Dynasty NHL

Home :: Fantrax :: Rules :: Transactions :: History



::
::

Author Topic: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest  (Read 3369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dedreger

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 1736
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :NYR:
    • :Illinois:
    • :BVB:
    • :WAS:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2017, 07:07:42 PM »
1)   Vancouver
2)   St. Louis
3)   Boston
4)   Winnipeg
5)   Colorado
6)   Edmonton
7)   Buffalo
8)   Carolina
9)   Anaheim
10)   Montreal
11)   Toronto
12)   Detroit
13)   Washington
14)   Pittsburgh
15)   Philadelphia
16)   Vegas
17)   Tampa Bay
18)   Chicago
19)   New York
20)   Arizona

Tiebreaker - 730
« Last Edit: September 28, 2017, 10:45:23 PM by dedreger »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Anthony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 10065
  • Bonus inPoints: 10000
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2017, 09:41:50 PM »
1)   St. Louis
2)   Vancouver
3)   Winnipeg
4)   Boston
5)   Colorado
6)   Edmonton
7)   Buffalo
8)   Carolina
9)   Anaheim
10)   Montreal
11)   Philadephia
12)   Detroit
13)   Washington
14)   Toronto
15)   Chicago
16)   Vegas
17)   Pittsburgh
18)   NY Rangers
19)   Tampa Bay
20)   Arizona

Tiebreaker 699
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline izaman3

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5279
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2017, 01:20:58 PM »
1)   Vancouver
2)   St. Louis
3)   Winnipeg
4)   Carolina
5)   Buffalo
6)   Colorado
7)   Washington
8)   Edmonton
9)   Anaheim
10)   Boston
11)   Montreal
12)   Philadelphia
13)   Toronto
14)   Pittsburgh
15)   Detroit
16)   Vegas
17)   Tampa Bay
18)   Chicago
19)   New York
20)   Arizona

Tiebreaker - 763
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2017, 04:40:41 PM »
1)   St. Louis
2)   Vancouver
3)   Winnipeg
4)   Colorado
5)   Carolina
6)   Boston
7)   Buffalo
8)   Anaheim
9)   Philadelphia
10)   Edmonton
11)   Toronto
12)   Washington
13)   Pittsburgh
14)   Detroit
15)   Montreal
16)   Tampa Bay
17)   Vegas
18)   Chicago
19)   New York
20)   Arizona


Tiebreaker - 739
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2017, 07:12:59 PM »
1)   Vancouver
2)   St. Louis
3)   Winnipeg
4)   Carolina
5)   Colorado
6)   Boston
7)   Buffalo
8)   Anaheim
9)   Edmonton
10)   Philadelphia
11)   Toronto
12)   Detroit
13)   Washington
14)   Montreal
15)   Pittsburgh
16)   Tampa Bay
17)   Vegas
18)   Chicago
19)   New York
20)   Arizona

Tie Breaker - 744


May as well pump my own tires and put me 1st, although I think it's a given St.Louis takes it.

I'm also confused as to how the "conferences" thing works. As in, is it even possible this year for St.Louis and Vancouver to finish 1-2? I thought I would be in the "western conference" now.
Or is it all the teams on the left side above are one "conference" (Boston/Edmonton lines) and the teams on the right are the "eastern conference" (Carolina/Anaheim lines) ... Which doesn't makes sense given Anaheim is definitely not east haha.
Oooor... Is it Boston/Carolina in one and then Edmonton/Anaheim in another? ... Which makes more sense, but still unclear how it's all divided come playoffs.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2017, 07:27:01 PM »

May as well pump my own tires and put me 1st, although I think it's a given St.Louis takes it.

I'm also confused as to how the "conferences" thing works. As in, is it even possible this year for St.Louis and Vancouver to finish 1-2? I thought I would be in the "western conference" now.
Or is it all the teams on the left side above are one "conference" (Boston/Edmonton lines) and the teams on the right are the "eastern conference" (Carolina/Anaheim lines) ... Which doesn't makes sense given Anaheim is definitely not east haha.
Oooor... Is it Boston/Carolina in one and then Edmonton/Anaheim in another? ... Which makes more sense, but still unclear how it's all divided come playoffs.

DNHL has 4 divisions. Your team got moved into the Canada Division. Not sure where your comment about conferences is coming from.

The top team in each division makes the playoffs as the 1-4 seeds. Seeds 5 & 6 are the wildcards and get a buy from the first round. 7 plays 10 and 8 plays 9. The final order of the standings depends on who wins/loses in the playoffs. If me (St. Louis) and you (Vancouver) meet in the finals then we would finish 1st and 2nd in the final standings.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2017, 09:53:15 PM »
DNHL has 4 divisions. Your team got moved into the Canada Division. Not sure where your comment about conferences is coming from.

The top team in each division makes the playoffs as the 1-4 seeds. Seeds 5 & 6 are the wildcards and get a buy from the first round. 7 plays 10 and 8 plays 9. The final order of the standings depends on who wins/loses in the playoffs. If me (St. Louis) and you (Vancouver) meet in the finals then we would finish 1st and 2nd in the final standings.

Ah, alright. I never really figured out how the ol playoff format works because I've never made it past the 1st round it seems, haha.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2017, 09:36:30 AM »
Yea there's no conferences.  The icons above are the 4 divisions.  Left and Right are not correlated any other way.  The image below gives a clearer view:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Tyler

  • Guest
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2017, 03:45:34 PM »
1) St Louis
2) Vancouver
3) Colorado
4) Winnipeg
5) Boston
6) Carolina
7) Anaheim
8) Edmonton
9) Buffalo
10) Montreal
11) Philadelpia
12) Detroit
13) Washington
14) Toronto
15) Pittsburgh
16) Tampa Bay
17) Vegas
18) Chicago
19) New York
20) Arizona

Tiebreak - 705
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: 2017/18 Power Rankings Contest
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2018, 11:18:09 AM »
Colorado wins the Power Rankings Contest!!  For the 2nd year in a row, our Stanley Cup champ has won our Rankings contest... Perhaps we need to rethink the points we give for the Champ, since everyone picks themselves!!  In any case, congrats Snuggy!  See the initial post for details on your extension discount. 

1   :COL-NHL:   74
2   :TOR-NHL:   66
3   :PHO:   66
4   :ANA:   66
5   :MON-NHL:   65
6   :STL-NHL:   64
7   :VAN:   64
8   :BUF-NHL:   62
9   :DET-NHL:   61
10   :CHI-NHL:   59
11   :CAR-NHL:   57
12   :BOS-NHL:   57
13   :WIN:   55
14   :PHI-NHL:   52
15   :PIT-NHL:   48
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Today at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Today at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Today at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Today at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Today at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Today at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Today at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Today at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Today at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Today at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Today at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Today at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Today at 06:21:33 PM