz (poor hitter, solid defense).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #132 on: December 02, 2009, 01:40:13 PM »
I updated the scoring system, and I ended up tweaking the defensive settings and multiplying all of the batting stats by 150%, so everything on the hitters side stayed in Bill James fashion with the pitchers.  I believe if you view all hitters, you will see just their batting stats as field stats apply on a per-position basis.  One thing I had to do was make the catcher fielding stats as dry as the outfield thanks to the likes of Victor Martinez (1B), Pablo Sandoval (3B), and Kurt Suzuku (DH). 

I am still doing some slight tweaks as we speak.  You'll see Mauer and A-Rod lower than expected, but keep in mind that this is points-based, so their time on the DL means they earned 0 points in such periods.  A useful sorting stat is the Fantasy Points per Game.  I would like everyone on the RC look for oddities and outliers and give comments on how this looks.  We may always be tweaking this year-to-year, but I am not worried about that now so much as egregious differences in points.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #133 on: December 02, 2009, 01:53:21 PM »
I looked at the top-50 batters per fantasy points per game, and everything looks pretty reasonable except for Joe Mauer.  You'll see Runs Created Per Game in parenthesis.  He is the only batter outside of Pujols that has over 0.9 RC/G.  Why isn't he in the top three?  Mauer hit mostly singles, but it has to be something more than this.  Is it the defensive points that he is losing out on?

Top 50 Batters
25.9 - Pujols, Albert - STL (0.943)
24.9 - Fielder, Prince - MIL (0.859)
24.2 - Teixeira, Mark - NYY (0.816)
24 - Braun, Ryan - MIL  (0.836)
23.8 - Lee, Derrek - CHC  (0.818)
23.8 - Youkilis, Kevin - BOS  (0.804)
23.7 - Utley, Chase - PHI (0.787)
23.6 - Ramirez, Hanley - FLA (0.823)
23.4 - Jones, Garrett - PIT  (0.784)
23.3 - Jeter, Derek - NYY (0.778)
23.3 - Howard, Ryan - PHI (0.771)
23.3 - Votto, Joey - CIN (0.802)
23.2 - Beltran, Carlos - NYM  (0.774)
23.1 - Rodriguez, Alex - NYY (0.759)
23.1 - Suzuki, Ichiro - SEA  (0.778)
22.9 - Choo, Shin-Soo - CLE  (0.745)
22.9 - Gonzalez, Adrian - SD (0.733)
22.8 - McCutchen, Andrew - PIT (0.725)
22.8 - Ramirez, Manny - LAD (0.732)
22.7 - Dunn, Adam - WAS  (0.721)
22.7 - Lind, Adam - TOR (0.758)
22.7 - Bay, Jason - BOS (0.73)
22.6 - Mauer, Joe - MIN (0.916)
22.6 - Cabrera, Miguel - DET (0.756)
22.4 - Holliday, Matt - STL (0.733)
22.4 - Delgado, Carlos - NYM (0.723)
22.3 - Sandoval, Pablo - SF (0.752)
22.3 - Helton, Todd - COL  (0.724)
22.3 - Span, Denard - MIN  (0.683)
22.3 - Reynolds, Mark - ARI  (0.701)
22.2 - Upton, Justin - ARI  (0.727)
22.2 - Pena, Carlos - TB (0.673)
22.2 - Sizemore, Grady - CLE (0.643)
22.2 - Young, Michael - TEX (0.728)
22.1 - Coghlan, Chris - FLA (0.709)
22.1 - Morneau, Justin - MIN (0.69)
22.1 - Branyan, Russell - SEA (0.676)
22.1 - Zimmerman, Ryan - WAS (0.7)
22.1 - Werth, Jayson - PHI  (0.692)
22.1 - Scutaro, Marco - TOR (0.654)
22.1 - Damon, Johnny - NYY (0.697)
22 - Figgins, Chone - LAA (0.659)
22 - Zobrist, Ben - TB  (0.725)
21.9 - Weeks, Rickie - MIL (0.681)
21.9 - Hill, Aaron - TOR  (0.68)
21.9 - Ruiz, Randy - TOR  (0.742)
21.9 - Pedroia, Dustin - BOS (0.668)
21.8 - Roberts, Brian - BAL  (0.67)
21.8 - Berkman, Lance - HOU  (0.676)
21.8 - Tulowitzki, Troy - COL (0.703)
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

mjmezzetti

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #134 on: December 02, 2009, 03:45:46 PM »
If you post the latest spreadsheet I'll take a look to see if anything jumps out at me.  You mentioned you upped the hitting stats 150%, I imagine this depreciates pitching statistics/values?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #135 on: December 02, 2009, 04:08:57 PM »
If you post the latest spreadsheet I'll take a look to see if anything jumps out at me.  You mentioned you upped the hitting stats 150%, I imagine this depreciates pitching statistics/values?

I didn't even base it off of the spreadsheet anymore except that the original spreadsheet was reflecting heavy defensive points because of the 1B bias (1000+ points for Pujols on DEF), so to keep everything in line with Bill James' ratios, I increased the hitting.  This actually kept everything much more balanced between Batting, Fielding, and Pitching no matter which range of players you look at.  You'll be able to view all of the updated scoring on Fantrax.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #136 on: December 02, 2009, 07:07:08 PM »
As you may know, you should be reviewing the scoring system on Fantrax.  Now ended up being a good time to do it because Fantrax ranking algorithm changed.

