Author Topic: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)  (Read 1009 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2013, 08:23:29 PM »
Since I am the subject of this debate I'd love to recuse myself from this discussion but I signed up for the RC so here's my two-cents:
It was decided a few short months ago that switching teams within FGM would no longer be permitted. There was an afterthought, however, that would allow such a maneuver if:
A.) A proven, competent GM was willing switch teams in order to rebuild or, B.) The club in question was a someones favorite team.
The Cubs are far from destitute. It would be a major step forward for Brent and, at best, a sideways step for Jeff. Not that either don't deserve it but those are the rules.
The favorite team aspect has very little credence with me. As far a I can tell the Cubs have few, if any, real life Cubs players on their roster. As with the all of the teams in FGM, it's the team in name only.
I believe Brent is a conscientious, knowledgeable owner and has the Angels headed in the right direction but as I interpret the rule I have to go with Option #1.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2013, 12:19:27 AM »
Rick, I will say this about the favorite team.  While it may just be a team name, the caps of teams make them very realistic.  Add in division rivalries and you have a feel that you are GMing the real club.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2013, 07:21:53 AM »
I think defining parameter might be tricky, but perhaps we require something like X number of nominations from the RC (4?).  Then if someone who is truly a longtime member with lots of contributions recognized by the league wants to move, they'll get support. 

If we could agree on something simple like that, I'd vote option #2.  If we need a complex system I'd think it would still lead to loopholes and issues I'd say forget it lets just go with #1.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2013, 02:17:46 PM »
The current vote is:

Option #1 - 3 Votes (:SF: Flash, :TEX: Rcankosy, :LAD: BHows)

Option #2 - 4 Votes (:PHI: Papps, :TB: Volsraysbucs, :PIT: Profsl, :KC: Kungfuwig)

Following RC Members have yet to vote

:BAL: Shooter47 (Myself)
:MIL: BrewersGM

If Option 1 passes internal transfers will not be allowed. If option 2 passes then the next step would be to have the RC vote on what special cases or situations will allow internal transfers (Betterment of the league, Favorite team, Etc.) If no option gets the 5 votes needed then internal options will not be allowed. If any special cases do pass then the RC will next need to vote on what will be the requirements that a GM must meet to be eligible for an internal Transfer.

The other problem that must be determined that goes along with this topic is how GM's will be decided on in the future. Does an internal candidate who qualifies for a transfer take precedent over outside candidates? If there are two or more managers who qualify for an internal transfer to an open team how do we settle who will be the manager to transfer?

It is my opinion that GM openings should be determined by the RC. I would prefer a simple voting system where the RC votes on candidates for the open position. I would favor a system where current GM's do not take precedence over outside candidates. I think all positions should be offered to the best candidate for the job. If there is only one candidate they would need to receive 5 yes votes from the RC to become the new GM. If there are two candidates then the RC would vote and the candidate with 5 or more votes would become the new GM. If there are 3 or more candidates then the RC would vote and the two candidates who receive the most votes would then go to another vote to determine the new GM. This system would be simple to implement but is a more subjective system that could lead to hurt feelings.

Im not sure how well a point system for internal transfers would work. Performance relative to expectations in this league would be a hard thing to judge. Basing this solely on finish related to cap ranking would not be a good thing in my opinion. GM's who take over a team like the Angels who have a high cap and perform poorly would be punished by a previous owner. This ranking would say they should be performing good because they have a high cap but they are a very poor team and it will take time to re-build them to a successful franchise.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Brewers GM

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2013, 01:45:26 PM »
It is my opinion that GM openings should be determined by the RC. I would prefer a simple voting system where the RC votes on candidates for the open position. I would favor a system where current GM's do not take precedence over outside candidates. I think all positions should be offered to the best candidate for the job.

I am in favor of this.  Perhaps we can expand to include the TC in addition to the RC so there is a larger pool of GM's voting and we have less room for favoritism (or perceived favoritism).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Brewers GM

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2013, 07:37:29 PM »
I am in favor of this.  Perhaps we can expand to include the TC in addition to the RC so there is a larger pool of GM's voting and we have less room for favoritism (or perceived favoritism).

To clarify, this is a vote for Option 2.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote - Internal Transfers (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2013, 07:43:46 PM »
The current vote is:

Option #1 - 3 Votes (:SF: Flash, :TEX: Rcankosy, :LAD: BHows)

Option #2 - 5 Votes (:PHI: Papps, :TB: Volsraysbucs, :PIT: Profsl, :KC: Kungfuwig, BrewersGM :MIL:)

Option #2 has been chosen. Internal transfers will be allowed in special cases. The RC will now vote on what those special cases are.

 :judge:



funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM