0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In regards to future trades have more disclosure from the trading parties, I would be in support of that, but most GM's do a good job of that anyway. Very few trades have a trading party state 'I like the guy' as his reason of acquiring him.
I hope you guys are right. Just keep in mind that there is a big difference between bad and non-competitive. The Mets have 3 starters out of 9 on offense and 5 out of 11 for pitching. The new GM will have to be very creative in trades to be able to field a full team since starters at any position are almost non-existent at this point.
Maybe we should consider making it mandatory for all teams to fill certain starting positions on a daily basis and allow salary exemptions for replacements of injured players. In real life, you are require to field an entire team. How can we be considered a realistic league if we allow owners to field partial teams like the one being employed by the Mets? I would support a rule that states that the starting positions we have defined in the rules be manned by players in the majors.