Brewers / Braves swap Aces

[bridgestone]

I was thinking that the rule would come into effect this offseason, thus allowing me to resign him. I initially turned the deal down b/c of cost, but then I saw the prospect extension rule and thought it might be a possibility. Thats also why I posted about the subject this morning.

~MTK

It looks like the special prospect extension won't be valid on P-2010 contracts... the owners of Kendry Morales, Billy Butler, Yovani Gallardo and others must make note of this.

Another good reason why we wait until the next season for such rule changes is because a lot of moves have already been made because teams didn't want to pay the big extension price.

[bridgestone]

  I sound like I am on the RC or something (I would love to be). 

[Colby]

It looks like the two of you will have to rework this deal... moved to Invalid.

[Canada8999]

We can re-work this deal, but IMO the TC is veto'ing a lot of trades lately... maybe this is better suited for discussion on the RC board, but my impression was the TC should veto only when they sensed collusion or the trade put the interests of the league in jeopardy - not because they disagreed with the value...

[Colby]

We can re-work this deal, but IMO the TC is veto'ing a lot of trades lately... maybe this is better suited for discussion on the RC board, but my impression was the TC should veto only when they sensed collusion or the trade put the interests of the league in jeopardy - not because they disagreed with the value...

OR when they feel someone may not do the trade if they knew the rules a bit better.

[Canada8999]

OR when they feel someone may not do the trade if they knew the rules a bit better.

I absolutely agree with that part

[Mr.TradeKing]

OR when they feel someone may not do the trade if they knew the rules a bit better.

I feel like I have a decent grasp on the scoring and most rules. I was just thinking that the prospect extension would be effective this offseason.

~MTK