Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Franchise GM
Wall of FGM Champions
|
Fantrax Page
|
Rulebook
|
Contracts
|
Extension Calculator
|
Transactions
|
Draft Room
|
Draft Order
|
|
|
|
PAPPS
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Down
Author
Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses (Read 3241 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #10 on:
September 05, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
Changing my vote to #5.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #11 on:
September 05, 2012, 06:51:05 PM »
I could go with 5...so that's 3 for 5...out of 7 members....who has yet to vote?
Then we get then treat of discussing numbers
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2466
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #12 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:39:32 AM »
I believe that eliminating the bonuses would achieve the same objectives as # 5 without the burden of establishing draft budgets by team and tracking rookie bonuses. It seems as if the main objective is to get the top talent into the hands of the neediest teams without compromising their ability to compete in the regular season. I see no advantage to option # 5, because a reasonable draft budget would allow teams to afford the rookies they want regardless of bonus level. Some top prospects fell to the better teams this year, because some teams could not afford the rookie bonuses. Please let me know if I am missing something, because simpler is generally better, unless there is an advantage to draft budgets that I am missing.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:48:12 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
VolsRaysBucs
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3677
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #13 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:44:58 AM »
I'm good with #5 as well.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2466
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #14 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:51:24 AM »
To be clear, I would like someone to explain the practical advantages of # 5 over # 2. # 5 sounds good in theory, but the same objectives could be achieved by # 2 without the extra work of establishing draft budgets and tracking bonuses. A draft scenario comparing one option to the other would be ideal, because I don't see a difference between the two options and # 5 involves a lot more work.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:55:11 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #15 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:55:37 AM »
I tend to agree Roy, but there seems to be a concesus of maintaing the bonuses. Giving teams a budget limit adds to the strategy of the draft. Again, I am fairly open to any of the suggestions on the board, but those are the positives that I can see coming from option 5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #16 on:
September 06, 2012, 12:00:55 PM »
#2 would eliminate any strategy besides picking the best player. With #5, teams would still need to take money into consideration which is more realistic. My vision of the draft budget would be a supplement. Teams are still welcome to spend regular cap space on the draft.
I think what #5 is doing essentially it to shrink the gap in cap space between big market and small team. A cleaner solution might be to bump up the cap space of smaller market teams so we dont have to keep track of 2 caps.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2466
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #17 on:
September 06, 2012, 03:02:51 PM »
I realize that we are trying to emulate real life, and a draft budget appears to add strategy, but I do not believe that it will. Let's take the Orioles as an example. We would need to give them a large enough budget to accommodate the best and 31st player available in the draft. Apply that same logic on down the line to the the other teams. The second you separate the draft budget from the regular one, all the teams would have funds readily available for the players that would probably fall to them in the draft. Where is the strategy assuming everyone drafts the best player available and they have the cap budget to do so? Again, it seems like a lot of work for nothing unless someone can provide a workable example of how the supposed strategy behind a draft budget would come into play.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #18 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:15:38 PM »
My thinking on it is as such...
Giving a team a draft budget (cap) that is all they would be allowed to spend in the draft, unless they wanted to spend some of their money and sign the player to a MLB contract, add that player to their 40 man, and not receive any benefits of having said player as a prospect (see Mike Trout as an example).
In my head #6 works better because that way the cap amount is fluid from season to season. ANd would emulate the way the Rays were built. High picks until they got good, then the gravy train runs out. The numbers I had more or less imagined were 10 mil for the lower end teams and 3 mil for the higher end (rich or playoff teams depending if we are talking 5 or 6) and 5 mil for the guys in between. Again the numbers can be finagled.
I tend to agree with Howe that #2 doesn't involve any strategy because of all of the auto picking that goes on here.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
mattpily
All-Star
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1060
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #19 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:18:12 PM »
I like option 5 and 6 but if I had to pick just 1 I would go with 6
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
Mt_Crushmore
:
I'll pitch in to cover. Smh
May 10, 2024, 04:40:11 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Wtf brian
May 10, 2024, 04:44:57 PM
Brent
:
Yeah, that was a wall of WTF.
May 10, 2024, 05:16:07 PM
indiansnation
:
Iknow what im doing wilson didnt do crap for me. Was not going to resogn him
May 10, 2024, 05:53:04 PM
indiansnation
:
Ill sign smith or love in free agency.
May 10, 2024, 05:56:01 PM
indiansnation
:
Hell i can get both if i want
May 10, 2024, 05:56:20 PM
indiansnation
:
I will have 141m in cap space.
May 10, 2024, 05:58:10 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
I think thwy are talking about the chat post about jayden daniels brian. Not your trade
May 10, 2024, 06:00:50 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
*they
May 10, 2024, 06:00:57 PM
Daddy
:
The World is a better place with you in it Brian. For sure. You are one of a kind sir. You know how i feel about ya.
