Author Topic: Proposal to change extension method  (Read 5219 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jmtrops

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5189
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2019, 10:46:38 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline -BA-

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5787
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2019, 10:51:39 AM »
I think this sounds great, we may need a need to work our a few minor details like what Jim stated, but I like it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5158
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2019, 10:54:30 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.
:iatp: I am in favour but let's not stampede into it for sure. Maybe push it a year.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2019, 10:57:17 AM »
But if you want something really solid take the average of the best two of the last three years. Seems like something Excel can handle.

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jmtrops

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5189
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2019, 11:08:30 AM »
I can adjust ok if I resign a bunch of the now but I would like to have an exception for the resign rule that if you resign early the value can not be lower than its current value. I have 2 of them, one would go from 4.8M to 4M and the other would go from 3.6M to 2.7M. doing these it will cut down my cap this year to 4.1M and will make me under the cap next year under the new system.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19240
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2019, 11:29:09 AM »
Yes which is why an average of the last 3 years is best.

It doesn't make sense.  If a young player gets to appear in 20 games in his first year and struggles to produce, but then pops in his second year and puts up good numbers - his renewal shouldn't be an average of those 2 seasons, it should be based on his 2nd season. The numbers would be just plain silly.  Sure, there's outliers in the best of 2 year thing - but all in all it works out pretty well.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5158
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2019, 11:32:35 AM »
It doesn't make sense.  If a young player gets to appear in 20 games in his first year and struggles to produce, but then pops in his second year and puts up good numbers - his renewal shouldn't be an average of those 2 seasons, it should be based on his 2nd season. The numbers would be just plain silly.  Sure, there's outliers in the best of 2 year thing - but all in all it works out pretty well.
Already addressed that Rob. I'm at yes on your changes....have an open mind.

Quote
Use the greater of the two values for rookies that will be signed to prospect discounts, but the average for extension values.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5158
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2019, 11:33:22 AM »
Also the top 25 extension value example posted looks based on 2018-19 only and not the best of the two years. I've done an average of the same players for the last two years but can't get my chart to drop in nicely. Would love to see one of you excel wizards chart a weighted average for the last three years (avg of best two). My facility with excel is middling but I can manage it if I have to.       
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19240
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2019, 11:36:12 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.

Jim - could you do the math to tell me what your total cap hit would be if you extended all of your players under the current rules vs the cap hit extending all your players under the new rules?

I'd then like to compare you with a few of the top teams.  I have a feeling they will suffer more than you.  And if that's the case, then I'm still OK putting you all through this right away.  If we find there's a discrepancy and teams like yours suffer more than those at the top, then I might agree with your subsequent idea of allowing extensions now without the rule of matching the existing contract value - to let teams like yours get adjusted.

I'll run some numbers on a few other teams as well. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19240
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2019, 11:38:12 AM »
Also the top 25 extension value example posted looks based on 2018-19 only and not the best of the two years. I've done an average of the same players for the last two years but can't get my chart to drop in nicely. Would love to see one of you excel wizards chart a weighted average for the last three years (avg of best two). My facility with excel is middling but I can manage it if I have to.    

