Author Topic: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers  (Read 5215 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2013, 11:46:51 AM »
Im not in favor of a team getting extra cap space to please their prospective owner, many teams would want the same treatment.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2013, 11:53:47 AM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline MillerTime

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 7697
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2013, 12:00:13 PM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor.

I respect all of this statement and agree.  At the very least the standard for manager selection should be improved.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2013, 12:13:34 PM »
We should update the rules to limit a GM transfer to once every 5 years and a lifetime max of 3 different teams.  We should also have a formula for internal transfers that takes relative performance in account.

In reality, we have two applicants for this job being joeshmoe and nerwffej.  By my executive ruling, joeshmoe would have the job due to longer tenure with his franchise.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2013, 12:47:47 PM »
MT - here is the issue with the protocol, and it is something I have argued against since day one. It was a rule put in place that wasn't voted on by the RC. We all just took it as gospel.

As the rule states Chris should get the Dodgers on time spent here alone. Jeff recently moved to the Red Sox, so his time at that team gives him less tenure than Chris has with the Dodgers.

Here is my biggest problem - outside of the subjective - Chris was removed from the team in 2011, by me, for in activity. Technically that would give Jeff the lead for the Red Sox. So how hard are we going to follow the rules?

And I will state again, and you can quote me on it - this system for choosing new GMs sucks. Plain and simple. It has nothing to do with the talent of the GM and what they have done in the past. I could have hung around here for 3 years scratching my ass too, waiting for the Dodgers, Yanks, or the Brewers to open up, and then BONANZA!
And I refuse to censor myself on this issue because I believe in it so much. I'm sorry Chris, but your team has done nothing since you took over. That is not a personal attack, that's just facts. You can call me out, say I'm a d-ck, whatever, that's your opinion, I am a d-ck, ask my friends. But personally I don't think you deserve a promotion. And I changed my vote in your favor.

I don't need to call anyone a name or anything.  I am not doing that.  What I am saying is, what was the measure of improvement that I needed to show before getting a promotion?  Was it make 5 trades good or bad?  I have ascertained offers, and everytime I get counters that are a joke.  I mean honestly...why would I trade the pieces I do have to set back 4-5 years.  I never had superstars to trade away and recoup great talent, except AGON and the return would have worked had Gamel gotten healthy two years ago.  All signs were good. 

What I am saying is, show me where you think I haven't done anything...or not enough.  Show me....point to it.  Not just a stupid w/l column stat.  It's exactly why Colby said he wont be viable til 2015.  Because to do it right takes time.  Look at my drafts and tell me I screwed up the rebuild.  It's not the case it's the expectations...and those were never posted...except for in the instance of a tie.

As far as my time of absence...I admit it.  I was gone in 2011 due to a horrible breakup that coincided with the RFA schedule?  I messed up...but life was in the tubes for me.  I lost a few guys that I would have signed cheap, maybe, but that opportunity would have prevented me from other opportunities.  I am simply pointing out...what is the reason someone believes the Padres are no better than they were?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Eric

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #35 on: May 05, 2013, 12:50:39 PM »
Chris, can you just leave it? You have said the same thing over and over again. I think everybody gets your point. Just let it play out as it should. Its fantasy, no need to fire on all 8 cylinders over a team.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #36 on: May 05, 2013, 03:39:36 PM »
Chris, can you just leave it? You have said the same thing over and over again. I think everybody gets your point. Just let it play out as it should. Its fantasy, no need to fire on all 8 cylinders over a team.

It's not fire or anything else.  Others have said I did nothing with the Padres (Dan Wood, Corey) but they never provided a single reason why they felt that way.  Asking for a reason is perfectly acceptable. 

Furthermore, Corey is in a thread continuing to say these things and you chimed in "I agree 110%" so if you truly wish to calm the storm stop supporting someone from ranting baseless claims. 

It's quite insane to me that I got lambasted for asking the league to follow the rules set forth.  I slang no mud and made legitimate posts to base an opinion on.  I used evidence.  I'm asking that those who have taken a perch and are slinging arrows at me at least offer why they have the opinion they do.  That's not much.

And it's hard to have fun when Corey is using this to strike his personal vendetta against me.  I brought up a rule and this is the disrespect it cost me.  Horrendous.  I admit Corey and I don't get along, but I'm also not here saying he's a terrible manager and a bad person.  I am getting that from others though and if they're going to say it, they should be able to point to why.

Corey, I asked for the three instances you claim I was absent...you said you'd show me...do it!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Eric

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2013, 03:41:54 PM »
If you don't like how things are ran around here then just quit instead of keep rambling about the same things in every post.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #38 on: May 05, 2013, 03:55:55 PM »
If you don't like how things are ran around here then just quit instead of keep rambling about the same things in every post.

No, I don't have to quit because people were trying to end around the rules.  I also would have stopped posting about the same things had they been answered at all.  It's a discussion thread for the purposes of proposing questions and getting answers.

