Poll

Who has made the most improvements this offseason? (You may change vote)

Arizona Diamondbacks
0 (0%)
Atlanta Braves
0 (0%)
Baltimore Orioles
2 (16.7%)
Boston Red Sox
0 (0%)
Chicago Cubs
0 (0%)
Chicago White Sox
0 (0%)
Cincinnati Reds
1 (8.3%)
Cleveland Indians
0 (0%)
Colorado Rockies
2 (16.7%)
Detroit Tigers
0 (0%)
Florida Marlins
0 (0%)
Houston Astros
0 (0%)
Kansas City Royals
0 (0%)
Los Angeles Angels
1 (8.3%)
Los Angeles Dodgers
0 (0%)
Milwaukee Brewers
3 (25%)
Minnesota Twins
0 (0%)
New York Mets
0 (0%)
New York Yankees
1 (8.3%)
Oakland Athletics
2 (16.7%)
Philadelphia Phillies
0 (0%)
Pittsburgh Pirates
0 (0%)
St Louis Cardinals
0 (0%)
San Diego Padres
0 (0%)
San Francisco Giants
0 (0%)
Seattle Mariners
0 (0%)
Tampa Bay Rays
0 (0%)
Texas Rangers
0 (0%)
Toronto Blue Jays
0 (0%)
Washington Nationals
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Voting closed: April 19, 2010, 01:18:18 PM

Author Topic: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?  (Read 2209 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« on: November 20, 2009, 12:18:18 PM »
This thread was started by Jake but lost in the forum crash.  Also, Mike had an NL Central public opinion poll.  It's worth combining all of those opinions into this new poll.  Who has made the most improvements this offseason? (You may change vote)
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

bridgestone

  • Guest
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2009, 12:46:19 PM »
If the Angels sign Holliday and get another stud pitcher then they are the team to beat this offseason.  That team has the veteran talent with a loaded farm and plenty of picks to boot.  They also have a ton of cash for the spring.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline MillerTime

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 7697
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2009, 01:36:18 PM »
Brewers by far in my opinion.  Puljols and Beckham.


This thread was started by Jake but lost in the forum crash.  Also, Mike had an NL Central public opinion poll.  It's worth combining all of those opinions into this new poll.  Who has made the most improvements this offseason? (You may change vote)
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2009, 02:10:16 PM »
I think it is hard to say one team has had the best moves. The Brew Crew has had a great off season with the addition of Albert, Beckham, Sanchez and Danks to go with Braun, Lee, Yovi, and Prince. At the same time, they lack depth in their line up, and have quite a few players that will be in theminors for the duration of next year. The A's have done a real good job with getting Kendry, Drew, Aramis, Pinero and making themselves part of the AL West discussion. The Angels and Giants have done a good job of filling their holes (holes he says) by adding bats(Giants) and pitching(Angels), as well as draft picks. The Rockies acquired who I think is soon to be one of the best players in the game in Justin Upton, and one of the best pitchers in Dan Haren. The Pirates will soon have a very dominating 1/2 CI punch once Pedro gets the call. And I feel I have made my team better from top to bottom, and I have given myself a farm system. Which, despite your opinion, I felt was sorely lacking grade A prospects. And the Dodgers who were deep to begin with, added AJ, and Aaron Harang. So I think it is hard to distinguish just one team having the best off-season. Can we just start free agency now?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 02:16:53 PM »
I actually don't view Lee as a long-term option, but thanks for the compliments at what I have done so far!  The Pirates lineup and starting rotation has greatly improved already...

Best Batters of Lineup - 09 vs. 10
Doumit, Cutch, Kennedy vs. Lee, Cutch, McCann

Starting Rotation - 09 vs. 10
Duke, Maholm, Ohlendorf, Morton, Karstens vs. Duke, Bannister, Maholm, Owings, Ohlendorf
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 06:01:48 PM by Colby »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12557
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 06:11:51 PM »
Brewers by far in my opinion.  Puljols and Beckham.
I don't understand the infatuation with Gordon Beckham. Absolutely a good infielder. Compare with McGehee:
  G    AB  R    H   2B 3B  HR  RBI    TB    BB   SO  SB  CS     OBP      SLG     AVG   
 116 355 58 107  20  1   16   66   177   34    67   0   2      .360     .499     .301

Beckham:
 103 378 58 102   28 1   14   63   174   41    65   7    4     .347      .460     .270
Pretty much comparable and McGehee fended off Gamels who was supposed to be the Brewers top 2 or 3 prospect. Yes, I'm thrilled to get him a N.Feliz for Beckham and a 2A pitcher

