Author Topic: RFA and Rookie Contracts  (Read 669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
RFA and Rookie Contracts
« on: December 12, 2020, 03:24:41 PM »
Based on some inconsistencies brought with initial set up and to ensure we have a uniform rule for all players, I believe the below would be fair changes. Please feel free to weigh in and I have the poll as a simple yes or no. Ideally this can pass but if there is strong objection open to modifying and discussing further, just want things to be conistent. If this does passes changes will be made all together nd will update rules accordingly on games played, plus keep in mind this is mostly a 1 time cleanup.

Reviewing discussion thread and some talk with a few teams via PM in very simple terms we are looking at this:

Players with 0-29 NHL games played start with full rookie contracts
Players with 30+ NHL games played start with actual contract


So players who at this point in time have 0-29 NHL games played in their career would be on a full rookie contract and then once they cross 30 the contract changes to current season + the 2 years and then RFA status like league rules state. Any player right now who has more then 30 NHL games in prior years would start with whatever their actual contract currently is in the NHL.

Note: if you see * beside your player this means they require a call up or free drop. Also if this officially passes from the time it does, I will give 1 week deadline on these guys so you can also consider trades as a way to open spots/cap if needed.

Hopefully below covers everything and most teams not effected much with a few exceptions:


:ANA: Anaheim (Updated)
C Sam Carrick, $0.7m (R) (34GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021)*
C Isac Lundestrom, $0.7m (R) (30GP) -> $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] *
LW/RW Maxime Comtois, $0.7m (R) (39GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
D Brendan Guhle, $0.7m (R) (59GP) -> $0.8m (2021-2022)*


:BOS-NHL: Boston (Updated)
D Calle Rosen, $0.8m (2020-2021) (20GP) -> Not on ELC in real life so no adjustment
C/LW Morgan Frost, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (20GP) -> $0.9m (R)
RW Julien Gauthier, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (17GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Ville Heinola, $0.9m (2022-2023) [RFA] (8GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Timothy Liljegren, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (11GP) -> $0.9m (R)
G Jake Oettinger, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:CAR-NHL: Carolina
None

:COL-NHL: Colorado (updated)
C/LW Lias Andersson, $0.7m (R) (66GP) -> $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] * Already on NHL roster
RW Kiefer Sherwood, $0.7m (R) (60GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) (no RFA) *
D Anton Lindholm, $0.7m (R) (66GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) (no RFA) *


:EDM: Edmonton
None

:VGK: Las Vegas (Updated)
RW Matt Luff, $0.7m (R) (51GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
D Libor Hajek, $0.7m (R) (33GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
G Matiss Kivlenieks, $0.7m (2020-2021) [RFA] (6GP)-> $0.7m (R)


:LAK: Los Angeles (Updated)
D Nicolas Hague, $0.7m (R) (38GP) -> $0.8m (2021-2022) [RFA] * Already on NHL roster
C/LW Barrett Hayton, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (20GP) -> $0.9m (R)
G Ilya Samsonov, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (26GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:MIN-NHL: Minnesota (Updated)
LW Kirill Kaprizov, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:MON-NHL: Montreal
C/LW Joseph Blandisi, $0.7m (R) (101GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) (no RFA) * Already on NHL roster
D Alexander Romanov, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Cale Fleury, $0.7m (2022-2023) [RFA] (41GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA] * Change to RFA, already on NHL roster
D Gustav Olofsson, $0.7m (R) (59GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*


:NAS: Nashville (Updated)
RW Eeli Tolvanen, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (7GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:NYR: New York (Updated)
D Zach Whitecloud, $0.7m (2021-2022) [RFA] (17GP) -> $0.7m (R)
G Igor Shesterkin, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (12GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:PIT-NHL: Pittsburgh  (Updated)
D Juuso Valimaki, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (24GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:SJ: San Jose (Updated)
C/LW Lean Bergmann, $0.8m (2021-2022) [RFA] (12GP) -> $0.8m (R)
C/LW/RW Noah Gregor, $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA] (28GP) -> $0.8m (R)


