Author Topic: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)  (Read 1597 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:29:44 PM »
Since I am posting on changes for 2015 I thought I would post my proposal for changes to the EDR.

The current size of the EDR in FGM is 20 players. The only way for a player to be placed on the EDR is for that team to draft that player in the annual FGM draft.

My proposed changes to the EDR are:

1. Increase the size of the EDR to 30 players.

This change is proposed because larger EDR's will help rebuilding teams. My goal for this would be that teams that are rebuilding would be able to have more prospects in their EDR's which would allow them roster more MLB players on their 40 man rosters.

2. Allow International Free Agents under the age of 18 (Age when signed by FGM team) to be placed on a teams EDR.

Currently in FGM international players aren't typically signed for a while because they have to be rostered on a teams 40 man roster. This rule would increase the value of International FA players and help rebuilding teams sign them without wasting a roster spot on their 40 man roster. I would limit the age to 18 so that teams must sign players when they are younger so that the purpose of the EDR doesn't change (Provide incentive to teams that use the "farm" to build for long term).

3. Allow players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded.

I brought up this rule for discussion because I have had people ask me about this. I'm not sure if I am in favor of this or not but It would help teams that are trying to rebuild use the EDR more effectively and not waste roster spots on their 40 man rosters.

RC members please discuss these potential changes. Feel free to list which ones you are for/against or feel free to suggest any other changes you think might be wise to make.

Shooter
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2014, 04:51:31 PM »
As far as increasing the EDR size to 30, I would be in favor of it.  With 10 rounds of drafts each year and it usually takes 3-5 years I think that an increase in size would be beneficial to the league.  I would vote for an EDR increase.

I also would vote to allow international free agents to be placed on a teams EDR.  Especially ones under the age of 18 years old.  I shy away from signing those young players as they will sit on my 40 man roster for a while.

I would also vote to allow players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded.  I think this is a no brainer. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2014, 06:29:41 PM »
Yes, yes, no
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2014, 07:16:54 PM »
After reading, and considering the merits of BHows' post below, I am modifying my previous post to keep things as they are in regards to the size of our EDR rosters. I vote to keep the EDR rosters at 20.

With the increase of the EDR roster to 30, I would also be in favor of allowing international free agents to be on our EDR rosters.  With our present set-up, it's tough to have a young player, who is years away from contributing to your team, on your 40 man roster. I support allowing International Free Agents under the age of 18 (Age when signed by FGM team) to be placed on a teams EDR.

Allowing players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded is something I've supported since coming into the league.  Look at how many teams, who are not competitive, have their 40 man rosters filled with players who should be EDRs.  Like papps, I also think this is a no brainer. I support allowing players on one team's EDR to be placed on another team's EDR when traded.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 12:15:10 PM by Flash »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline VolsRaysBucs

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3677
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :ORL:
    • :TBL:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2014, 10:19:31 AM »
In my opinion, all three of these proposals are no-brainers...I vote a big fat YES to all 3!  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2014, 10:37:46 AM »

I'm not sure that we need to increase the EDR size. My concern is the unexpected side-effects to the FA pool. One of the things that keeps people interested during the season is the possibility of finding  "lightening in a bottle".
Every year we have a 10 round FYPD and statistics show that we all have players currently on our EDR that will, more than likely, never see a MLB pitch.
From Bleacher Report:
"only 66 percent of first-round picks play in the major leagues."
"For those players drafted in the second round of the draft, the chances of reaching the major leagues drops to 49 percent."
"Rounds 3-5 are a major turning point where the odds begin to drastically decrease, as only 32 percent of players drafted reach the majors."
"And the likelihood of playing in the major leagues continues to worsen, as only 20 percent of players drafted in Rounds 6-10 reach The Show."

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1219356-examining-the-percentage-of-mlb-draft-picks-that-reach-the-major-leagues

I would rather keep the EDR at 20 and if you decide to sign a player without having an available EDR spot, drop a player.

I have long been a proponent of allowing traded EDR player be allowed to be placed on the EDR of the acquiring team's EDR and I don't have any issues with Point #2
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2014, 12:08:04 PM »
I'm not sure that we need to increase the EDR size. My concern is the unexpected side-effects to the FA pool. One of the things that keeps people interested during the season is the possibility of finding  "lightening in a bottle".
Every year we have a 10 round FYPD and statistics show that we all have players currently on our EDR that will, more than likely, never see a MLB pitch.
From Bleacher Report:
"only 66 percent of first-round picks play in the major leagues."
"For those players drafted in the second round of the draft, the chances of reaching the major leagues drops to 49 percent."
"Rounds 3-5 are a major turning point where the odds begin to drastically decrease, as only 32 percent of players drafted reach the majors."
"And the likelihood of playing in the major leagues continues to worsen, as only 20 percent of players drafted in Rounds 6-10 reach The Show."

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1219356-examining-the-percentage-of-mlb-draft-picks-that-reach-the-major-leagues

I would rather keep the EDR at 20 and if you decide to sign a player without having an available EDR spot, drop a player.

