Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
Cross-Court Dynasty
Fantrax
|
Rules
|
Official Rosters
::
::
::
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
Go Down
Author
Topic: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract (Read 2062 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
DynastyDeacon
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1351
Bonus inPoints: 0
20+ Year Dynasty Veteran
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #20 on:
April 30, 2022, 09:48:51 AM »
My primary goal with my vote of #4 $10m net cash exchange is to find a reasonable compromise to save cash exchanges from being eliminated, while also allowing for a competitive league.
I really really want to keep cash exchanges. I am very frustrated with the votes for #5 because I view that as not being reasonable and therefore not being able to beat a head to head vote with no cash exchanges in a final vote. A vote for #5 is essentially a vote for no cash exchanges.
Option #5 of 25% limit of total contract still means a team can trade for stars like Anthony Davis $120m total contract (4 years at $30m) and get him fully paid in the current year. A team can trade for anyone fully paid in the current year as long as their contract is 4 years or more as that is 25%. So a team can trade for Anthony Davis fully paid this year and another star or two fully paid this year, get to $175m+ total cap, then since you can be over the salary cap in future years they can have that same team locked in (assuming all other players also on long term contracts) for the next 3 years after the current one.
25% of total contract also means rebuilding teams looking to trade decent/good players on expensive contracts cannot do so because they are limited to only 25% paid. So they cannot trade the player away or get very little in return. IE: Toronto Raptors traded Norman Powell $11.3m on an expiring contract fully paid to Oklahoma City Thunder last year. Toronto is probably stuck with Norman Powell who doesn't fit the rebuild if there is a 25% limit as the max paid could only be $2.8m (25%) so any team getting him would still have to pay $8.5m. Not many if any teams are making that trade. A net $10m would mean that Powell could go to any number of competitive teams (assuming they didn't have other trades that affected net $10m) at a cost of only $1.3m for the acquiring team as Toronto could pay $10m. If a team had paid on other players they could potentially still get Powell fully paid.
If it comes down to a head to head of no cash exchanges vs. 25% of total contract limit I am reluctantly voting to eliminate cash exchanges as the alternative isn't reasonable. I think others will also vote the same way. I really really want to keep cash exchanges so this is extremely frustrating as I think net $10m can beat no cash exchanges, but $25m net, 25% contract limit, and keeping things the same don't have much of a chance. I think 25% contract limit is even worse than $25m net cash exchange limit as you can still go as high as you want in the current season and have everyone fully paid as long as they are on 4 year or more contracts. Plus then you have more stars and superstars than net $25m would allow and you can keep those players with the total team contract well above the net $25m limit for the next several years.
Everyone is entitled to their vote and to vote however they want. I certainly respect everyone's vote and know people vote differently for their own reasons, but I would consider what the final vote will be when making a vote in this qualifier round to narrow down the options in a future vote. Unwillingness to compromise now means you may get something further from what you want in the end.
«
Last Edit: April 30, 2022, 10:04:05 AM by DynastyDeacon
»
Logged
0
1
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
tdtdtd,
No reactions
Cross-Court Dynasty - New York Knicks
Interpaga
League Moderator
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1018
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
:blank:
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #21 on:
April 30, 2022, 12:02:24 PM »
We generally agree with the post above, with the difference that, between option 2 and option 5 (the two most voted options), we prefer option 5. We really do not like removing at all cash exchanges.
