0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well, that was fast. Are we not considering the dodgers owner as a new owner in regards to the new owner trading restrictions?I understand Carl used to be the owner of the Dodgers at one point but trading away a top prospect to probably the first/only team you’ve talked to within hours of taking over the team is the exact reason you put these rules in place Chris. If the return for Buehler was lights out I’d be more inclined to overlook the breach of rules but it’s not. I think it’s quite light actually. Which is why the rule was put in place....to protect new owners from predatory existing owners.I’d recommend following the rules and Carl, you can put up a trade block along with dangling Buehler out there to see what other teams will pay. If you still feel this trade is best for your team after shopping him around I’d be happy to give it my approving vote but for now... :veto:
Only top 100 I see is Walker, and he places in top 10. I'd like to hear more from LA GM.
:iatp: but Astros easily wins this trade for me. Guzman has potential, but looks overhyped with more walks than K's. GL. I would of kept Walker and left him in minors, his value would of only increased with time. I guess that is what happens when you move a player without even putting him on block GL with the rebuild though, looks like a longer road now.