0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This can be taken out of context if the league allows trades of questionable sort to pass. For instance, a Joe Mauer for, let's say, Jose Guillen. 'One side is in need of a catcher, the other an outfielder, so what's the problem?' the teams claim. The reality is that all players in this league do have a value, though it is never said or given. It is just a consensus value that us members, experts, even the MLB itself has on it's players. We know that the skill levels of certain players overmatch others, otherwise we would see outlandish trades all over the league. It is just a given assessment in fantasy sports. If we allow every trade to go through, what is the point of a Trade Committee then? What is the point of approving each trade if we are supposed to allow every one, every time?Two of your reasons for this trade is that you are taking on injury prone players and that there have been uneven trades in the league already. I don't see the logic in those reasonings, simply put.I understand that the Pujols deal, as well as even the Dye/Helton deal seemed very iffy to some. Looking back on it, maybe both should have been reviewed more carefully, but the decisions were made, and we cannot change that. But we have to learn to not let those trades pass, not just keep allowing them.I have not made a vote yet. Rockies and Cubs, I would like to see the Cubs receive one or two more players of some sort, and they do not have to be great, or even good, players. If that happens, I will definitely be more accepting of this trade.Other RC members, please chime in here, let the league know how each of us feel on situations like this. I'm only one member, and if I am overruled, that's totally fine, that's the game we play.
Just wanted to chime in since this seemed to be getting a bit tense. We have to remember ladies that this is just a game. That said, I am neither for or against this trade. I have no authority in this league and I am not a member of the TC. So anything I say can easily be passed off. However, I understand the trade from both perspectives - the Rocks and the Cubs, as well as the TC. Please correct me if I am wrong. The Cubs wanting to rid himself of the anchor that is Carlos Zambrano, had to give up something of value - Chris Carpenter. The Rockies in taking on Zambrano, would need something of value - Carpenter. The TC is merely saying what did the Cubs get back. In this case I think it is addition by subtraction. The Cubs now have the power to maneuver past what he was given by Jim Hendry.But, we all signed up for this league and agreed to abide by its rules. So arguing over it, doesn't make the process go smoother, it just makes things worse. For better or worse, the TC is part of the league that we joined. So if they say no, then they say no... that is what we signed up for. Also to say that Maloney is on the same level of Matusz is reaching to say the best. Maloney is a nice little pitcher, is a gutty pitcher who lacks a fastball that goes above 90. But he is a smart pitcher, and could be the Reds 5th starter in 2010. Currently he is #6 on the depth chart behind Micah Owings. Also to say that he was a top 5 pitching prospect (in the league) is also reaching. Matusz is a stud in the making and I hate to see him on my direct competitors team. Damn you again Brewers! If you are going to make an argument, or a statement like that have some facts to back it up. Which publication is this from? Here is Baseball America in 2008 - just the Reds mind you.1. Jay Bruce, of2. Homer Bailey, rhp3. Joey Votto, 1b/of4. Johnny Cueto, rhp5. Drew Stubbs, of6. Devin Mesoraco, c7. Todd Frazier, ss8. Juan Francisco, 3b9. Josh Roenicke, rhp10. Matt Maloney, lhpand Baseball Prospectus in 2008Five-Star Prospects1. Jay Bruce, CF2. Homer Bailey, RHP3. Joey Votto, 1B/OFFour-Star Prospects4. Johnny Cueto, RHPThree-Star Prospects5. Todd Frazier, INF6. Devin Mesoraco, C7. Drew Stubbs, CF8. Matt Maloney, LHP9. Kyle Lotzkar, RHP10. Juan Francisco, 3BTwo-Star Prospects11. Neftali Soto, SS