I have long been a proponent of allowing traded EDR player be allowed to be placed on the EDR of the acquiring team's EDR and I don't have any issues with Point #2

BHows' points about keeping the EDRs at 20 are very noteworthy.  I never really considered that we would be taking 300 players out of the free agent pool if we increase the EDR roster to 30.  Since we are discussing the matter, and after thinking it over, I agree with BHows and support keeping the EDR rosters at 20. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2014, 12:14:41 PM »
If it does come down to keeping the EDR at 20 then why don't we look at reducing the amount of rounds in the draft from 10 to maybe 7?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2014, 05:38:01 PM »
The intention of increasing the EDR would be to allow teams to build through the draft more effectively. Players take 3-5 years to develop in the minor leagues so more roster spots gives teams longer looks at players.

The additional roster spots will also allow more teams to roster marginal MLB players and should increase parity across the league. Currently rebuildling teams tend to sign a prospect over a part time MLB player because there is more longterm value to their team if the prospect pans out. I would much rather see the Phillies (Not picking on your team just using it as an example papps) be able to sign more MLB players and not have an entire roster of prospects when rebuilding.

I also don't see this killing the FA market that much. Yes additional players will be owned in the EDR but the only way to get on the EDR is being taken in the Draft or as a very young International player. There will still be tons of in season "surprise" players that will be available on the FA Market. The in season signings are usually players that were lower drafted players who are a little old for prospects and over achieve there projected outcome for a year or two. These players are not likely to be on an EDR in FGM.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Brent

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 15346
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NO:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LouisianaState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2014, 07:51:51 PM »
I'm not on the RC so I can't vote, but this concerns the league and GMs should be heard.

We don't really have a 20 player minors roster since the EDR is very strict and built through the entry draft only.  BHOWs posted the %'s of who actually makes it and I think that proves the complete opposite point of his.  The current state of most teams EDRs is a joke as most players are never going to make it to the show.  If the EDR is expanded with even some slight changes to the rules of who is allowed on the EDR or change it to a real Minors roster then, IMO, the league will be better off.  I do know that there are some original FGM GMs in the league and they want it to be different from the other leagues and that is cool as well, but the current state of this league doesn't really allow for teams to rebuild and become relevant in a short time.  Traded EDRs should be able to go on the new teams EDR the fact that currently isn't allowed is baffling. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SEA: 2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
:NOP: 2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
:NO: 2021-2022 NFL Live -  30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
:NO: 2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM
  • Daddy: I grew up watching The Rainman & The Glove. Welcome back to the NBA Seattle Supersonics. Ive missed ya.
    Today at 12:37:30 PM
  • OUDAN: Frick em, They are much better off in OKC
    Today at 12:54:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats cold :rofl:
    Today at 01:03:25 PM
  • Daddy: I should have known you jumped off the Lakers and on to the home state squad. We havent talked basketball much here like the old days.
    Today at 01:08:21 PM
  • Daddy: When Philly drafted Embiid that year we had LOR (Lord of the Rings) and we talked much hoops.
    Today at 01:10:18 PM
  • OUDAN: I refused before because of KD but this squad you cant help but love the way they play
    Today at 01:17:16 PM
  • OUDAN: Also I swear I enjoy fantasy basketball more than any other.
    Today at 01:20:09 PM
  • Daddy: Well you are Oklahoma Dan. Makes sense for you to love OKC & OU. Fricking Boomer Sooner!!!
    Today at 01:35:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Truth
    Today at 02:00:20 PM
  • Daddy: You are also top 5 in my All Time Greatest Fantasy GM ranking. We go back 14 years. If there is a Mount Rushmore for dynasty GMs. You Qualify.
    Today at 02:05:44 PM
  • Daddy: Thats also Truth. Ive seen them all.
    Today at 02:06:08 PM
  • OUDAN: Appreciate that man, Crazy how long some of us have been around here.
    Today at 02:15:49 PM
  • OUDAN: Crazy how long some of us have been on here
    Today at 02:15:58 PM
  • Daddy: I was hooked right away. Day 1 Scouting Department Baseball Milwaukee Brewers. Its like i was bit by a Vampire.
    Today at 02:26:34 PM
  • OUDAN: I miss when I cared enough about baseball to put the time in lol
    Today at 02:29:23 PM
  • Daddy: Fourteen years of learning. Ive seen leagues and sites fail and shutdown. Ive watched all the sites. All the leagues. People love to play for a buck.
    Today at 02:33:42 PM
  • OUDAN: I for sure prefer money leagues but yeah a lot have failed
    Today at 02:36:12 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody offered what i wanted. Just parts of it. Nobody did it completely right. They copied flawed concepts and theyve failed. 95% of all dynasty leagues fail.
    Today at 02:36:15 PM
  • Rhino7: OUDAN if you want OKC let me know, I’ll take a diff team. I’d like to compete against you more
    Today at 03:12:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Im in if thats an option
    Today at 04:00:45 PM
  • Rhino7: I’ll take Orlando if it’s not an issue
    Today at 04:08:55 PM
  • OUDAN: That would have been my 2nd choice
    Today at 04:15:52 PM
  • OUDAN: Thanks man for that swap
    Today at 04:16:52 PM
  • Daddy: I will make it so
    Today at 05:00:42 PM
  • OUDAN: Daddy why is OU listed in the big 12?
    Today at 05:18:25 PM
  • OUDAN: Move them where they belong in the SEC
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: So is OUDAN strictly basketball now?
    Today at 05:18:43 PM