Lastly, where's this advice for Corey who is using this opportunity to insult my management without the base of the claim stated.  He has said much of the same things on many posts and in three threads now.  Instead of suggesting he quit you are suggesting he not quit.  It's a two edged sword you're using to villainize my concern about this issue that in fact affects me.

Where has the respect for a member of this league gone?  It's fantasy, it shouldn't be hard to have respectful disagreements. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: RC - Please Vote on the Future Owner of the Dodgers
« Reply #39 on: May 05, 2013, 05:44:30 PM »
First off, its not a personal vendetta. Its purely simple for the 5th time, since you cant comprehend. The Padres have not improved. Your cap continues to fall because you fail to put a team out there to even win 35 games. 35 games would keep your cap constant but you failed to do that.

You claim no talent? Where is agonz or better yet where is the return? Where is Chase Headley or the return...

The team has not got better. I dont care if it was Dan Wood who was running the Padres, I would say he should not the Dodgers because the team has done nothing.

Im sorry you take everything personal by thinking its a vendetta. That must happen to you a lot.

Record of inactivity for Joeshmoe


11/1/12 - 12/5/12
12/9/12 - 1/12/13
9/12/11 - 11/30/11

There is your inactivity.

You will be allowed the last word as I am done responding. Each time I respond I give the same answer and you are unable to process the information being given.

If you would like me to post the dates of your penalties and ban dates let me know.
I can also post the posts that got you banned and ruined a league as well.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2013, 06:14:47 PM by Corey »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • BayAreaBallers: done and done thx again
    Today at 09:06:10 PM
  • Rhino7: Got it, thanks
    Today at 09:07:37 PM
  • Rhino7: Minor league team too?
    Today at 09:08:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: can two teams have same college?
    Today at 09:17:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nevermind u have great edit skills
    Today at 09:18:27 PM
  • Braves155: I'll be interested to see who takes a few overlooked teams
    Today at 09:21:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i went homer
    Today at 09:23:10 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: wasnt gonna pass both up
    Today at 09:23:18 PM
  • Braves155: Clippers are listed 2x
    Today at 09:24:15 PM
  • Braves155: Brooklyn is missing
    Today at 09:26:33 PM
  • Daddy: Thanks guys, youre the best. But...im updating the sheet in real time, hand typed and adding information as I go.
    Today at 09:52:20 PM
  • Daddy: I appreciate all of your assistance. :rofl:
    Today at 09:52:43 PM
  • Daddy: Daddy: Im going to post it Today at 08:01:14 PM Daddy: But I will be editing it with team information on the fly Today at 08:01:32 PM
    Today at 09:53:51 PM
  • Daddy: Give me a few and I will link the final version, I havent looked at the replies yet.
    Today at 09:58:09 PM
  • Daddy: I was looking up G League team names which I never knew all 30 before today :rofl:
    Today at 09:58:55 PM
  • Daddy: There is actually more than 30. Expansion must be on the horizon.
    Today at 09:59:49 PM
  • Daddy: Isnt the NBA going back to Seattle?
    Today at 10:00:20 PM
  • IndianaBuc: That would be awesome
    Today at 10:02:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i dunno abt that
    Today at 10:15:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but an expansion is deff up there
    Today at 10:15:33 PM
  • Daddy: Seattle is getting the Sonics back I think
    Today at 10:16:02 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: [link]
    Today at 10:16:14 PM
  • Daddy: I think two more teams are coming 32 teams total
    Today at 10:16:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that link ^ talks abt expansion
    Today at 10:16:49 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah Vegas is getting one
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: not anytime soon
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: prolly in another 3 4 yrs
    Today at 10:17:16 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas is getting everything by the time its said and done.
    Today at 10:17:23 PM
  • Daddy: If there is demand we will expand ourselves. To hell with waiting for the NBA. We can put franchises in Vegas & Seattle and have a 32 team league.
    Today at 10:18:34 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas GM can pick his own team name
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its already getting an mlb team now
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • Daddy: So shall it be
    Today at 10:18:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: so thats 3/4 major sports
    Today at 10:19:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlb nhl and nfl
    Today at 10:19:04 PM
  • Daddy: Im opening up the Seattle Super Sonics! Lol...we bout to shake Crap up.
    Today at 10:19:51 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas Powerballs? We need to come up with something that makes the city of Vegas say hmmmm. I bet we can.
    Today at 10:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: The Las Vegas Ignite (i dig this)
    Today at 10:30:51 PM
  • Brent: The Las Vegas Gamblers
    Today at 10:49:05 PM
  • STLBlues91: If  someone wants chicago I dont mind taking over Las Vegas as well
    Today at 10:49:06 PM
  • Daddy: Its going to be fun having the two expansion teams. It will also balance out the league a bit more
    Today at 11:04:43 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent i dig it
    Today at 11:05:39 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Today at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Today at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Today at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Today at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Today at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Today at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Today at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Today at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Today at 11:43:59 PM