The problem that I personally face is a contract extension that I have to give to Aubrey Huff.  According to the old rankings, I was going to give him $6m.  I traded for this RFA from Baltimore knowing this.  The new rankings say he was the 9th best CI in 2008 (he had a good season) and is due some $14.5m.  I fall into the pending contract extension phase that a few others do, but my situation is a bit unique as I traded for an RFA.  Under the rules, I am forced to sign Huff, but now his value doubled.

We seem to all agree on the pending extensions that they will receive the lower value from each system.  I think I should be allowed to sign Huff to a 1-year $6m deal per the old rankings, but I want to have the scoring finalized first.

As we discussed over PM, Fantrax has already stated there is no way to go back or even view the old rankings.  Options will have to be given to GMs who are involved in pending extensions.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

clidwin

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #137 on: December 02, 2009, 07:26:23 PM »
you are definatly right! I think you should be grandfather in. So you should have the right with the old ranking. But we need to see if anyone else is under this problem.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #138 on: December 02, 2009, 07:30:50 PM »
you are definatly right! I think you should be grandfather in. So you should have the right with the old ranking. But we need to see if anyone else is under this problem.

I am the only one with an RFA that has to be signed.  I am sure there are some GMs who were waiting to sign players at their prices until after some trade talks, but there is nothing that we can do for them.  Chad, what did you think of the scoring system?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

clidwin

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #139 on: December 02, 2009, 08:13:38 PM »
That scoring system is way out of my league. I believe how you did it is the closest to what we are looking for. And if it was up to me, I dont know a person like you colby that finds info. and researches the info any better then you. So what I read on this Rules Committee Page is the best around for Fantasy Baseball!! And thats another reason, I really enjoy this league!  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] SIGN UP
    Today at 09:03:45 PM
  • Daddy: Im updating it. Its a lot more information coming
    Today at 09:04:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: awesome
    Today at 09:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: Please list a college affiliate with your sign up
    Today at 09:04:29 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: done and done thx again
    Today at 09:06:10 PM
  • Rhino7: Got it, thanks
    Today at 09:07:37 PM
  • Rhino7: Minor league team too?
    Today at 09:08:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: can two teams have same college?
    Today at 09:17:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nevermind u have great edit skills
    Today at 09:18:27 PM
  • Braves155: I'll be interested to see who takes a few overlooked teams
    Today at 09:21:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i went homer
    Today at 09:23:10 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: wasnt gonna pass both up
    Today at 09:23:18 PM
  • Braves155: Clippers are listed 2x
    Today at 09:24:15 PM
  • Braves155: Brooklyn is missing
    Today at 09:26:33 PM
  • Daddy: Thanks guys, youre the best. But...im updating the sheet in real time, hand typed and adding information as I go.
    Today at 09:52:20 PM
  • Daddy: I appreciate all of your assistance. :rofl:
    Today at 09:52:43 PM
  • Daddy: Daddy: Im going to post it Today at 08:01:14 PM Daddy: But I will be editing it with team information on the fly Today at 08:01:32 PM
    Today at 09:53:51 PM
  • Daddy: Give me a few and I will link the final version, I havent looked at the replies yet.
    Today at 09:58:09 PM
  • Daddy: I was looking up G League team names which I never knew all 30 before today :rofl:
    Today at 09:58:55 PM
  • Daddy: There is actually more than 30. Expansion must be on the horizon.
    Today at 09:59:49 PM
  • Daddy: Isnt the NBA going back to Seattle?
    Today at 10:00:20 PM
  • IndianaBuc: That would be awesome
    Today at 10:02:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i dunno abt that
    Today at 10:15:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but an expansion is deff up there
    Today at 10:15:33 PM
  • Daddy: Seattle is getting the Sonics back I think
    Today at 10:16:02 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: [link]
    Today at 10:16:14 PM
  • Daddy: I think two more teams are coming 32 teams total
    Today at 10:16:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that link ^ talks abt expansion
    Today at 10:16:49 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah Vegas is getting one
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: not anytime soon
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: prolly in another 3 4 yrs
    Today at 10:17:16 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas is getting everything by the time its said and done.
    Today at 10:17:23 PM
  • Daddy: If there is demand we will expand ourselves. To hell with waiting for the NBA. We can put franchises in Vegas & Seattle and have a 32 team league.
    Today at 10:18:34 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas GM can pick his own team name
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its already getting an mlb team now
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • Daddy: So shall it be
    Today at 10:18:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: so thats 3/4 major sports
    Today at 10:19:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlb nhl and nfl
    Today at 10:19:04 PM
  • Daddy: Im opening up the Seattle Super Sonics! Lol...we bout to shake Crap up.
    Today at 10:19:51 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas Powerballs? We need to come up with something that makes the city of Vegas say hmmmm. I bet we can.
    Today at 10:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: The Las Vegas Ignite (i dig this)
    Today at 10:30:51 PM
  • Brent: The Las Vegas Gamblers
    Today at 10:49:05 PM
  • STLBlues91: If  someone wants chicago I dont mind taking over Las Vegas as well
    Today at 10:49:06 PM
  • Daddy: Its going to be fun having the two expansion teams. It will also balance out the league a bit more
    Today at 11:04:43 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent i dig it
    Today at 11:05:39 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Today at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Today at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Today at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Today at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Today at 11:29:29 PM