Author Topic: +/- Obsolete Stat?  (Read 847 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
+/- Obsolete Stat?
« on: December 14, 2017, 11:15:43 PM »
Has there been a conversation about doing away with the +/- stat? It is a poor metric for today's game! 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19225
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2017, 08:37:03 AM »
 We haven't discussed it. I disagree that it's obsolete though.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3242
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2017, 09:49:04 AM »
I think with the onslaught of advanced metrics +/- and pitcher wins have really gotten crapped on.  If you are on the ice for a goal against that is a bad thing and most likely had a hand in giving up the goal, not always, but certainly most of the time.  The opposite is true as well.  If you are a high possession player that has a garbage +/- that might mean your unlucky, but it more probably means your team and you suck at defending. 

Having said that if we could swap +/- for a game score rating that would be rad.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Champion :CAR-NHL:
[Dynasty NHL :PIT-NHL:]
[ProFSL Dynasty Hockey :PIT-NHL:]

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19225
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2017, 10:00:54 AM »
If we're going to discuss this, here's a little data.  I also setup a dummy league removing this stat so if there's any player you want to compare let me know.  Or I can invite you to the dummy league.  Corey - I don't see GSR in the Fantrax scoring options.  Snuggy - is there something equivalent that I'm missing?

Top 100 players (current settings)
Player   FPts   FP/G
Ovechkin, Alex   171.3   5.19
Kucherov, Nikita   169.4   5.46
Schenn, Brayden   163.3   4.95
Tarasenko, Vladimir   152.1   4.61
Stamkos, Steven   148.5   4.79
Kopitar, Anze   144.5   4.52
Schwartz, Jaden   142.2   4.74
Tavares, John   137.75   4.3
Kessel, Phil   133.6   4.05
Brown, Dustin   133.55   4.17
Gaudreau, Johnny   132.45   4.14
Couturier, Sean   132.4   4.27
McDavid, Connor   132   4.12
Lee, Anders   130.1   4.07
Scheifele, Mark   129.4   4.04
Forsberg, Filip   127.25   4.1
Benn, Jamie   125.45   3.92
Wheeler, Blake   124.55   3.89
Voracek, Jakub   123.7   3.99
Trocheck, Vincent   123.35   3.85
Kane, Evander   122.85   3.84
Monahan, Sean   122.35   3.82
Point, Brayden   121.15   3.91
MacKinnon, Nathan   120.5   3.89
Seguin, Tyler   120.1   3.75
Giroux, Claude   119.2   3.85
Toffoli, Tyler   115.25   3.6
Crosby, Sidney   114.3   3.46
Kane, Patrick   114.1   3.57
Namestnikov, Vladislav   114.1   3.68
Hall, Taylor   113.55   3.78
Stone, Mark   113.55   3.78
Staal, Eric   113.5   3.66
Kuznetsov, Evgeny   112.65   3.41
Matthews, Auston   112.05   4.31
Pastrnak, David   111.25   3.84
Boeser, Brock   110.75   3.82
Bailey, Josh   109.6   3.42
Zucker, Jason   109.6   3.54
Barkov, Aleksander   108.5   3.5
Kadri, Nazem   108.35   3.28
Anderson, Josh   108.2   3.61
Karlsson, William   107.8   3.48
Marchessault, Jonathan   106.95   3.82
Laine, Patrik   106.55   3.33
Huberdeau, Jonathan   106.4   3.33
Couture, Logan   105.9   3.53
Neal, James   105.6   3.41
Doughty, Drew   105.2   3.29
Ehlers, Nikolaj   102.3   3.2
Grabner, Michael   99.9   3.22
Arvidsson, Viktor   99.85   3.22
Pietrangelo, Alex   99.75   3.33
Panarin, Artemi   99.3   3.1
Marchand, Brad   97.7   4.65
Hornqvist, Patric   96.3   3.21
Lucic, Milan   96.1   3
Malkin, Evgeni   95.35   3.29
Barzal, Mathew   94.75   2.96
van Riemsdyk, James   94.35   2.95
Oshie, T.J.   93.9   3.35
Gallagher, Brendan   93.85   2.93
DeBrincat, Alex   93.5   2.92
Josi, Roman   91.9   3.28
Palat, Ondrej   91.85   2.96
Buchnevich, Pavel   91.65   2.96
Landeskog, Gabriel   91.6   3.39
Toews, Jonathan   91.35   2.85
Smith, Reilly   90.9   2.93
Eberle, Jordan   90.35   2.82
Bergeron, Patrice   90.05   3.75
Smith, Craig   90.05   2.9
Faksa, Radek   90   2.9
Radulov, Alexander   89.9   2.81
Guentzel, Jake   89.35   2.71
Sergachev, Mikhail   89.15   2.88
Werenski, Zach   89.15   2.79
Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan   88.4   2.76
Perron, David   88.35   3.53
Kreider, Chris   87.8   2.83
Gibbons, Brian   87.75   2.83
Skinner, Jeff   87.55   2.92
Pearson, Tanner   87.45   2.73
Muzzin, Jake   86.9   2.72
Pacioretty, Max   86.55   2.7
Zuccarello, Mats   86.55   2.79
Marleau, Patrick   86.45   2.62
Klingberg, John   86.25   2.7
Ferland, Micheal   86.1   2.78
Backstrom, Nicklas   85.85   2.68
Gourde, Yanni   85.85   2.77
Nylander, William   85.1   2.58
Saad, Brandon   85   2.66
Subban, P.K.   84.95   2.74
Horvat, Bo   84.8   3.03
Bjorkstrand, Oliver   84.6   2.64
Haula, Erik   84.55   3.13
Mantha, Anthony   84.55   2.73
Staal, Jordan   84.3   2.81

