0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'll always opt for the simplest approach so I'd lean towards nominating/branding at the time the player is drafted. It'd be a gamble and there is nothing wrong with that. Certainly this keeps us from having to track every single draftee moving forward.As far as tracking the original contract, I don't think it is necessary. If I trade Max Domi away and he is on a favourable contract then my trade partner gets the savings for the remainder of the contract. Just delete the Avs icon and move him along. I don't think we'd be facing a ton of 'sign and trade' scenarios especially if we had to nominate from the time they are drafted, as in most cases it will take several years for a prospect to start making an impact. Even if it does drive a few larger contracts down the over-all effect will still be less than if we are able to nominate 2 HTD's per year.
Yeah sorry, don't really like it. I fancy it the way it is, which is great.
Again, I like the idea generally but these stipulations are not needed. See my post above.
Agree here. Don't fancy the hometown discount, I dispise Minnesota irl same thing. If anything hometown - place of birth would be more exciting but requires a hell of a job. I like it now being randomized with players
I think the league has enough wrinkles without adding more to it. Extensions are already low in comparison to what players sell for in FA. third reason , i hate the Montreal NHL team and really dont like many of their players.
2) Actually play for the same team in the NHL as they do in FNHL3) Contract value is over $4.0 million (could be $3m)