In particular, we agree that after the first vote equally split between no cash and $25m net limit, probably the best solution for the league is something in the middle. The problem is that, in our opinion, option 4 is too much close to having no cash exchange and not attractive for some teams if applied without a phase-out period (a net limit of $25m in 2023, decreasing to $15m from 2024 would be definitely better for us). A combination of option 5 with the addition of a limit for total net cash exchange would be the best solution for us but, considering that options cannot be changed, we confirm vote for option 5
«
Last Edit: April 30, 2022, 12:10:23 PM by Interpaga
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
ajm5551
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1049
Bonus inPoints: 50
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #22 on:
May 01, 2022, 08:20:12 PM »
Orlando Votes Option 5
Thanks for organizing this, and great discussion! All great ideas
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Cross-Court Dynasty: 2022-23 Eastern Conference Champions
Chicago Bulls Fan
Chicago Cubs Fan
Miami Dolphins Fan
RyanJames5
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9793
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #23 on:
May 02, 2022, 11:15:34 AM »
Seems option 5 is the best of these, since I don't want cash exchanges to go away
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 FGM Champions
2022 Armchair Champions
2021 Wild Card 2 Champions
2015 Wild Card Baseball World Series Champions
Braves155
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1298
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #24 on:
May 02, 2022, 01:20:27 PM »
I vote Option 5. However, I do think there should be a strict cash amt per transaction (Ie 10-12M/player) and an absolute MAX and MIN a team may give and/or receive any given year.
If we go by an ABSOLUTE MAX received/dealt in a season, I propose something along the lines of $50/$40. This way it will enable teams some flexibility in terms of competing/rebuilding, but keeping the competitive balance within the league. I do think much more either way could bring about potential issues, so we will need to discuss limitations if #5 is most popular/voted for.
«
Last Edit: May 03, 2022, 10:13:51 AM by Braves155
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Anthony
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10065
Bonus inPoints: 10000
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #25 on:
May 03, 2022, 01:06:59 PM »
3
Logged
0
1
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
DynastyDeacon,
No reactions
STLBlues91
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1108
Bonus inPoints: 0
Took over teams 2021-2022 season
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #26 on:
May 04, 2022, 06:00:36 PM »
5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Armchair NL champs 22 & 23
NFL Live-Miami Dolphins
jojowalkwalk
MVP
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4385
Bonus inPoints: 21
Co Founder NFL LIVE
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #27 on:
May 04, 2022, 06:28:45 PM »
Option 1
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Jonathan Sr.
NFL
LIVE
Milton
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 568
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
:NOR:
:blank:
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #28 on:
May 04, 2022, 09:01:32 PM »
5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
OUDAN
Legend
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 12256
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #29 on:
May 04, 2022, 09:23:16 PM »
Option 5 for
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"People don't know what it means to be champions, Oklahoma invented it."
-Barry "The King" Switzer
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
-Coach Taylor
I hated every moment of training but I said, "Don't quit, Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a Champion."
-Mohammed Ali
2014 FGM Champ
2015 Moneyball Champ
2015 Bush League Champ
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
BayAreaBallers
:
been focused on LIVE
May 09, 2024, 06:07:40 PM
STLBlues91
:
Ill be around the rest of the night for trade talks in any league
May 09, 2024, 07:19:35 PM
Brent
:
CCD is very active on the Discord Channel.
May 09, 2024, 07:55:50 PM
Braves155
:
Evening gents
May 09, 2024, 07:57:35 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
evening
May 09, 2024, 08:03:53 PM
Braves155
:
Will be on for a portion of the evening
May 09, 2024, 08:10:39 PM
Braves155
:
Been starting to get into these older games that originally ran off DOSBOX for those who know what I'm talking about. The idea is you build your team with a salary of XXX and then every 2-3 seasons you have decisions to make. Field a 26 man roster, control your own pitching rotation, pen, lineup & bench like the true MLB. Draft every season where there's a lot of turnover. Interesting for sure.
May 09, 2024, 08:15:28 PM
Braves155
:
PM Jwalk (Jets)
May 09, 2024, 08:30:58 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
idsjayhawk replied
May 09, 2024, 08:34:31 PM
Braves155
:
PM Professor Dan
May 09, 2024, 09:19:27 PM
Daddy
:
Let that Man go on vacation.
May 09, 2024, 09:27:13 PM
Daddy
:
He had earned this getaway. His computer has earned it.
May 09, 2024, 09:28:07 PM
Braves155
:
NEVER!!
May 09, 2024, 09:28:29 PM
Braves155
:
You mean 'getaway' from 100 prospect posts/week from our Brian?
