0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I like the idea of getting rid of a set TC and I think we should make it league wide votes. We have a lot of good tenured managers here and I think more people should get a say instead of the same 5 or 6 people every year. I also think trades should be looked at as whats best for the league and not if someone thinks they could have gotten more or not. If a trade is between two owners that have a plan they should be able to run their team the way they want. I've most likely made more trades than anyone the last couple of years and I pride myself on making good fair deals. Different people have different opinions which is fine but I think opening up votes to the whole league would be a welcomed change.I'm all for doing a little research on a new owner. I don't think penalties for lopsided trades will work as it will lead to more aggravation and most likely more turnover.
A TC is veryimpprtant to stop two teams from colluding. Doesnt happen in real life, or does it...
I don't think we need a TC to see if two teams are colluding. This league is pretty established and we know each other pretty well. I think we need to just look at the parameters of why a trade should be vetoed or not.
I'm in this boat. Just need to make sure TC understand parameters for vetoing. "You could've gotten more" isn't a good reason. With varying salaries and caps and prospects in a league like this there are a lot of factors to consider other than strictly the talent involved so trades are very specific to a team's roster construction or owner's future plan. So trades should only be vetoed on what looks like extreme negligence or collusion IMO.