Author Topic: Questions  (Read 93623 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #550 on: June 02, 2017, 09:37:07 PM »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #551 on: June 03, 2017, 12:07:57 AM »
« Last Edit: June 03, 2017, 12:13:07 AM by Tony »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline whiteghost

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1142
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :GB:
    • :MEM:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #552 on: June 04, 2017, 07:47:58 PM »
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #553 on: June 14, 2017, 09:38:01 AM »
So when are we doing extensions and entry draft?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #554 on: June 15, 2017, 12:51:33 PM »
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #555 on: June 15, 2017, 01:03:21 PM »
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?

I like how we do it now for 2 reasons:

1) You cannot get a discount on a Stamkos-like talent where he goes down for a year with injury.  High end talent costs high end dollars, regardless of an injury OR off year.

2) Ease of use.  This has to be a factor.  This would add another variable to the extension equation, which is more work for us and for the league management.  Since I run my own league, I'm particularly sensitive about the management side.  Auditing extensions is one of the most time consuming parts of running a league like this.  Adding this element means more time spent on administration for Drew.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #556 on: June 15, 2017, 01:09:19 PM »
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:

Quote
Contract Limits
Except for any contract inherited in 2011, all contracts must be no longer than five years. Also, for a given salary, all contracts have term limits (max years contract can be per the yearly salary) as provided below.

Salary - Max Years
$5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$3.5 to $4.9m - 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 2 years

Contract Limits for Extensions
Contract extensions follow the contract maximum lengths as shown above as well as their own minimum standards.

Salary - Min & Max Years
$6.5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$5 to $6.4m - 4 or 5 years
$3.5 to $4.9m - 3 or 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 2 or 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 1 or 2 years
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #557 on: June 15, 2017, 08:20:12 PM »
Quote
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO.

Backyard's contract structure has been working nicely years. It is the differences between leagues that makes them special.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #558 on: June 16, 2017, 12:17:53 PM »
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #559 on: June 16, 2017, 12:24:10 PM »
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.

I like that idea.  Or if you don't sign a certain quality player to the max then they can't be extended again and become a UFA at the end of the contract.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Today at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Today at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Today at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Today at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Today at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Today at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Today at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Today at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Today at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Today at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Today at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Today at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Today at 06:21:33 PM