 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2009, 06:17:04 PM »
I don't understand the infatuation with Gordon Beckham. Absolutely a good infielder. Compare with McGehee:
  G    AB  R    H   2B 3B  HR  RBI    TB    BB   SO  SB  CS     OBP      SLG     AVG   
 116 355 58 107  20  1   16   66   177   34    67   0   2      .360     .499     .301

Beckham:
 103 378 58 102   28 1   14   63   174   41    65   7    4     .347      .460     .270
Pretty much comparable and McGehee fended off Gamels who was supposed to be the Brewers top 2 or 3 prospect. Yes, I'm thrilled to get him a N.Feliz for Beckham and a 2A pitcher

Exactly what I am thinking... see my poll in the Dugout that involves Beckham...
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2009, 06:45:31 PM »
Because Casey never did it in the minors until his final AAA season. He was more or less an also ran prior to this year. He doesn't come with the pedigree that Beckham does. Plus Beckham is one year out of college, and he has a sweet head of hair.

HR     RBI     SB     CS     BB     SO  BA  OBP     SLG     OPS     
3     23     2     3     10     46  .272  .302  .391 .693   Age 20  A
10     66     2     1     33     69     .261  .310  .394  .704 Age 21 - A -adv
8     72     2     2     43     64     .297  .354  .422  .776 Age 22 - AA
11     68     0     3     41     70     .280  .336  .406  .742 Age 23 - AAA
10     59     1     3     43     83     .261  .325  .404  .729 Age 24 - AA/AAA
12     92     0     3     40     89     .296  .345  .429  .774  Age 25 - AAA
16     66     0     2     34     67     .301  .360  .499  .859  Age 26 - Majors - MIL

One of these things (years) is not like the other...

Beckham
 HR     RBI     SB     CS     BB     SO     BA     OBP     SLG     OPS
3     8     0     1     5     7     .310  .365  .500  .865 - Age 22 A
4     25     2     0     14     26     .326  .378  .526  .904 - Age 22 AA/AAA
14     63     7     4     41     65     .270  .347  .460  .808 - Age 22 Majors

What you have is a decent 26 year old player and a 22 year old burgeoning star. One is Jeff Kent one is Mark Loretta. And it ain't even close.      
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 06:57:13 PM by Dan Wood »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