:TBL: Tampa Bay
None

:TOR-NHL: Toronto (Updated)
D Rasmus Sandin, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (28GP) -> $0.9m (R)
C/LW Nicholas Robertson, $0.8m (2022-2023) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.8m (R)
RW Owen Tippett, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (7GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:VAN: Vancouver (Updated)
C Josh Norris, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (3GP) -> $0.9m (R)


These guys were labeled incorrectly as RFA during set up and will be updated to remove but posting so you can see before I do so (this is technically not for discussion, we are only allow true rookie/ELC contracts to hit RFA not real life RFA arbitration rights):

:BOS-NHL: - C/LW Pierre Engvall, $1.3m (2021-2022) [RFA]
:MIN-NHL: - C Joel Eriksson Ek, $1.5m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:NYR: - RW Pavel Buchnevich, $3.3m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:MON-NHL: - LW/RW Artturi Lehkonen, $2.4m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:VAN: - RW Brock Boeser, $5.9m (2021-2022) [RFA]
« Last Edit: December 15, 2020, 02:10:12 AM by Vik »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline indiansnation

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 20763
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CLE-NFL:
    • :CLE-NBA:
    • :CLS:
    • :OhioState:
    • :CLS-MLS:
    • :CLE:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2020, 03:52:25 PM »
I think this is a great idea and is what is best for this league.
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
Vik,
No reactions

Offline Shannonlwalker2

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 1397
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :MIA-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :ANA:
    • :Florida:
    • :LAD:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2020, 04:09:43 PM »
Nashville is largely unaffected by the proposed changes.
I am in favor of whatever makes this easier for the admins (running a number of leagues myself, easier is better IMO  lol) 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2020, 04:30:05 PM »
OK for Colorado
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline dmargolese21

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2020
  • Posts: 195
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2020, 04:41:21 PM »
Canucks approve
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2020, 04:56:07 PM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Ric_2227

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 1186
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2020, 04:57:02 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19210
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2020, 05:00:31 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.

Whether that's a good idea or not isn't really relevant for this change. Maybe bring this up separately for discussion if you feel strongly.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2020, 05:02:53 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.

Whether that's a good idea or not isn't really relevant for this change. Maybe bring this up separately for discussion if you feel strongly.

Agree, and for now any other number would have been too drastic of a change given initial set up.

Also appreciate quick and early feedback, looks like this should be good to go but keep it up a day or 2 before finalizing.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cloud91

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3641
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :ANA:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2020, 06:27:17 PM »
Ok for :ANA:  :thumbsup:

 :toth:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:ANA: Title Town: NHL   :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2017-'18 Season
:PIT-NHL: King Of The Rink (NHL Yahoo GM) :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2014-'15 Season

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Today at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Today at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Today at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Today at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Today at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Today at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Today at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Today at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Today at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Today at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Today at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Today at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Today at 06:21:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I could teach how I did what I did
    Today at 07:33:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: ill be around for a few hours today. Wont be around tomorrow until late
    Today at 07:37:07 PM
  • TheGOAT: Thank God that there are 3 really good qb options in the draft. Can't imagine a world with Bo Nix as my frachise qb
    Today at 08:12:51 PM
  • TheGOAT: Not that hes bad
    Today at 08:13:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: think rn my qb room is minshew dobbs wentz
    Today at 08:22:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: We look forward to your return to the playoffs @Thegoat
    Today at 08:22:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You and your brother camw in guns blazing a few years back. The NFC is not the gauntlet the AFC is. Once you make the title game, all bets are off
    Today at 08:23:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nfc is still tough
    Today at 08:25:23 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i had a tough road
    Today at 08:25:37 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: to get to teh ship lot of good teams i knocked out
    Today at 08:25:50 PM