0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
hmmm, I thought that was done already...Let me get a timeline put together. Anything else I might be missing?
So here is my thought. Most teams played 70 games so 4/5ths of the season. so lets say rounded % wise 20% 25000 x 20% = 30000With that in mind, 19/20 seasons numbers should be multiplied by 30000 18/19 seasons numbers should continue to use 25000 Calculate both, use whichever number is greatest. This seems to me to be the best way to handle the deflated game numbers of 19/20 by inflating the denominator. It would still account for players injuries without getting all complicated. ---------------Thoughts? Is there any holes here?
So here is my thought. Most teams played 70 games so 4/5ths of the season. so lets say rounded % wise 20% 25000 x 20% = 30000With that in mind, 19/20 seasons numbers should be multiplied by 30000 18/19 seasons numbers should continue to use 25000 Calculate both, use whichever number is greatest.
Is this what we're officially using? Seems like some extensions were still using the old 25k rule across the board.Cheers
I extended using 30k for 19/20 - it seems logical to do it this way. I'll wait for the others to make it official but I can't see an argument against this method.