0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Am new to the league so still to fully experience the process working. However if we are revisiting the rules, then I agree with the proposed idea of moving to the need for at least two, rather than one, initial vetoes. Requiring just one seems to much of a hostage to fortune, and two would, hopefully, make the process more effective and consistent.
So a trade still passes if there are no vetoes after 48 hours? If there is a veto within 48 hours then a 70% vote is needed to pass? I'd still like there to be a minimum 2 or 3 vetoes. In fact I think a majority is the best way to go, if two vetoes then three yes votes to pass. I don't think one owner should be allowed to derail a trade by himself.
70% works for me and is the basis of my trade ideology anyway. But for those of you like the numbers here its in black and white.Total App VoteVote Need %13 10 77% - So basically you can see here (3 vetoes and it usually won't pass just like I said)