May 10, 2024, 06:09:45 PM
Daddy
:
If your post takes up the entire chat box, do not press send. We good. Post the link instead.
May 10, 2024, 06:11:08 PM
Daddy
:
You trading Russ after pooping on him for two years is no shocking development. You trading anyone other than the Wife shocks no one sir.
May 10, 2024, 06:14:07 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
LOL!!
May 10, 2024, 06:18:07 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Fricking hell JW that was savage
May 10, 2024, 06:18:42 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
On mother days weekend too
May 10, 2024, 06:18:54 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
FGM owners SD will look to make moves here very shortly as soon as I get time to get a better understanding of the team
May 10, 2024, 06:19:59 PM
STLBlues91
:
im around the rest of the day for any talks
May 10, 2024, 06:52:33 PM
Daddy
:
How does a Man go on vacation for a week yet manage to trade for Russ? Im not so sure someone didn't miss med call this morning.
May 10, 2024, 07:09:56 PM
indiansnation
:
Jim w pm
May 10, 2024, 10:21:14 PM
indiansnation
:
Jimw pm again
May 10, 2024, 10:41:28 PM
indiansnation
:
Thanks for quick response brent
May 10, 2024, 11:57:14 PM
Brent
:
Replied
Yesterday
at 12:09:28 AM
Daddy
:
NBA LIVE "Pre Reserve" sign up sheets will appear next week. Be ready to select a college along with your NBA franchise as will be explained.
Yesterday
at 12:54:27 PM
Daddy
:
NBA LIVE & NCAA Basketball LIVE will complete the LIVE experience on profsl. Our leagues have been copied & cloned on other sites. I can show you links.
Yesterday
at 12:56:07 PM
Daddy
:
Often imitated we may be. Duplicated we are not. There are no other leagues that are like us. Dont believe? See for yourself.
Yesterday
at 12:58:04 PM
STLBlues91
:
Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talk
Yesterday
at 03:19:45 PM
Daddy
:
NBA LIVE = 15 man roster >> 15 man G League affiliate (plus finance) >> NCAA Basketball LIVE (College Team) affiliate + recruiting. It will be the most realistic simulation in the dynasty basketball arena.
Yesterday
at 04:32:21 PM
Rhino7
:
I’m in for sure
Yesterday
at 04:38:40 PM
Braves155
:
PM Rhino
Yesterday
at 06:14:38 PM
Braves155
:
Will be around for talks rest of day
Yesterday
at 06:18:46 PM
TheGOAT
:
Anyone who needs secondary in nfl live could talk to me
Yesterday
at 07:43:57 PM
TheGOAT
:
PM STLBlues
Yesterday
at 09:16:47 PM
Daddy
:
Dont you just love it. When a deal comes together with another competitor. That exchanging of assets. Its how civilization was created.
Yesterday
at 10:12:48 PM
Daddy
:
Deal. (Nothing like it)
Yesterday
at 10:13:20 PM
Braves155
:
Anymore deals to be had in NFL LIVE? Looking for picks/young players
Yesterday
at 10:30:35 PM
indiansnation
:
If anybody looking to trade im up for it
Today
at 12:33:55 PM
indiansnation
:
Cubs and guardians make trade in mlb live
Today
at 01:41:33 PM
Braves155
:
I'm also looking to deal
Today
at 02:22:11 PM
Daddy
:
Tomorrow the NBA LIVE "Pre-Reserve" sign up sheet will be posted at 8PM EST. More league details to follow.
Today
at 02:30:02 PM
Daddy
:
Start up virgin franchises and an even playing field from the start. As with all LIVE leagues, no advantages, no disadvantages, only pure competition. The truest proving ground.
Today
at 02:31:26 PM
Daddy
:
Dynasty Basketball will never be the same. Its already changing.
Today
at 02:33:05 PM
Braves155
:
Meanwhile in NFL LIVE...eagerly awaiting start of the NFL LIVE Draft
Today
at 02:34:36 PM
Daddy
:
8/1/24 8PM EST NFL LIVE Draft. The ultimate LIVE Draft!
Today
at 02:36:28 PM
Daddy
:
NFL LIVE Owners, here is your draft preview
[link]
Today
at 02:38:00 PM
Braves155
:
Would be interesting to see some Mock NFL LIVE Drafts, especially after the first 10 or so picks
Today
at 03:39:54 PM
Daddy
:
We only do one and we only do the first round. It isnt released until July.
Today
at 03:54:55 PM
TheGOAT
:
pm STLBlues
Today
at 04:51:27 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
RyanJames5 pm sent.
Today
at 06:22:37 PM
TheGOAT
:
Back again STL
Today
at 06:49:37 PM
TheGOAT
:
Back again STLBlues
Today
at 06:52:56 PM