If the net cash exchange were changed to $10m I would change my vote from no cash exchanges allowed to voting for $10m net cash exchanges.
If everyone else voted the same (no cash exchanges or allowing cash exchanges) the vote would then be 9 for no cash exchanges and 11 for net cash exchanges of $10m.
If we did a revote at $10m net cash exchange instead of $25m net cash exchanges as an option and no cash exchanges as the other I think everyone that voted for $25m net cash exchanges would vote for $10m net cash exchanges, while myself and possibly others would change our votes to $10m net cash exchanges from no cash exchanges, therefore causing $10m net cash exchanges to win the vote.
$10m net cash exchanges mostly gives the no cash exchange group what they want in league parity and balance and cuts down on most of the circumventing of the cap, while it gives the net $25m cash exchange group what they want in not wanting cash exchanges to go away. I think it would probably work for the majority of managers.