Author Topic: Rule change Proposal - ARB Extensions  (Read 4159 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EastCoastGonzo

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 6133
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Rule change Proposal - ARB Extensions
« on: January 03, 2024, 01:14:28 PM »
Here is my rule change proposal for extensions. A lot of people have asked about doing extensions for ARB players. The trouble is doing that in a way that it confers a benefit on the manager and is realistic enough to not destroy competitive balance. The proposal:

Once a player has 1 year of Armchair service time, so is beginning a season as an ARB2 player they will eligible for an ARB extension depending on their service time, using the extension table. Examples below:

An ARB2 player can receive: 9 yr extension at 90% of their respective positions extension amount listed on the extension table.

ARB3 / 8 yrs at 95%

ARB4 / 7 yrs at 97%

ARB5 / 6 yrs at 100%

ARB6 / 5 yrs at 110%

FA / up to 5 yrs at x% (extension value determined normally)

So an example. Say you have a pitcher who you believe will be a rockstar, he finishes his rookie season and you decide to take the gamble and lock him up in a monster extension. His extension would be 9yrs / $8,800,000 = 79M. I think it balances the risk and reward correctly. You forego the cost saves of ARB2-3 for cost certainty in the future, and protection against a real life ARB number that may be 15M+ if he really is that good. If he pans out you get an ace for a below market rate, if he doesn't that's the risk you take but it won't be so terrible as to destroy your team.

I think trying to lock up a player right before he goes into FA should be costly, you have to pay them to forgo FA. But for certain teams it would be advantages, if for example the following off-season they would have 3 players eligible for extensions and wanted to keep all three, they could sign one to an above market extension before hand.

Players who receive an ARB Extension would not be eligible to be traded until the trade deadline of year 3 of their extension. So if you were to give a player an extension this off-season he could not be traded until June - August 2026. The rules for a normal FA Extension would not change, you could still trade that player after June 1 of that same year.

Extensions would still be limited to 2 per off-season, including 1 ARB Extension.

The extension years posted are fixed, so you could not do a ARB2 extension for say 4 years, it must be 9.


This rule change may require us to adjust how much or how salary is traded among teams.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 01:31:10 PM by EastCoastGonzo »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Shannonlwalker2

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 1399
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIA-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :ANA:
    • :Florida:
    • :LAD:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change Proposal - ARB Extensions
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2024, 02:04:27 PM »
Voted NO:  the competitive balance is already pretty skewed.   There are 10 teams that are good.  10-15 that are pretty lousy ( for 1 reason or another), and 5 teams are floating around mediocrity.  I feel the good managers will just continue to further the divide by locking up the best young talent for years (at significant discounts).  If the this WAS to play out, then I think it would be even harder to keep and find owners for the teams that are so far behind.
 Just conjecture on my part: if we want a truly competitive league. This should probably be tabled until we (the league) can secure descent, active, and consistent managers for all the teams in the league.


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline EastCoastGonzo

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 6133
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change Proposal - ARB Extensions
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2024, 02:08:18 PM »
I hear what you're saying @Shannonlwalker2 but that split you described is pretty much how real MLB is, and I think that means that we are reflecting reality pretty well lol.

But I get what you're saying. I proposed this to try and address something people have been asking for for a couple years. I don't necessarily have a problem waiting to make it happen. Or even adjusting it.

