Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Franchise GM
Wall of FGM Champions
|
Fantrax Page
|
Rulebook
|
Contracts
|
Extension Calculator
|
Transactions
|
Draft Room
|
Draft Order
|
|
|
|
PAPPS
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Down
Author
Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses (Read 3476 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #10 on:
September 05, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
Changing my vote to #5.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #11 on:
September 05, 2012, 06:51:05 PM »
I could go with 5...so that's 3 for 5...out of 7 members....who has yet to vote?
Then we get then treat of discussing numbers
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2494
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #12 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:39:32 AM »
I believe that eliminating the bonuses would achieve the same objectives as # 5 without the burden of establishing draft budgets by team and tracking rookie bonuses. It seems as if the main objective is to get the top talent into the hands of the neediest teams without compromising their ability to compete in the regular season. I see no advantage to option # 5, because a reasonable draft budget would allow teams to afford the rookies they want regardless of bonus level. Some top prospects fell to the better teams this year, because some teams could not afford the rookie bonuses. Please let me know if I am missing something, because simpler is generally better, unless there is an advantage to draft budgets that I am missing.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:48:12 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
VolsRaysBucs
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3677
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #13 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:44:58 AM »
I'm good with #5 as well.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2494
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #14 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:51:24 AM »
To be clear, I would like someone to explain the practical advantages of # 5 over # 2. # 5 sounds good in theory, but the same objectives could be achieved by # 2 without the extra work of establishing draft budgets and tracking bonuses. A draft scenario comparing one option to the other would be ideal, because I don't see a difference between the two options and # 5 involves a lot more work.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:55:11 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #15 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:55:37 AM »
I tend to agree Roy, but there seems to be a concesus of maintaing the bonuses. Giving teams a budget limit adds to the strategy of the draft. Again, I am fairly open to any of the suggestions on the board, but those are the positives that I can see coming from option 5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #16 on:
September 06, 2012, 12:00:55 PM »
#2 would eliminate any strategy besides picking the best player. With #5, teams would still need to take money into consideration which is more realistic. My vision of the draft budget would be a supplement. Teams are still welcome to spend regular cap space on the draft.
I think what #5 is doing essentially it to shrink the gap in cap space between big market and small team. A cleaner solution might be to bump up the cap space of smaller market teams so we dont have to keep track of 2 caps.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2494
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #17 on:
September 06, 2012, 03:02:51 PM »
I realize that we are trying to emulate real life, and a draft budget appears to add strategy, but I do not believe that it will. Let's take the Orioles as an example. We would need to give them a large enough budget to accommodate the best and 31st player available in the draft. Apply that same logic on down the line to the the other teams. The second you separate the draft budget from the regular one, all the teams would have funds readily available for the players that would probably fall to them in the draft. Where is the strategy assuming everyone drafts the best player available and they have the cap budget to do so? Again, it seems like a lot of work for nothing unless someone can provide a workable example of how the supposed strategy behind a draft budget would come into play.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #18 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:15:38 PM »
My thinking on it is as such...
Giving a team a draft budget (cap) that is all they would be allowed to spend in the draft, unless they wanted to spend some of their money and sign the player to a MLB contract, add that player to their 40 man, and not receive any benefits of having said player as a prospect (see Mike Trout as an example).
In my head #6 works better because that way the cap amount is fluid from season to season. ANd would emulate the way the Rays were built. High picks until they got good, then the gravy train runs out. The numbers I had more or less imagined were 10 mil for the lower end teams and 3 mil for the higher end (rich or playoff teams depending if we are talking 5 or 6) and 5 mil for the guys in between. Again the numbers can be finagled.
I tend to agree with Howe that #2 doesn't involve any strategy because of all of the auto picking that goes on here.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
mattpily
All-Star
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1060
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #19 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:18:12 PM »
I like option 5 and 6 but if I had to pick just 1 I would go with 6
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
Daddy
:
In what league?
June 06, 2024, 11:14:24 PM
Daddy
:
@Brent you are a vet. Your skills will carry over.
June 06, 2024, 11:14:54 PM
Daddy
:
Stats, age, contract, google.
June 06, 2024, 11:15:12 PM
Daddy
:
You will be a playoff team just because you're one of the best "Dynasty Fantasy" GMs mother Earth has birthed.
June 06, 2024, 11:16:11 PM
Daddy
:
I personally would welcome the challenge of learning an entirely new sport within the confounds of dynasty fantasy arena. Its fun and if you dont win at first so what.
June 06, 2024, 11:17:50 PM
Brent
:
Yeah, that's why I took on the challenge. I'll learn and figure out how I want to build this Predators team.
June 06, 2024, 11:19:20 PM
Daddy
:
I like the Preds
June 06, 2024, 11:19:43 PM
Daddy
:
You will love NHL LIVE i guarantee it. Wait till those bullets start getting fired.
