Author Topic: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers  (Read 5318 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2013, 11:46:51 AM »
Im not in favor of a team getting extra cap space to please their prospective owner, many teams would want the same treatment.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2013, 11:53:47 AM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline MillerTime

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 7697
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2013, 12:00:13 PM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor.

I respect all of this statement and agree.  At the very least the standard for manager selection should be improved.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2013, 12:13:34 PM »
We should update the rules to limit a GM transfer to once every 5 years and a lifetime max of 3 different teams.  We should also have a formula for internal transfers that takes relative performance in account.

In reality, we have two applicants for this job being joeshmoe and nerwffej.  By my executive ruling, joeshmoe would have the job due to longer tenure with his franchise.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2013, 12:47:47 PM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor.

I don't need to call anyone a name or anything.  I am not doing that.  What I am saying is, what was the measure of improvement that I needed to show before getting a promotion?  Was it make 5 trades good or bad?  I have ascertained offers, and everytime I get counters that are a joke.  I mean honestly...why would I trade the pieces I do have to set back 4-5 years.  I never had superstars to trade away and recoup great talent, except AGON and the return would have worked had Gamel gotten healthy two years ago.  All signs were good. 

What I am saying is, show me where you think I haven't done anything...or not enough.  Show me....point to it.  Not just a stupid w/l column stat.  It's exactly why Colby said he wont be viable til 2015.  Because to do it right takes time.  Look at my drafts and tell me I screwed up the rebuild.  It's not the case it's the expectations...and those were never posted...except for in the instance of a tie.

As far as my time of absence...I admit it.  I was gone in 2011 due to a horrible breakup that coincided with the RFA schedule?  I messed up...but life was in the tubes for me.  I lost a few guys that I would have signed cheap, maybe, but that opportunity would have prevented me from other opportunities.  I am simply pointing out...what is the reason someone believes the Padres are no better than they were?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Eric

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #35 on: May 05, 2013, 12:50:39 PM »
Chris, can you just leave it? You have said the same thing over and over again. I think everybody gets your point. Just let it play out as it should. Its fantasy, no need to fire on all 8 cylinders over a team.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #36 on: May 05, 2013, 03:39:36 PM »
Chris, can you just leave it? You have said the same thing over and over again. I think everybody gets your point. Just let it play out as it should. Its fantasy, no need to fire on all 8 cylinders over a team.

It's not fire or anything else.  Others have said I did nothing with the Padres (Dan Wood, Corey) but they never provided a single reason why they felt that way.  Asking for a reason is perfectly acceptable. 

Furthermore, Corey is in a thread continuing to say these things and you chimed in "I agree 110%" so if you truly wish to calm the storm stop supporting someone from ranting baseless claims. 

It's quite insane to me that I got lambasted for asking the league to follow the rules set forth.  I slang no mud and made legitimate posts to base an opinion on.  I used evidence.  I'm asking that those who have taken a perch and are slinging arrows at me at least offer why they have the opinion they do.  That's not much.

And it's hard to have fun when Corey is using this to strike his personal vendetta against me.  I brought up a rule and this is the disrespect it cost me.  Horrendous.  I admit Corey and I don't get along, but I'm also not here saying he's a terrible manager and a bad person.  I am getting that from others though and if they're going to say it, they should be able to point to why.

Corey, I asked for the three instances you claim I was absent...you said you'd show me...do it!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Eric

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2013, 03:41:54 PM »
If you don't like how things are ran around here then just quit instead of keep rambling about the same things in every post.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #38 on: May 05, 2013, 03:55:55 PM »
If you don't like how things are ran around here then just quit instead of keep rambling about the same things in every post.

No, I don't have to quit because people were trying to end around the rules.  I also would have stopped posting about the same things had they been answered at all.  It's a discussion thread for the purposes of proposing questions and getting answers.

Lastly, where's this advice for Corey who is using this opportunity to insult my management without the base of the claim stated.  He has said much of the same things on many posts and in three threads now.  Instead of suggesting he quit you are suggesting he not quit.  It's a two edged sword you're using to villainize my concern about this issue that in fact affects me.