The teams that don't have owners aren't as bad off as they seems anymore they all have average farms. In fact if we're being honest it's some of the owned teams that are way off at the bottom of the league...
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
Shannonlwalker2,
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Same
    Yesterday at 03:50:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yes daddy well said mental health should be talked about more
    Yesterday at 04:18:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: It really puts things into perspective
    Yesterday at 04:19:39 PM
  • Psychpop: @STLBlues91.  Who are you thinking of moving in a trade?
    Yesterday at 05:13:46 PM
  • Braves155: Looking to deal in any sport
    Yesterday at 05:18:11 PM
  • Braves155: PM Jwalker
    Yesterday at 05:19:33 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back braves
    Yesterday at 05:24:45 PM
  • Braves155: Replied
    Yesterday at 05:29:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalker pm
    Yesterday at 06:02:59 PM
  • Daddy: What two LIVE GMs will make the next deal? One thing i know for sure, the wait wont be long.
    Yesterday at 06:04:01 PM
  • Braves155: They like to come in bunches!
    Yesterday at 06:05:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: you might get one shortly if things progress
    Yesterday at 06:06:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalker replied
    Yesterday at 06:19:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back BAB
    Yesterday at 06:33:24 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: back at ya jwalker
    Yesterday at 06:34:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Daddy your wwait wont me much longer
    Yesterday at 07:39:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: deal abt to be posted here soon
    Yesterday at 07:39:43 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: there u have it teh 2 superbowl teams have made a deal
    Yesterday at 07:48:33 PM
  • Rhino7: :toast:
    Yesterday at 07:50:49 PM
  • dbreer23: Acuna to miss the rest of 2024 - torn ACL in left knee (last time was his right knee0
    Yesterday at 11:41:43 PM
  • jimw: Wow, he had said he thought it wasn't that serious.  I hope he can overcome these knee injuries
    Today at 12:41:59 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Jimw pm sent
    Today at 01:17:16 AM
  • STLBlues91: im around the rest of the day
    Today at 03:08:45 PM
  • Daddy: Acuna fantasy owners world round didn't want to hear that. Not sure who has him in LIVE but its universally devastating news for Acuna fans.
    Today at 03:30:59 PM
  • Daddy: Anyone feeling down, can perk up because the Philadelphia Phillies are good at baseball.
    Today at 03:32:54 PM
  • Daddy: I feel better already.
    Today at 03:33:50 PM
  • indiansnation: Good afternoon all
    Today at 04:00:17 PM
  • indiansnation: It is 3:20pm and the phillies still suck.
    Today at 04:17:18 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i hope phillies choke this lead
    Today at 07:34:08 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Ask and I shall receive way to go giants
    Today at 07:47:52 PM
  • Daddy: Playing Cleveland this week... I will catch SF later.
    Today at 08:13:52 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: srry daddy as a giants fan we needed to win this game vs yall
    Today at 08:24:12 PM
  • Daddy: Ditto LIVE. Youre in a remarkable battle. Revenge to me comes in whatever way i can get it. :rofl:
    Today at 08:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey is coming. A new battlefield.
    Today at 08:30:53 PM
  • Daddy: Who wants my picks? :rofl:
    Today at 08:31:23 PM
  • indiansnation: I want your hockey picks
    Today at 08:46:56 PM
  • Daddy: I would only trade them to LA and LA has no current profsl owner.
    Today at 08:48:11 PM
  • Daddy: Some outside talent dont like the site by looks alone and we are very manual. Its an acquired taste.
    Today at 08:50:10 PM
  • indiansnation: U suck lol
    Today at 08:50:39 PM
  • Daddy: On site hockey talent are "get off my lawn" types that aren't interested in seeing what all the fuss is about. And Brian we can talk but i dont want Grandpa Sid.
    Today at 08:52:29 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton could get my picks
    Today at 08:53:05 PM
  • Daddy: He talking McDavid type talk. Me like Connor.
    Today at 08:53:34 PM
  • Daddy: All those junior hockey dudes we looked up and put on yalls rosters. I dont know them dudes. I might cut half them jokers.
    Today at 08:56:49 PM
  • Daddy: Ive learned more about global hockey in the last 3 months than i knew my entire life. My brains are scrambled. STLBlues91- brains are scrambled. Fried man.
    Today at 08:58:38 PM
  • Daddy: On to Basketball :)
    Today at 08:59:13 PM
  • Daddy: You have an NHL team. An AHL team. And a 50 player Junior league development squad. In a legit 30 Category dynasty hockey contract league.
    Today at 09:02:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve never seen anything like that. Nobody has ever seen anything like that. Not in Dynasty hockey. You're welcome. ;)
    Today at 09:03:16 PM
  • Daddy: Franchise? That's what a Franchise looks like.
    Today at 09:07:12 PM
  • STLBlues91: Working on the matching now between spreadsheet/fantrax. My head hurts but got about 12 of them fully done and believe they are 100% good to go. Taking a dinner break and back to plugging in info
    Today at 09:15:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be back in 20 minutes all pms have been answered
    Today at 09:18:31 PM