June 06, 2024, 11:20:30 PM
jmntl82
:
Kings are in the same boat, NHL is a new landscape for me to traverse
June 06, 2024, 11:46:36 PM
indiansnation
:
Jmntl82 p!
June 06, 2024, 11:48:57 PM
indiansnation
:
pm
June 06, 2024, 11:49:03 PM
indiansnation
:
Hey guys rumor flying that their might be a new hockey league coming out.Major League Hockey (MLH) is determined to be the next big thing in the sport. Looking to launch in the fall of 2024, MLH is looking for early star power to give their league some buzz and legitimacy.
Yesterday
at 12:17:21 AM
Daddy
:
Yesterday
at 12:34:39 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
mlh is a 3 v3 version of nhl
Yesterday
at 12:35:42 AM
Daddy
:
Yesterday
at 12:36:49 AM
Daddy
:
They will go bankrupt after the first year
Yesterday
at 12:38:58 AM
Daddy
:
I bet this was Sidney Crosby's idea.
Yesterday
at 12:42:22 AM
Daddy
:
Fantrax offers the following options that support LIVE format Dynasty Sports.... Soccer, NASCAR, PGA, & believe it or not Formula One.
Yesterday
at 03:24:02 AM
Daddy
:
We are providing every other option across the 4 major sports.
Yesterday
at 03:25:10 AM
Daddy
:
If there is a demand. #LIVE will meet it. Site traffic is climbing. Site membership. Reputation. Interests. Its far from where it could be.
Yesterday
at 03:27:02 AM
Daddy
:
We are providing something nobody else is providing. Once these teams are gone... Grown Men throw public fits trying to get in. Yo... I aint lying.
Yesterday
at 03:29:02 AM
STLBlues91
:
Ill be around all day for any trade talks
Yesterday
at 01:45:38 PM
Daddy
:
NBA talking expansion now
multiple groups bidding in Las Vegas and Seattle's legislation has already approved a team once the Kraken came in.
Yesterday
at 06:49:07 PM
Daddy
:
Imagine that
Yesterday
at 06:49:28 PM
Daddy
:
They looking at 2 years before expansion. But its coming. Vegas has like 5 groups two of which plan to break ground on new venues. The expansion fee is expected to be north of 5 Billion $$
Yesterday
at 06:51:25 PM
Daddy
:
We did it here first. Remember that in two years when the NBA steals our Vegas name too
Yesterday
at 06:52:13 PM
Rhino7
:
We need a royalty payment if they steal the Vipers name
Yesterday
at 08:54:14 PM
Daddy
:
Blues hasnt said he wants to keep that name.
Yesterday
at 10:35:01 PM
Daddy
:
He is taking this naming very seriously which i appreciate.
Yesterday
at 10:35:49 PM
Daddy
:
It has to be a blast being a new expansion team in an NBA Dynasty league.
Yesterday
at 10:36:19 PM
Daddy
:
Who has ever done that?
Yesterday
at 10:36:41 PM
STLBlues91
:
I have a list of names on my phone currently
Yesterday
at 10:36:42 PM
STLBlues91
:
May do a poll or something for the gms of the league
Yesterday
at 10:37:01 PM
Daddy
:
Vipers is ok but it doesn't say "Vegas" to me. There are more creative names to be sure.
Yesterday
at 10:39:01 PM
Daddy
:
I don't know that the other GMs will care so much as you or I.
Yesterday
at 10:39:49 PM
Alpha5
:
Las Vegas Realtors
Yesterday
at 10:40:23 PM
Daddy
:
Sure, throw some in the chat
Yesterday
at 10:41:02 PM
dbreer23
:
Vegas Rat Pack
Yesterday
at 10:42:39 PM
Daddy
:
I like the Las Vegas Diamonds but i was saving that one for MLB LIVE expansion.
Yesterday
at 10:42:41 PM
STLBlues91
:
Legacy/Jokers/Sinners/Vengeance/Outlaws/Vipers/Vandals/Voodoo/have more but just threw out a couple I have written down
Yesterday
at 10:44:14 PM
Daddy
:
Las Vegas Diddlers (shout out to Bad Boy Records)
Yesterday
at 10:45:06 PM
Alpha5
:
Dammit
Yesterday
at 10:49:15 PM
Alpha5
:
Haha
Yesterday
at 10:49:19 PM
Alpha5
:
Las Vegas Impersonators
Yesterday
at 10:51:19 PM
Daddy
:
That long fuqn name? It would rap around they jerseys like a hula hoop.
Yesterday
at 10:52:48 PM
Daddy
:
Who you play for dawg?
Yesterday
at 10:54:07 PM
Daddy
:
"Uh.... We the imgddyojgsspersonators"
Yesterday
at 10:54:26 PM
Alpha5
:
Lolol
Yesterday
at 11:47:00 PM
Rhino7
:
Las Vegas Sin
Today
at 12:27:33 AM
STLBlues91
:
Im around for the next few hours to talk any deals
Today
at 01:53:58 AM