Where has the respect for a member of this league gone?  It's fantasy, it shouldn't be hard to have respectful disagreements. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #39 on: May 05, 2013, 05:44:30 PM »
First off, its not a personal vendetta. Its purely simple for the 5th time, since you cant comprehend. The Padres have not improved. Your cap continues to fall because you fail to put a team out there to even win 35 games. 35 games would keep your cap constant but you failed to do that.

You claim no talent? Where is agonz or better yet where is the return? Where is Chase Headley or the return...

The team has not got better. I dont care if it was Dan Wood who was running the Padres, I would say he should not the Dodgers because the team has done nothing.

Im sorry you take everything personal by thinking its a vendetta. That must happen to you a lot.

Record of inactivity for Joeshmoe


11/1/12 - 12/5/12
12/9/12 - 1/12/13
9/12/11 - 11/30/11

There is your inactivity.

You will be allowed the last word as I am done responding. Each time I respond I give the same answer and you are unable to process the information being given.

If you would like me to post the dates of your penalties and ban dates let me know.
I can also post the posts that got you banned and ruined a league as well.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2013, 06:14:47 PM by Corey »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Its not that i dont like them but i want to add specific things and idk how the draft will shake out, also there are always teams wanting to invest heavy.
    Today at 01:40:27 PM
  • Daddy: We usually match in what our needs are. Then i see those teams stack like twenty picks and make magic. While i make my own magic.
    Today at 01:41:29 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid deserves a haul. If Edmonton is moving him. Philly is armed to the teeth.
    Today at 01:42:13 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton would also be armed to the teeth. Our draft is just a few days after the real one. We aint got time to ho hum. Its bout to be go time.
    Today at 01:44:09 PM
  • Daddy: You interested in The Flyers draft picks. I need names. I need pms. By 6/2 my picks will belong to some very fortunate franchise.
    Today at 01:47:39 PM
  • Daddy: Some of you guys have known me for fourteen years or more. I am a very reliable source for draft picks no matter the sport.
    Today at 01:55:39 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: what exactly are u looking for
    Today at 01:59:10 PM
  • Daddy: Depends on the team. Each one has something different. G, C, D, Crap we need wingers, i prefer guys that play both LW/RW. Im looking to improve. Thats always what im looking for. But to do so in a way that my partner also improves.
    Today at 02:02:32 PM
  • Daddy: You can build a dominant team without dominating every trade or even any trade. Doesn't matter what you give up if you get what you see as a key piece.
    Today at 02:03:49 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton and LA are the leaders for my picks. LA unfortunately has no GM and by the time one sacs up im going to probably have dealt.
    Today at 02:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: You know we speak like this is boxing. Like there is a physical contest and you here me joking about foots etc. but we including myself are couch jockeys.
    Today at 02:08:39 PM
  • Daddy: Smack talk comes with sports. Ask about Kobe. Ask about Jordan. Ask about most of the greats. We are boxing gents. Mental boxing. From our phones and computers.
    Today at 02:09:52 PM
  • Daddy: I dont mean to bruise anyone's vagina. I cant help myself. Im a habitual vagina bruiser. Sincerely.
    Today at 02:11:08 PM
  • OUDAN: Imagine lying to all of us like that lollll\
    Today at 03:48:54 PM
  • Daddy: Up yours Danno :rofl:
    Today at 04:16:28 PM
  • OUDAN: Hahaha
    Today at 04:22:07 PM
  • Daddy: Takes a certain kind of guy to even do dynasty and unfortunately many of them are.. umm "sensitive" is a good word. I am a lot of personality, but im very good at what i do. I might suck at everything else but in dynasty fantasy i am ELITE.
    Today at 04:29:57 PM
  • Daddy: As both an owner & moderator. It im ok letting you know about it.
    Today at 04:30:41 PM
  • Daddy: Its ok to be diverse. Dont chat
    Today at 04:31:36 PM
  • Daddy: Close the chat and just run your team.