Top 100 players (removing +/-)
Player   FPts   FP/G
Ovechkin, Alex   165.3   5.01
Kucherov, Nikita   160.4   5.17
Schenn, Brayden   140.3   4.25
Stamkos, Steven   136.5   4.4
Tarasenko, Vladimir   136.1   4.12
Tavares, John   135.75   4.24
Kessel, Phil   134.6   4.08
Kane, Evander   130.85   4.09
Kopitar, Anze   130.5   4.08
Lee, Anders   130.1   4.07
Gaudreau, Johnny   128.45   4.01
Trocheck, Vincent   128.35   4.01
McDavid, Connor   127   3.97
Benn, Jamie   123.45   3.86
MacKinnon, Nathan   122.5   3.95
Scheifele, Mark   121.4   3.79
Seguin, Tyler   121.1   3.78
Wheeler, Blake   120.55   3.77
Crosby, Sidney   120.3   3.65
Forsberg, Filip   120.25   3.88
Couturier, Sean   119.4   3.85
Schwartz, Jaden   119.2   3.97
Brown, Dustin   118.55   3.7
Monahan, Sean   118.35   3.7
Voracek, Jakub   117.7   3.8
Hall, Taylor   117.55   3.92
Kane, Patrick   115.1   3.6
Pastrnak, David   113.25   3.91
Kuznetsov, Evgeny   112.65   3.41
Boeser, Brock   110.75   3.82
Giroux, Claude   110.2   3.55
Laine, Patrik   107.55   3.36
Stone, Mark   107.55   3.58
Bailey, Josh   106.6   3.33
Barkov, Aleksander   106.5   3.44
Huberdeau, Jonathan   106.4   3.33
Point, Brayden   106.15   3.42
Namestnikov, Vladislav   106.1   3.42
Staal, Eric   105.5   3.4
Ehlers, Nikolaj   104.3   3.26
Toffoli, Tyler   104.25   3.26
Neal, James   103.6   3.34
Zucker, Jason   102.6   3.31
Kadri, Nazem   102.35   3.1
Marchessault, Jonathan   101.95   3.64
Couture, Logan   100.9   3.36
Karlsson, William   100.8   3.25
Hornqvist, Patric   99.3   3.31
Anderson, Josh   99.2   3.31
Matthews, Auston   99.05   3.81
van Riemsdyk, James   98.35   3.07
Guentzel, Jake   97.35   2.95
Malkin, Evgeni   97.35   3.36
Gallagher, Brendan   95.85   3
Skinner, Jeff   95.55   3.19
Keller, Clayton   95.35   2.8
Pacioretty, Max   94.55   2.95
Mantha, Anthony   93.55   3.02
Panarin, Artemi   93.3   2.92
Oshie, T.J.   92.9   3.32
Radulov, Alexander   92.9   2.9
Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan   92.4   2.89
Lucic, Milan   92.1   2.88
Eichel, Jack   91.9   2.87
Arvidsson, Viktor   91.85   2.96
Doughty, Drew   91.2   2.85
Buchnevich, Pavel   90.65   2.92
Barzal, Mathew   89.75   2.8
DeBrincat, Alex   89.5   2.8
Hoffman, Mike   89.3   2.98
Smith, Craig   89.05   2.87
Rantanen, Mikko   88.9   2.87
Kreider, Chris   88.8   2.86
Ekman-Larsson, Oliver   88.5   2.6
Eberle, Jordan   88.35   2.76
Ferland, Micheal   88.1   2.84
Leddy, Nick   88.05   2.75
Grabner, Michael   87.9   2.84
Josi, Roman   87.9   3.14
Marchand, Brad   87.7   4.18
Marleau, Patrick   87.45   2.65
Letang, Kris   86.6   2.62
Toews, Jonathan   86.35   2.7
Zibanejad, Mika   86.3   3.6
Simmonds, Wayne   86   2.77
Pietrangelo, Alex   85.75   2.86
Landeskog, Gabriel   85.6   3.17
Maroon, Patrick   85.1   2.66
Smith, Reilly   84.9   2.74
Haula, Erik   84.55   3.13
Staal, Jordan   84.3   2.81
Burns, Brent   84.1   2.8
O'Reilly, Ryan   83.8   2.62
Rakell, Rickard   83.75   3.1
Zuccarello, Mats   83.55   2.7
Larkin, Dylan   83.4   2.69
Perron, David   83.35   3.33
Stastny, Paul   83.2   2.52
Werenski, Zach   83.15   2.6
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19225
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2017, 10:07:30 AM »
The most drastic differences are obviously with the best and worst +/- guys.  Those STL forwards with incredible numbers this year take a pretty big FP dip (20-30 points this year).  Meanwhile a guy like OEL who is notoriously bad in +/- would see a decent bump in production. 

