0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I would not mind helping out at all. However; I think most of you know how many dynasty leagues I'm in and I've seen every kind of trade committee you could imagine. I propose this. On a simple player A for player B trade there should not need to be a committe to say yea or nay. If it's one that seems off kilter in any kind of way then Colby would select three (active) random GM's to vote on the trade. The random GM's are NEVER to be released and will only be known by themselves and Colby. Then if a trade is shot down the two trading GM's have no one to "point the finger" at per se. Thoughts???
Since you will be overviewing trades, as well as TC votes, you really do have the final say, Colby. I would like to have you as the TC's failsafe. It's a pretty big power to have, but you are not one to abuse such a power. My request would like to have 5 members on TC, 3 of which are designated official with 2 substitutes, with Colby as commissioned overseer of TC, with the power to override TC approvals or denials based on his final judgment. This will prevent any collusion between TC members, should there ever be a case of "you do this trade, then we can do this."
I'll agree to this. All trades have been extremely fair so far, but we must do everything we can to avoid any collusion or uneven advantages. One trade is all it takes for some members to cause an uproar. I'll also agree that a three member committee is sufficient, although we should also include 2 substitute members, should TC members wish to trade with themselves.