Author Topic: Scoring for Pitchers  (Read 4998 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #40 on: July 17, 2010, 02:34:24 AM »
But with all that being said, the fact of the matter is, it would be flat out wrong to change the system. if you do it, it shouldnt take effect for a couple years. teams have signed players and traded for players, that fit THIS scoring system. by changing it you would effectively be screwing those teams over.
:iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2475
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #41 on: July 17, 2010, 10:19:47 AM »
I would be in favor of gradually tweaking the scoring if others felt that it was more realistic.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2475
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #42 on: July 17, 2010, 11:35:19 AM »
Ignorance is bliss my friend...
http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/article/2010-04-01/uzr-fip-babip-stats-give-baseball-new-language
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/glossary/index.php?search=FIP

I could list countless websites that promote these facts, I encourage you to find one reputable source that disputes them...

Preferring James' formulas to yours is not ignorance my friend, it's intelligance!  :rofl:
« Last Edit: July 17, 2010, 11:47:15 AM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #43 on: July 17, 2010, 11:01:09 PM »
Using Bill James' Game Score formula(see below) for pitching, Tommy Hunter would have compiled 53 points last night, while Tim Wakefield would have only earned 16 points.  Please think about it guys.

Start with 50 points.
Add 1 point for each out recorded, so 3 points for every complete inning pitched.
Add 2 points for each inning completed after the 4th.
Add 1 point for each strikeout.
Subtract 2 points for each hit allowed.
Subtract 4 points for each earned run allowed.
Subtract 2 points for each unearned run allowed.
Subtract 1 point for each walk.

There are several inherent issues with the Game Score
  • It's designed for starting pitchers, and would not be directly re-applicable to our RP's
  • It counts hits and earned runs, which are not within a pitchers control
  • It does not include GB/FB, which a pitcher can control (will not capture as much actual skill as other metrics could)

This is in addition to being a major change, which is really a risky decision for scoring.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2010, 11:02:55 PM by Brewers GM »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #44 on: July 18, 2010, 11:47:56 AM »
I have been away from this posting for a while and it seems to have gone out of control. First off, Roy will be gone for the next week, so he cannot respond to any further posts until he returns. I have a few suggestions and the first one I hate, buut I am going to present it anyway.

1. Add quality starts as a category - I loathe this idea, but it gives points to a pitcher for going 6+ innings. I watched the Wakefield start and he got whooped. Despite what the stats may show, he wasn't unlucky he was just bad.  Tommy Hunter on the other hand, I feel is a fringe pitcher but he did pitch well enough despite two bombs. This could also go into luck because he was in trouble a lot of the game but got out of it. I personally feel he is due for a stat correction in the near future.

2. Somehow adding line drives. Ben I have done research on this after I had suggested it, since I didn't want to keep posting blindly. You are correct it is out of the pitchers control in a statistical manner of speaking. But if the guy isn't hitting his spots and he doesn't get hit hard, then it is the batters fault. As you said LD evens out, so if that is the case it should fluctuate from start to start. Maybe adding or subtracting from a guys weekly score.

But, and I am sure you guys have noticed it too, since I am sure you all watch a decent amount of baseball, is that some of these guys are getting hit hard on a regular basis. James Shields (going back to him again) has had his LD rate increase for the past several years, His BABIP however is a little out of line with his career norms. He also has a very good defense behind him. o my question is what does that make him? His career arc is that of a pitcher who is increasingly getting hit since his break out year of 2007. Maybe these are his new skills?

I do like the scoring the way it is, but I also feel it can be tweaked a little bit. To my knowledge there isn't a statistical measurement that is solely on the pitcher to measure if he is getting hit hard outside of home runs. Then again home runs could be a factor of weather - winds blowing in, out, park, time of year, humidity, etc. This isn't a perfect science, but I think we need something added to the pitchers scoring. I have given my suggestions, and welcome others. I agree with Roy in that aspect, but I don't think adding ERA or whip to the mix is the answer, since they are defense and bullpen dependent.   


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

daddypadre

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #45 on: July 18, 2010, 12:22:32 PM »
I would be in favor of gradually tweaking the scoring if others felt that it was more realistic.