KDoc09

  • Guest
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2009, 06:50:44 PM »
I would have to say the Oakland A's have made the greatest strides in improving their team both for the now and the future. While the Brewers may have made the biggest splash by grabbing the best player in the sport without weakening his already potent base, the A's have have made themselves a relevant club once again by grabbing up contributing talent using limited means (somewhat depleted farm system and low payroll). And he has done all of this without weakening himself for the long term thanks to his ability to add players without losing Anderson, who in my opinion is one of the real rising stars in the sport and also by shrewdly adding Justin Smoak, who should give him a CI to build around for years to come. The Bay Area is on the rise so beware!!!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12557
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Who has made the most improvements this offseason?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2009, 07:16:20 PM »
 How many players over the years were late bloomers? Gamels and his pedigree was killin' it in 3A and McGehee started in front of him in Milwaukee. Plus I got a top 5 pitching prospect. I'll stand by the trade.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Added to the cable bill of like $200. That nobody ever used.
    Yesterday at 05:25:01 PM
  • Daddy: So i had DirecTV for 12 months to use Sunday ticket for 3 months and paid like 3 installments of roughly $100 added to my $200m bill.
    Yesterday at 05:26:18 PM
  • Daddy: For that i got two TVs that could watch any game any time any where. Problem is they getting played at the same times. You cant watch every game. Why you charging me for every game?
    Yesterday at 05:27:40 PM
  • Daddy: If thats the case i should have access to 32 different monitors. Right?
    Yesterday at 05:30:19 PM
  • Daddy: Or maybe 16. I would take 16. But two. Give me my bread back Mafia!
    Yesterday at 05:31:38 PM
  • Daddy: Making me watch  Bo Nix + Zach Wilson + Jared Stidham = you should be paying me
    Yesterday at 05:33:56 PM
  • Daddy: Me and coach Payton [link]
    Yesterday at 05:34:53 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Thats cap by the way. I pay for my own way to watch my team
    Yesterday at 05:41:55 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont have your account or login
    Yesterday at 05:42:07 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I used yours for 1-2 seasons.
    Yesterday at 05:43:32 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I used my mothers for a decade before that
    Yesterday at 05:43:46 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: But ive used my way for the past few years. Ill be paying attention like i said
    Yesterday at 05:44:27 PM
  • Daddy: She deserves a refund too
    Yesterday at 05:46:27 PM
  • Daddy: The point was DirecTV never got in your pockets and it was a rip-off but they had a monopoly on the product. Im not loving all the streaming games but DTV will be paying $$$.
    Yesterday at 05:48:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The new iteration with Youtube TV isnt the greatest either but an improvement on Directtv version
    Yesterday at 05:48:37 PM
  • Daddy: And your grandfather used it every year besides those two :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:49:26 PM
  • Daddy: I kept DirecTV and always willing to share. But thats my point.
    Yesterday at 05:49:47 PM
  • Daddy: If i had 3 monitors rather than two or four rather than two, either me or moms save money. Lots of it.
    Yesterday at 05:50:26 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea your point is just wrong is all. Theyve gotten into my pockets directly and indirectly
    Yesterday at 05:51:03 PM
  • Daddy: Oh, i was unaware. DTV must have got us all.
    Yesterday at 05:51:55 PM
  • Daddy: I know you dont endorse them. Never did. I paid for lots of crap i never used. Just for NFL Sunday Ticket.
    Yesterday at 05:52:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont and didnt endorse cable period. The irony is streaming is becoming cable now.
    Yesterday at 05:55:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I paid for directtv version 1-2 years when i had my apartment. Not as much as the 35+ crowd but they did
    Yesterday at 05:56:34 PM
  • Daddy: Still never watched a game on YouTube. I miss the days of CBS = AFC >> FOX/NBC = NFC >> ABC = MNF
    Yesterday at 05:56:42 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: There was no reason to have directtv outside of sunday ticket. My apartment couldnt get it so i paid ONLY for sunday ticket
    Yesterday at 05:57:04 PM
  • Daddy: I was ok with TNF & SNF.
    Yesterday at 05:57:43 PM
  • Daddy: Its all over the place now. So ive stuck with what i know. The Ticket. I can't miss a Rams game. Not gonna do it.
    Yesterday at 05:58:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Now they stream some games only on amazon and peacock. I need a streaming lawsuit
    Yesterday at 06:01:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Dont forget disney + soon u will stream games pn their
    Yesterday at 09:43:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Disney trying yo buy nfl network and using espn as part of the trade off nfl will own a certain % of espn. First deal eas 70m for nfl network but nfl turned that down real quick
    Yesterday at 09:46:43 PM
  • indiansnation: Anyone want to talk trade nfl live,mlb live,fgm,armchair
    Yesterday at 10:00:02 PM
  • indiansnation: And any other league that im in that i didnt post yet
    Yesterday at 10:00:35 PM
  • Daddy: They keep throwing insane money at the NFL to televise games and owners share those shiny pennies just enough with the players.
    Yesterday at 10:39:25 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I'm available.  Not sure if we match up anywhere other than NHL Live, but let me know if there's something you're interested in @Brian
    Yesterday at 10:45:39 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: The other leagues for me are FGM, MLB Live and DNHL in case any-one else is looking to do a deal
    Yesterday at 10:49:01 PM
  • Daddy: Healthy mix. Couple baseball, couple hockey, different scoring options.
    Yesterday at 11:08:15 PM
  • Daddy: You probably kick ass in all of them although NHL LIVE hasnt officially started.
    Yesterday at 11:08:42 PM
  • Daddy: I respect your gaming options
    Yesterday at 11:09:54 PM
  • Daddy: I would for sure be an FGM or Armchair owner if i were here for baseball. Powerhouse too. Why not? Great leagues with better LMs.
    Yesterday at 11:16:38 PM
  • Daddy: DNHL must be 15 years old. Gotta be doing something right. Most leagues dont make it past 5. Very few make it 10.
    Yesterday at 11:20:45 PM
  • Daddy: I think Rob been running that league longer than ive been on profsl. Legendary LM.
    Yesterday at 11:22:42 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 pm important messave about armchair
    Yesterday at 11:45:05 PM
  • jmntl82: indiansnation-replied
    Yesterday at 11:48:26 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: thanks @daddy.  I hold my own
    Today at 12:05:43 AM
  • Braves155: Will be around today for deal talks - ANY sport
    Today at 10:12:32 AM
  • Daddy: You tellem @Braves!
    Today at 11:47:14 AM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves PM
    Today at 03:04:47 PM
  • Braves155: Back
    Today at 03:10:34 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Back
    Today at 03:19:17 PM
  • Daddy: Better be glad Buc dont know hockey. He'd be IndianaPuc on yall asses.
    Today at 03:54:00 PM