Though based on what I'm seeing, I think Slack is right (at least from a fantasy perspective, I still appreciate +/- in real life even though others don't).  However, it's really not a huge factor in our scoring. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2017, 10:29:00 AM »
The most drastic differences are obviously with the best and worst +/- guys.  Those STL forwards with incredible numbers this year take a pretty big FP dip (20-30 points this year).  Meanwhile a guy like OEL who is notoriously bad in +/- would see a decent bump in production. 

Though based on what I'm seeing, I think Slack is right (at least from a fantasy perspective, I still appreciate +/- in real life even though others don't).  However, it's really not a huge factor in our scoring.

I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19225
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2017, 10:32:32 AM »
I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing.

We've discussed Blocked Shots in the past.  I've never been a fan of that stat even though it would help with Defensive scoring.  However, I believe I recall in prior conversations that this change would do too much to disrupt the overall scoring, and the value of certain players.  I never liked the idea.  And if we did it we'd need a long preparation period - like 2 seasons, so that GM's could prepare for that kind of change.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19225
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2017, 10:34:21 AM »
I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing.

I'm not opposed to paying for the league - never have been.  There's just been no reason to do it so far other than the Minor League stats which we enable in the offseason anyway.  I kinda wish I bought that lifetime membership they offered a couple years ago.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2017, 10:41:37 AM »
I'm not opposed to paying for the league - never have been.  There's just been no reason to do it so far other than the Minor League stats which we enable in the offseason anyway.  I kinda wish I bought that lifetime membership they offered a couple years ago.