I want to know what definition you give "realistic". Are we looking to isolate the value a pitcher brings to his ball club? (which could be done using the statistics we currently use and in my opinion a few other categories) Or are we looking to find the competition and the smarts needed in picking the right pitchers on the right teams who are going to put up better numbers than a less fortunate counterpart on a worse team?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: Responded indians
    May 19, 2024, 12:43:07 PM
  • dbreer23: Cubs are dealing in FGM, hit me up
    May 19, 2024, 12:59:38 PM
  • Braves155: Looking for an OF in FGM. IN Armchair looking to re-tool/rebuild a bit. Snell and others could be avail
    May 19, 2024, 01:09:11 PM
  • Braves155: PM Davew
    May 19, 2024, 01:23:10 PM
  • dbreer23: Brian CLE PM
    May 19, 2024, 01:49:57 PM
  • Braves155: PM BAB
    May 19, 2024, 03:29:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Bayareaballers pm trade posted in fgm
    May 19, 2024, 03:56:17 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves ill send u message soon
    May 19, 2024, 03:56:32 PM
  • indiansnation: Dbreer23 pm
    May 19, 2024, 03:58:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    May 19, 2024, 04:35:11 PM
  • indiansnation: Watching boston kick the living crap out of cardinals
    May 19, 2024, 04:53:49 PM
  • Braves155: Great seeing the Knicks get schooled
    May 19, 2024, 06:37:35 PM
  • Rhino7: I agree, pacers will be a better match vs Celtics
    May 19, 2024, 07:02:21 PM
  • Braves155: But just like anytime Stephen A. gets hyped for the Knicks, they disappear in big games
    May 19, 2024, 07:08:00 PM
  • TheGOAT: Celtics would probably win it all
    May 19, 2024, 07:20:01 PM
  • Braves155: Looking forward to TWolves-Nuggets tonight
    May 19, 2024, 07:22:40 PM
  • TheGOAT: Around for trade talks in NFL Live
    May 19, 2024, 08:07:18 PM
  • Braves155: Likewise
    May 19, 2024, 08:22:40 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: What you looking for? @Thegoat?
    May 19, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • Rhino7: Down goes the Champs! Nuggs out
    May 19, 2024, 11:56:44 PM
  • Daddy: That Minnesota NBA LIVE team aint lookin too bad right now. Should be fun!
    Yesterday at 12:00:46 AM
  • Rhino7: Good team except the contracts
    Yesterday at 03:09:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve seen them? We havent completely structured all that yet. Weve got expansion and other factors that the real Wolves dont face.
    Yesterday at 03:39:40 PM
  • Daddy: My comment on the real Wolves are if they win a chip then there is no such things as bad contracts. The point of all contracts are to win Championships.
    Yesterday at 03:40:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: I will be around the rest of the day to talk deals. Tomorrow I will be around after work but plan on being in some spreadsheets most the day
    Yesterday at 05:04:22 PM
  • Rhino7: No, haven’t seen them except on spotrac
    Yesterday at 05:33:13 PM
  • Daddy: @Rhino7 the rumor is they've got a decent GM in both leagues. Especially NBA LIVE. (Howwwwwwwl)
    Yesterday at 07:13:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Vegas is ready to grab one of the players on the roster
    Yesterday at 07:17:34 PM
  • Daddy: Lol, Seattle too Im sure.:rofl:
    Yesterday at 07:43:10 PM
  • Daddy: I will leak this... Each team will be allowed to protect 5 and each team can only lose one player to expansion
    Yesterday at 07:44:21 PM
  • Daddy: 30 teams to draw from = 15 players each
    Yesterday at 07:44:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: Id also imagine trading and all that can happen. Like pick a guy to trade to another team to pick up other assets
    Yesterday at 07:45:25 PM
  • Daddy: You know LIVE rules. Once they are yours you can do whatever you like.
    Yesterday at 07:46:32 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah had to just check. So a deadline to select the keepers. Then a few days for the selection. Me and Seattle alternate picks?
    Yesterday at 07:47:47 PM
  • Daddy: The expansion draft is LIVE alternating picks until both teams have 15 players like the NBA All Star teams get picked.
    Yesterday at 07:48:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: oh Crap
    Yesterday at 07:49:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is interesting w my team
    Yesterday at 07:49:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: who to protect outside the obvious
    Yesterday at 07:49:52 PM
  • STLBlues91: Sounds good I didnt know if it would be like the NHL expansion with seattle where they get posted or live broadcasting
    Yesterday at 07:50:02 PM
  • Daddy: The "Expansion draft" will be a LIVE Event & followed by the Entry Draft where Vegas/Seattle also will start off with picks #1 & #2.
    Yesterday at 07:50:06 PM
  • Daddy: We doing BIG Crap with this basketball league. Buckle up!
    Yesterday at 07:50:46 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE is codenamed "The "Matrix" for all the numbers we running. Its currently being built.
    Yesterday at 07:52:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well I will get my roster breakdown before the live expansion since I am done working for the summer next Wednesday
    Yesterday at 08:01:38 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE will drop first. Hockey guys trade like crazy. Good luck. :)
    Yesterday at 08:12:04 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah working on that spreadsheet and a few fixes on it. May do some slight visual adds and then to NCAA football sheet which I got going as well
    Yesterday at 08:48:21 PM
  • Daddy: :toth: the best moderator team on the planet. Thanks! :toth:
    Yesterday at 09:14:11 PM
  • Daddy: Can you imagine a league(s).  Where EVERY player that becomes a professional has value.. and 30-32 teams have 30-32 different people are actively determining that value?
    Today at 01:46:50 AM
  • Daddy: Where you dont wait for trades to happen on scoring sites or SS updates and the only thing asked of you is to run your own franchise and see how good you are. On an EVEN playing field.
    Today at 01:48:59 AM
  • Daddy: Its already near impossible to get into NFL LIVE. We had to start up a 64 team league just to accommodate the waiting list. True Story.
    Today at 01:55:29 AM
  • Daddy: Once full. NBA, NHL, & NCAAs will be very difficult to get into. People dont just walk away from LIVE often and when they do... They usually want back in. Legit dont miss your team in your sports. Get them while you can.
    Today at 02:00:44 AM