May 09, 2024, 09:29:17 PM
Braves155
:
Any LIVE deal talks? Hmu
May 09, 2024, 09:38:00 PM
Daddy
:
He ain't the only one brotha
May 09, 2024, 09:40:48 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
dbreer deserves at least a hanfulof beers and margs
May 09, 2024, 09:45:42 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
we put him through the ringer w the activity
May 09, 2024, 09:45:54 PM
Rhino7
:
CCD has had a lot of trades lately
May 09, 2024, 09:54:49 PM
Daddy
:
That's awesome!
May 09, 2024, 10:06:13 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
I've returned to fgm
Yesterday
at 01:44:16 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
Took over the team available
Yesterday
at 01:44:26 AM
Daddy
:
Congratulations @BAB. FGM is well managed.
Yesterday
at 02:28:01 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
Yes I'm aware I had too much going on when I left after 2022 season. I'm back now for my second stint
Yesterday
at 02:50:11 AM
ldsjayhawk
:
Excited to have you
Yesterday
at 01:00:06 PM
indiansnation
:
Poor washington
Yesterday
at 03:04:48 PM
indiansnation
:
NFL Report: Commanders' rookie QB Jayden Daniels may soon be banned from the NFL Jayden Daniels, the 2nd overall pick in the 2024 Draft, has made a huge mistake that could get him banned from the NFL even before making his debut with the Washington Commanders. NFL News: Commanders' president unveils team's plans for name change NFL News: Magic Johnson makes his first big decision as co-owner of the Commanders Updated on May 10, 2024 10:51AM EDT Jayden Daniels was selected by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft ? Julio Aguilar/Getty ImagesJayden Daniels was selected by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft By Fernando Franco Puga The Washington Commanders have received some very bad news. Jayden Daniels, who they picked with the 2nd overall pick in the 2024 Draft, may soon be banned from the NFL after violating a very important rule. In the 2024 NFL Draft, several teams were in need of a top quarterback to bolster their offenses. With the 2nd overall pick, the Commanders decided to select Jayden Daniels, one of the best prospects at the position. Daniels had a remarkable path through LSU, even breaking some of Joe Burrow’s records. However, the quarterback’s career is now in jeopardy after he admitted to breaking the league’s rules regarding gambling. Jayden Daniels openly admits to violating the NFL’s gambling policy Worrying news has arrived in Washington today. Jayden Daniels, their 1st-round pick this year, has openly admitted to violating the NFL’s gambling policy, and his rookie season is in jeopardy. NFL Draft: Jayden Daniels admits whether he'd like to play for the Washington Commanders SEE ALSO NFL Draft: Jayden Daniels admits whether he'd like to play for the Washington Commanders During a recent appearance on the “All Facts, No Brakes” podcast, Daniels revealed that he has a bet with Malik Nabers, the New York Giants‘ 6th overall pick, on who’s going to be this year’s NFL Offensive rookie. “Man, he wasn’t supposed to tell nobody,” Daniels said about Nabers revealing the bet. “We got a little something going on. I mean, he put it out there, so it’s like I can’t say he cap.” Keyshawn Johnson, host of the podcast, asked Daniels about the bet. The quarterback admitted that the wager for $10,000 is real, but he was clearly uncomfortable with the question. Jayden Daniels Jayden Daniels with LSU “Going against him is gonna be fun,” Nabers said, via the New York Daily News. “We got a bet going for Rookie of the Year. Whoever loses gotta pay, I think it’s $10,000 cash.” Nabers and Daniels were teammates at LSU. They are set to meet in at least two games in the upcoming season. However, this gamble could get them both banned from the NFL, as they are clearly violating the league’s gambling policy. What does the NFL gambling policy says about betting? This situation will pose a huge challenge for the Commanders and the Giants. The league strictly prohibits players from engaging in any form of gambling related to the NFL, as it undermines the integrity of the game. SEE ALSO 2024 NFL Draft picks by team: How many picks does each team have? The policy explicitly prohibits ‘private wagers between teammates, family and friends, or others.’ This situation could land the two rookies in trouble, potentially resulting in a ban for the former LSU players. SURVEY Should Jayden Daniels and Malik Nabers be banned over their bet? Yes No ALREADY VOTED 1162 PEOPLE Fernando Franco Puga Fernando Franco is an accomplished writer and sports journalist specializing in soccer, NFL, MLB, and MMA. Since joining Bolavip US in 2022, he has significantly broadened his sports journalism repertoire, offering deep insights and coverage. Fernando's writing career began in 2013, and over the years, he has made notable contributions to leading sports media outlets, including Sopitas.com, Diario AS USA, and Goal. His articles are well-regarded for their depth and analytical approach. Fernando earned his degree in Communication from the prestigious Autonomous National University of Mexico (UNAM), equipping him with a robust foundation in media studies. JAYDEN DANIELS NEW YORK GIANTS NFL DRAFT WASHINGTON COMMANDERS Check our latest news in Google News FOLLOW US WHATSAPP ALSO READ SOCCER Report: Mexican star player is out of 2024 Copa America SOCCER MLS: Inter Miami coach explains if Angel Di Maria will play with Lionel Messi NFL Tom Brady reached out to Gisele Bundchen after his controversial roast NBA NBA News: Patrick Beverley gets big suspension EDITIONS:|ARGENTINA|BRASIL|CHILE|COLOMBIA|GLOBAL|M?XICO|US ENGLISH ABOUT US|STAFF|CONTACTO|Escribe en Bolavip|RedGol|Futbolcentroamerica Terms & ConditionsPrivacy policiesEditorial PolicyAd Choices A product from Futbol Sites. All rights reserved.
Yesterday
at 03:04:57 PM
Daddy
:
Brian. Please have the nearest person kick you in the nuts. Send me your medical bill. I will pay that.
Yesterday
at 04:26:11 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
I'll pitch in to cover. Smh
Yesterday
at 04:40:11 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Wtf brian
Yesterday
at 04:44:57 PM
Brent
:
Yeah, that was a wall of WTF.
Yesterday
at 05:16:07 PM
indiansnation
:
Iknow what im doing wilson didnt do crap for me. Was not going to resogn him
Yesterday
at 05:53:04 PM
indiansnation
:
Ill sign smith or love in free agency.
Yesterday
at 05:56:01 PM
indiansnation
:
Hell i can get both if i want
Yesterday
at 05:56:20 PM
indiansnation
:
I will have 141m in cap space.
Yesterday
at 05:58:10 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
I think thwy are talking about the chat post about jayden daniels brian. Not your trade
Yesterday
at 06:00:50 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
*they
Yesterday
at 06:00:57 PM
Daddy
:
The World is a better place with you in it Brian. For sure. You are one of a kind sir. You know how i feel about ya.
Yesterday
at 06:09:45 PM
Daddy
:
If your post takes up the entire chat box, do not press send. We good. Post the link instead.
Yesterday
at 06:11:08 PM
Daddy
:
You trading Russ after pooping on him for two years is no shocking development. You trading anyone other than the Wife shocks no one sir.
Yesterday
at 06:14:07 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
LOL!!
Yesterday
at 06:18:07 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Fricking hell JW that was savage
Yesterday
at 06:18:42 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
On mother days weekend too
Yesterday
at 06:18:54 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
FGM owners SD will look to make moves here very shortly as soon as I get time to get a better understanding of the team
Yesterday
at 06:19:59 PM
STLBlues91
:
im around the rest of the day for any talks
Yesterday
at 06:52:33 PM
Daddy
:
How does a Man go on vacation for a week yet manage to trade for Russ? Im not so sure someone didn't miss med call this morning.
Yesterday
at 07:09:56 PM
indiansnation
:
Jim w pm
Yesterday
at 10:21:14 PM
indiansnation
:
Jimw pm again
Yesterday
at 10:41:28 PM
indiansnation
:
Thanks for quick response brent
Yesterday
at 11:57:14 PM
Brent
:
Replied
Today
at 12:09:28 AM