    Today at 04:31:59 PM
  • Daddy: In dynasty fantasy i have the Mamba mentality and there are others like me.
    Today at 04:33:49 PM
  • Daddy: You own a baseball team for ten years and get mad you have to throw 35 innings pitched. In a week. Of baseball. Da fuq? No. Get out. Dont want you.
    Today at 04:36:25 PM
  • Daddy: Fuq u been doing? Try art or some Crap. Take up painting. Ten years you cant field a starting rotation? Da fuq is you illiterate?
    Today at 04:38:27 PM
  • Daddy: PLAYSTATION/XBOX = EA Sports (its in the game! :) )
    Today at 04:40:06 PM
  • Daddy: The rest of you join my big mouth ass and lets play ball.
    Today at 04:41:03 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey fan much [link] NHL LIVE is fantasy hockey on illegal substances. Just like NFL/MLB LIVE it offers a unique perspective on "modern day" fantasy sport experience.
    Today at 05:27:47 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE owners here are your spreadsheets [link] you can see your Franchises, your availability cap, your RFAs, all of it. Make your plans. Talk yo talk. Be ready.
    Today at 05:50:15 PM
  • STLBlues91: I will be around the rest of the night. I will finish correcting 5 spreadsheets and then they all should match. I am officially on summer vacation
    Today at 06:35:36 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to YURmom. The first female of LIVE as its only female LIVE GM. Thats a keeper @Mt_Crushmore! :toast:
    Today at 09:23:01 PM
  • Daddy: #Chicks dig da dynasty
    Today at 09:24:43 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to all actively bidding in the Nico Hoerner sweepstakes! [link] MLB LIVE never sleeps.
    Today at 09:29:27 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to @jmntl82 [link] congratulations on your first of many LIVE trades.
    Today at 09:31:14 PM
  • Daddy: Well damn.. congratulations on your second trade in the last fifteen minutes. :rofl: Bartender i will have what he's having.
    Today at 09:37:13 PM
  • IndianaBuc: I’ll have a double.
    Today at 09:38:53 PM
  • jmntl82: Stay tuned, we're building something over here in Detroit
    Today at 09:43:10 PM
  • Brent: PM sent Detroit
    Today at 09:51:02 PM
  • Rhino7: Bartender pour me another :toast:
    Today at 09:56:30 PM
  • Daddy: We are building something. In every sport. Non stop. Its what we do.
    Today at 10:11:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yup, sometimes people dont see the vision. Sometimes the vision Fricks up. You dont know till the chips are cashed in
    Today at 10:12:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I once traded a full draft class 1-7, an additional 1st, 3 offensive flyer players for what player you might ask?
    Today at 10:13:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: WR Jalen Reagor lmaaooo  :rofl:
    Today at 10:14:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And won my first chip that same season. Reagor starting in the flex scoring 9 points
    Today at 10:14:39 PM
  • jmntl82: How did the other team finish?
    Today at 10:16:01 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: It was dallas. I think he missed the playoffs that year. Then used the draft picks on the 2021 class. Every pick was the 32nd pick (dont remembee what the other 1st became)
    Today at 10:18:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Idk if anyone remembers the 2021 class but it was weak on offense outside or the top 10-15. I dont regret the deal just learned and move on. As long as you have assets, you can mold your build how you want. Picks are usually the most valuable asset because most gms want in on a draft.
    Today at 10:19:34 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The results of that draft class is here [link]
    Today at 10:20:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Every 32 overall pick dallas makes in each round came from that trade
    Today at 10:20:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The 2024 and 2025 classes look much more promising than that one lol
    Today at 10:22:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: 2021 draft class was my worst class as a NFL Live gm. my 2022 and 2023 were better
    Today at 10:32:52 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I think it was the worst for most of us. It was a bad class overall. The top was amazing tho
    Today at 10:42:05 PM