Author Topic: The Boston Celtics' Best Players Play Like Their Best Players, the Miami Heat's  (Read 762 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Founder
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile

When the Boston Bruins were in the midst of a losing streak during the 2011 NHL regular season NESN's Andy Brickley famously said "you need your best players to be your best players." He was talking about hockey, but the point he made resonates across all of sport. When the stakes get high teams need their best players to be at their best. That is the difference between the Boston Celtics and the Miami Heat in a nutshell – when the stakes get high the Boston's best players step up and Miami's best player, Lebron James, typically steps aside.

It's hard to pinpoint any game in these playoffs and say that Lebron actually played badly. He is averaging over 30 points per game in the Heat-Celtics series and has carried the Heat for multiple prolonged stretches, keeping them in games until the rest of their roster wakes up. However that is the problem with Lebron right there – he will be Miami's best player all night long and then suddenly vanish during crunch time. For the rest of the Heat roster this is like getting a rug pulled out from under them. It's like being carried for the first 25 miles of a marathon and then suddenly dropped within spitting distance of the finish line. The fact is, when the stakes get high, Lebron James doesn't want the ball, and the Miami Heat are not as good when he doesn't have the ball.

Lebron came to Miami because he wanted to pass more and shoot less. Basically he came to Miami so that Dwyane Wade could take the big shots for him, and this in itself was a piece of flawed logic. Lebron is Miami's best player and Miami is only at their best when he embraces that role. That is why they lose so many close games, because the longer a game stays close the less willing he is to be that guy. Lebron will be Miami's best player for 42 minutes, but if the game is still close with under six minutes left he suddenly doesn't want to do it anymore. It's hard to win races when your horse suddenly stops running if the race is still tight entering the last furlong.

The Heat are so absurdly talented that they win most of their games via blowout, and they do this with Lebron leading the way, Wade being the game's best sidekick, and Chris Bosh and the rest of Miami's role players chipping in where they can. However on the rare occasions where a game stays tight they suddenly aren't as good because, when crunch time rolls around and the other team doesn't quit, Lebron suddenly doesn't want to lead the way anymore. When the stakes get high he wants Wade to do it for him. This is just a bad game plan. Dwyane Wade is a great player, but if he has to be Miami's best player instead of Lebron, Miami is just not as good. It almost seems like, if Lebron hasn't put the game away after three and a half quarters, he turns to Wade and goes "go win this for me." This sometimes works because, while he isn't Lebron, Wade is still one of the best players in the NBA. But the Heat did not finish with the second best record in the Eastern Conference with Wade running the show. They are designed to have Lebron in the drivers seat, but every time the other car stays with them, he suddenly takes his hands of the wheel.

The Celtics are the exact opposite. They probably aren't as talented as Miami, but every single player on that roster knows his role. Paul Pierce was not Boston's best player in Game Five. He had shot an abysmal 5-18 before Rondo handed him the ball in isolation against Lebron. But in late game situations Pierce is Boston's best option. He is their best scorer, so when the game gets tight and Boston needs a bucket the ball is going to Paul Pierce. That is his role. He knows it and embraces it. Lebron is Miami's best scorer, but when the game is tight and Miami needs a bucket, he doesn't want to do it. He is the reigning league MVP. On talent alone he is one of the best to ever step on to a basketball court. He can score on literally anyone, but if the game is on the line he wont do it. It's hard to win that way. The Heat rely on Lebron to be their center piece, and it's tough to have success when your center piece vanishes when you need him most.

Every team that Lebron has ever played on has been criticized for not helping him out enough. Every role player that has suited up with Lebron, in Cleveland or Miami, has invariably not been good enough, and every time Lebron loses it's because he "doesn't have enough help." This could not be more unfair. How on Earth can anyone reasonably expect Udonis Haslem to hit that potential game winner in Game Four after he hadn't taken a shot all fourth quarter? How can Shane Battier be expected to knock down that three when he had only attempted three shots to the point. In order to be successful in team sports, teams' best players need to play their best, and when that doesn't happen it is very hard to win. Lebron repeatedly dominates for the majority of a game, but when it stays close he suddenly expects Mario Chalmers, Udonis Haslem, and Shane Battier to beat Paul Pierce, Rajon Rondo, Ray Allen, and Kevin Garnett. That is just a bad idea.

Anyone who looks at the Game Five box score will see 30 points and 13 rebounds and think Lebron played well. Don't look at the box score, it lies. He outplayed Paul Pierce all night long, but when the game was on the line he let a player who is older, slower, and shorter bury a three in his face. Miami built a thirteen point lead largely thanks to his efforts, but when the Celtics didn't fade away he did. His only points in the last eight minutes came on an uncontested layup and he spent most of crunch time standing in the corner watching Wade operate. As a result Miami was forced to rely on Wade and Mario Chalmers instead of Wade and James. Chalmers and Wade are good players, but James is their best. They are relying on him to be their best and are built on the idea that he will be. They need him to step up. Unfortunately for Miami, the King keeps stepping aside. He needs to figure out how stupid this is, and quickly, or the Heat are finished.

Be sure to check out other great articles at Sports Media 101.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM