0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A question for someone who is more familiar with the waiver process in the real MLB:Do teams typically discuss players before said teams put a player on waivers or claim him? Is that allowed?I guess I'm looking for proper protocol here, as I might be interested in a couple players on waivers, yet it seems I would want a deal in place before I make a claim, so I'm not necessarily just getting dumped on.
The answer is no, but apparently it is allowed here.
I just read a MLB article whereby the waiving team promised the team that claimed the player that they would eat a portion of the waived player's salary and later reneged. This process is definitely one of buyer beware, because Colby could not force (nor should he) the team waiving the player to live up to whatever bargain they had with the team claiming the player. That is why whether or not these discussions happen in real life is a moot topic here. Teams in real life LIE. Just ask the Yankees who thought they had a deal with the Rangers last year for Cliff Lee.
Does it really matter? With the waiver process it doesn't really make a big difference because you either have to trade with them or nobody, so you cannot drive the price up, so to speak. We just need to make all deals final, you cannot dump it. I don't really get the problem I guess. I don't get how you are arguing for allowing GM's to turn face, Roy.