You and me both... Really wished i had bought it....
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2017, 04:23:06 PM »
As a former player, and now fan, +/- is still important and I don't think it should be taken out. It's always been a part of any league I'm in, H2H or points.
In our pts league here, I was surprised to see not a ton difference in the rankings. I know for my team on quick glance, EK's +/- is horrible this year and his fp/g take a hit because of it, same with Kris Letang. For the majority of players though, I don't see it as a big deal. There aren't going to be half your team of + or - 35 players at the end of the season unless you're really lucky/unlucky. An you generally know what a guy's +/- will be. OEL has always been poor, and heading into this year you could have predicted that for COL and ARI players probably at least.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • BayAreaBallers: i hope phillies choke this lead
    Yesterday at 07:34:08 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Ask and I shall receive way to go giants
    Yesterday at 07:47:52 PM
  • Daddy: Playing Cleveland this week... I will catch SF later.
    Yesterday at 08:13:52 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: srry daddy as a giants fan we needed to win this game vs yall
    Yesterday at 08:24:12 PM
  • Daddy: Ditto LIVE. Youre in a remarkable battle. Revenge to me comes in whatever way i can get it. :rofl:
    Yesterday at 08:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey is coming. A new battlefield.
    Yesterday at 08:30:53 PM
  • Daddy: Who wants my picks? :rofl:
    Yesterday at 08:31:23 PM
  • indiansnation: I want your hockey picks
    Yesterday at 08:46:56 PM
  • Daddy: I would only trade them to LA and LA has no current profsl owner.
    Yesterday at 08:48:11 PM
  • Daddy: Some outside talent dont like the site by looks alone and we are very manual. Its an acquired taste.
    Yesterday at 08:50:10 PM
  • indiansnation: U suck lol
    Yesterday at 08:50:39 PM
  • Daddy: On site hockey talent are "get off my lawn" types that aren't interested in seeing what all the fuss is about. And Brian we can talk but i dont want Grandpa Sid.
    Yesterday at 08:52:29 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton could get my picks
    Yesterday at 08:53:05 PM
  • Daddy: He talking McDavid type talk. Me like Connor.
    Yesterday at 08:53:34 PM
  • Daddy: All those junior hockey dudes we looked up and put on yalls rosters. I dont know them dudes. I might cut half them jokers.
    Yesterday at 08:56:49 PM
  • Daddy: Ive learned more about global hockey in the last 3 months than i knew my entire life. My brains are scrambled. STLBlues91- brains are scrambled. Fried man.
    Yesterday at 08:58:38 PM
  • Daddy: On to Basketball :)
    Yesterday at 08:59:13 PM
  • Daddy: You have an NHL team. An AHL team. And a 50 player Junior league development squad. In a legit 30 Category dynasty hockey contract league.
    Yesterday at 09:02:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve never seen anything like that. Nobody has ever seen anything like that. Not in Dynasty hockey. You're welcome. ;)
    Yesterday at 09:03:16 PM
  • Daddy: Franchise? That's what a Franchise looks like.
    Yesterday at 09:07:12 PM
  • STLBlues91: Working on the matching now between spreadsheet/fantrax. My head hurts but got about 12 of them fully done and believe they are 100% good to go. Taking a dinner break and back to plugging in info
    Yesterday at 09:15:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be back in 20 minutes all pms have been answered
    Yesterday at 09:18:31 PM
  • indiansnation: I feel bad for stlblues91 this guy is busting his but getting everything ready for NFL live
    Yesterday at 11:53:15 PM
  • indiansnation: Watching Dallas stars comeback and beat edm
    Yesterday at 11:54:24 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im happy to see teh stars doing that for my boi pavs
    Today at 12:03:46 AM
  • indiansnation: That had to be one of the best hockey playoff games I seen this yr
    Today at 12:32:34 AM
  • indiansnation: Anybody want to talk trade
    Today at 12:33:26 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: stars are a tough team
    Today at 12:33:29 AM
  • indiansnation: It was just amazing how Edmonton was leading and then all of a sudden 2 period starts and Dallas just took over after that and just kicked Edmonton ass
    Today at 12:35:55 AM
  • Daddy: Flyers have the 12th overall pick & whatever Florida finishes with.
    Today at 01:09:39 AM
  • Daddy: We are open for business.
    Today at 01:10:32 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: sharks could be interested in those picks
    Today at 01:16:53 AM
  • STLBlues91: STL will be open for business as well
    Today at 01:23:26 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Daddy are you intending to trade all of your picks in NHL as well or different strategy there?
    Today at 11:25:13 AM
  • indiansnation: Penguins our interested in tradeing
    Today at 01:21:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Cris ive got 3 first rounders including 2025. Ive got 11 draft picks for the first time in years.
    Today at 01:39:03 PM
  • Daddy: Them babies burning a hole in my pocket. :)
    Today at 01:39:21 PM
  • Daddy: Its not that i dont like them but i want to add specific things and idk how the draft will shake out, also there are always teams wanting to invest heavy.
    Today at 01:40:27 PM
  • Daddy: We usually match in what our needs are. Then i see those teams stack like twenty picks and make magic. While i make my own magic.
    Today at 01:41:29 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid deserves a haul. If Edmonton is moving him. Philly is armed to the teeth.
    Today at 01:42:13 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton would also be armed to the teeth. Our draft is just a few days after the real one. We aint got time to ho hum. Its bout to be go time.
    Today at 01:44:09 PM
  • Daddy: You interested in The Flyers draft picks. I need names. I need pms. By 6/2 my picks will belong to some very fortunate franchise.
    Today at 01:47:39 PM
  • Daddy: Some of you guys have known me for fourteen years or more. I am a very reliable source for draft picks no matter the sport.
    Today at 01:55:39 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: what exactly are u looking for
    Today at 01:59:10 PM
  • Daddy: Depends on the team. Each one has something different. G, C, D, Crap we need wingers, i prefer guys that play both LW/RW. Im looking to improve. Thats always what im looking for. But to do so in a way that my partner also improves.
    Today at 02:02:32 PM
  • Daddy: You can build a dominant team without dominating every trade or even any trade. Doesn't matter what you give up if you get what you see as a key piece.
    Today at 02:03:49 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton and LA are the leaders for my picks. LA unfortunately has no GM and by the time one sacs up im going to probably have dealt.
    Today at 02:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: You know we speak like this is boxing. Like there is a physical contest and you here me joking about foots etc. but we including myself are couch jockeys.
    Today at 02:08:39 PM
  • Daddy: Smack talk comes with sports. Ask about Kobe. Ask about Jordan. Ask about most of the greats. We are boxing gents. Mental boxing. From our phones and computers.
    Today at 02:09:52 PM
  • Daddy: I dont mean to bruise anyone's vagina. I cant help myself. Im a habitual vagina bruiser. Sincerely.
    Today at 02:11:08 PM