That's one thing I forgot to point out - all of my extension values for comparisons sake are from 18/19 only.  I didn't feel like pulling prior numbers :/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Yes 30 picks. 1 round. Alternating picks. After pick 30 its amateur draft picks 1 & 2
    Yesterday at 07:25:01 PM
  • Daddy: So we are all on the clock once the expansion draft begins.
    Yesterday at 07:25:32 PM
  • Brent: awesome
    Yesterday at 07:27:20 PM
  • Brent: Have you decided on what cats are scored?
    Yesterday at 07:27:56 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gonna veto fair negotiations. No D level GM will be paying on A level GM contracts. Nobody will exceed the cap. No adjustments will need made to compensate league balance.
    Yesterday at 07:28:09 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent but i have not disclosed that because i have seen our ideas pop up on other sites before we get to use them.
    Yesterday at 07:28:58 PM
  • Daddy: The scoring matrix has been configured. Its deep concept H2H.
    Yesterday at 07:29:32 PM
  • Daddy: Unlike anyone else is doing anywhere else on any platform on planet Earth.
    Yesterday at 07:30:02 PM
  • Brent: Sounds good to me.
    Yesterday at 07:33:12 PM
  • Daddy: Everytime i disclose information publicly you see the topics on other sites and leagues. A lot of traffic just looking at our stuff. Thousands of views...Why yall think that is?
    Yesterday at 07:34:09 PM
  • Daddy: If you are in CCD but didnt sign up for NBA LIVE :rofl: what was the secret sauce that makes you want to "exclusively" do CCD. Tell me publicly like im asking publicly so i may learn.
    Yesterday at 08:03:25 PM
  • Daddy: When there is only one option i get it.
    Yesterday at 08:04:56 PM
  • Daddy: Maybe...just maybe.. you aint really here for competition.
    Yesterday at 08:06:19 PM
  • Daddy: For you [link]
    Yesterday at 08:10:04 PM
  • STLBlues91: Im around for any trade talks the rest of the day
    Yesterday at 08:19:30 PM
  • Daddy: My LIVE GMs got foots for all you cats. You hockey gurus, you basketball gurus, you baseball gurus, you football gurus. All of yall that whisper in the background.
    Yesterday at 08:46:16 PM
  • Daddy: I got female GMs with big ass feet in this space. Come find out.
    Yesterday at 08:47:51 PM
  • Daddy: #ChicksDigDynasty
    Yesterday at 08:54:17 PM
  • Daddy: We have a Rhino. What you got?
    Yesterday at 08:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: Sitcom Married with Children
    Yesterday at 08:58:11 PM
  • Rhino7: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 10:39:45 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Open for business.
    Yesterday at 10:41:22 PM
  • Rhino7: Fear The Gore
    Yesterday at 10:42:06 PM
  • indiansnation: Good evening all 945 pm flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 10:45:31 PM
  • indiansnation: Rhino what moving pieces in nhl live u got
    Yesterday at 10:46:13 PM
  • Rhino7: Not in hockey, idk anything about it
    Yesterday at 10:51:41 PM
  • Daddy: Not all LIVE GMs do every sport @Brian. Some do 1 or 2. You know that. Also im going to massacre your Penguins. Just wait.
    Yesterday at 11:01:11 PM
  • Daddy: Did you see who @STLBlues picked up today? Goodness.
    Yesterday at 11:03:28 PM
  • Daddy: You see that Edmonton team? When you move top assets, thats the kinds of hauls you want to get.
    Yesterday at 11:05:10 PM
  • Daddy: Check out that NHL LIVE transactions on fantrax.
    Yesterday at 11:07:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: me and edm gonna have fun drafting
    Yesterday at 11:09:28 PM
  • STLBlues91: I got a full set of picks this year that are movable
    Yesterday at 11:10:16 PM
  • Brent: I don't know anything about Hockey.
    Yesterday at 11:14:14 PM
  • Daddy: In what league?
    Yesterday at 11:14:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent you are a vet. Your skills will carry over.
    Yesterday at 11:14:54 PM
  • Daddy: Stats, age, contract, google.
    Yesterday at 11:15:12 PM
  • Daddy: You will be a playoff team just because you're one of the best "Dynasty Fantasy" GMs mother Earth has birthed.
    Yesterday at 11:16:11 PM
  • Daddy: I personally would welcome the challenge of learning an entirely new sport within the confounds of dynasty fantasy arena. Its fun and if you dont win at first so what.
    Yesterday at 11:17:50 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, that's why I took on the challenge.  I'll learn and figure out how I want to build this Predators team.
    Yesterday at 11:19:20 PM
  • Daddy: I like the Preds
    Yesterday at 11:19:43 PM
  • Daddy: You will love NHL LIVE i guarantee it. Wait till those bullets start getting fired.
    Yesterday at 11:20:30 PM
  • jmntl82: Kings are in the same boat, NHL is a new landscape for me to traverse
    Yesterday at 11:46:36 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 p!
    Yesterday at 11:48:57 PM
  • indiansnation: pm
    Yesterday at 11:49:03 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys rumor flying that their might be a new hockey league coming out.Major League Hockey (MLH) is determined to be the next big thing in the sport. Looking to launch in the fall of 2024, MLH is looking for early star power to give their league some buzz and legitimacy.
    Today at 12:17:21 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Today at 12:34:39 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlh is a 3 v3 version of nhl
    Today at 12:35:42 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Today at 12:36:49 AM
  • Daddy: They will go bankrupt after the first year :rofl: :rofl:
    Today at 12:38:58 AM
  • Daddy: I bet this was Sidney Crosby's idea.
    Today at 12:42:22 AM