Author Topic: RC Decision - rule proposal  (Read 3319 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2012, 01:15:22 PM »
Corey, see my point about NBA Futures.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2012, 01:20:25 PM »
Is this possible to manually edit the total points scored in a week in Fantrax? The fairest way to calculating pitching points for any team over the innings limit would be:

Adjusted Pitching Point = Total Pitching Point * 65 / Innings pitched for the week

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2012, 01:28:26 PM »
ThE fact of the matter is that the rule is 65 IP... end of story. Because Fantrax has a loophole doesn't make it right. When you break a rule it is considered cheating. Now the question is what is fair punishment?
Corey, busy may be a viable excuse, but I have seen people watch over their rosters like a bird is about to hatch. Plus it isn't preposterous, I have a league that has a similar rule.
Mike if you are sitting at 60 plus innings going into Sunday, then you shouldn't be starting anyone. It's called roster management. And this is the argument as to why we are not a weekly league, BC we want to manage our line ups.
Now we have 3 suggestions... Forfeit, loss of points for an entire day, or what Colby is suggesting. Going over in innings is not an oversight when it happens every week
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2012, 01:36:36 PM »
Just thought of this as another way to resolve things:

Suppose a team has 60 innings pitched heading into last day, SP1 went for 6 innings, SP2 went for 7 innings and SP3 went for 3 innings on Sunday. Arrange the 3 SPs from the most innings pitched to the least innings pitched, and then bench them until the team falls below 65. In this case, SP1 and SP2 would both be benched and the team is left with 63 innings pitched.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2012, 02:09:14 PM »
New Era has a hard cap. Once you hit it, fantrax stops counting points
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2012, 06:34:33 PM »
As long as you are under the cap at the end of scoring on Saturday, you can throw as many innings as you like on Sunday...

My proposal is this then...

50 points deducted for every inning over the limit...

Howe as per your suggestion, I don't think that will work because it will take too much time, and could be considered baby sitting.

Anyone else have suggestions I am all ears, but this is something that needs to be taken care of. As I said previously the rule is in place, and there is a very exploitable loop hole. I would like to have this taken care of by the end of this scoring period.

Thank you
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2486
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2012, 06:49:13 PM »
I fully support the 65 IP rule, but I think it is too much of an imposition to ask people to calculate how many innings they have left on Sunday before the lineups lock or try to guess how many IP their starters will get on Sunday if they are under the innings limit going into the last day.  I am pretty sure that everyone on the RC knew the Fantrax limitations when we voted on the 65 IP rule, because I specifically asked the question myself on the public forum.  Therefore, I vote to leave things as is, and let Fantrax handle this as best it can without any human intervention or penalties.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2012, 07:02:08 PM »
1. If you are at 60 IP it's not quantum physics...
2. Why I wanted a start limit
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2012, 07:09:12 PM »
The loophole has been there since last year, so I don't know why we want to start using such a harsh penalty now.

Fantrax does have the capability of adjusting scoring in a given week and it looks pretty flexible. My vote is for if the IP goes over the limit, then

 penalty = Total Pitching Points for the week * (Total Innings Pitched - 65) / Total Innings Pitched.

This is the fairest solution. The penalty amount is equal to exactly the amount of scoring excess of 65 innings pitched. Dan I know it's not rocket science when a team is at 60 IP heading into the final day, but what if the team has only 50 innings pitched and 3 starters going on Sunday?
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 07:11:32 PM by h4cheng »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2012, 07:14:44 PM »
What if a team has 12 mil to spend and there is a FA going for 10? Same principle. Just because there is a ceiling doesn't mean you have to touch it
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Setting up leagues from scratch takes a little time. Took a few months to get NHL set up correctly and operational.
    Yesterday at 04:52:25 PM
  • Daddy: MLB & NFL were switch over leagues. They already had most of the structures in place. NHL is the first true LIVE league done from scratch.
    Yesterday at 04:53:51 PM
  • STLBlues91: When do you need Vegas name for NBA Live?
    Yesterday at 04:56:01 PM
  • Daddy: When i set up fantrax. Need the name and logo by then. Seattle was easy. Vegas we are on our own.
    Yesterday at 04:58:58 PM
  • Daddy: So by July 1
    Yesterday at 04:59:31 PM
  • Daddy: NBA is "easiest" of all of the leagues to set up and moderate.
    Yesterday at 05:00:09 PM
  • Daddy: NHL watch a bitch. All those dudes. I know about guys playing hockey in Iceland now. Too much information.
    Yesterday at 05:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Yesterday at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Yesterday at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Yesterday at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Yesterday at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Yesterday at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Yesterday at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Yesterday at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Yesterday at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Yesterday at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Yesterday at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: @Daddy can you check the message I just sent. Quick question
    Yesterday at 09:14:25 PM
  • Daddy: Replied
    Yesterday at 09:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: If members do not mind, deleting old pms helps the site run smoother and keeps your pms organized.
    Yesterday at 10:07:23 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gets more pms than i do. I stay deleting and still have pages and pages of pms
    Yesterday at 10:08:11 PM
  • Daddy: Its not required that you delete old news but its also not required you delete and spam emails. Same thing. Thanks!
    Yesterday at 10:09:35 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone wants one of these premium Flyers prospects, send me more pms to eventually delete. NFL/MLB/NHL you're welcome. On to the next LIVE chapters.
    Yesterday at 10:11:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Thank you for the Prune message sections.
    Yesterday at 10:20:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp that was an easy axe of messages
    Yesterday at 10:53:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I did happen to select 225 pages before I saw that option though
    Yesterday at 10:55:07 PM
  • Daddy: Man you had 225 pages? Damn. Im down to 12.
    Yesterday at 11:48:59 PM
  • Daddy: Some of them i have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:49:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I had 465 but I clicked 225 pages worth of messages before I found the prune option
    Yesterday at 11:50:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats a ton of trade talks. You just recently became a moderator. Being a mod we communicate tons via pm.
    Yesterday at 11:50:51 PM
  • Daddy: Your 465 pages was 400+ of trade negotiations. In pages containing 20 threads each. . :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:52:00 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I talk a lot of players and deals
    Yesterday at 11:52:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: And the other 65 were draft reminders and otc messages
    Yesterday at 11:52:50 PM
  • Daddy: I bet you pruned some moderator Crap :rofl: some of them you have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:52:59 PM
  • Daddy: I always resend the important stuff.
    Yesterday at 11:53:35 PM
  • STLBlues91: No I kept all messages within like 80 days
    Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah you got it all anyway. Im just here to type and plug in numbers
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: There is a new NCAA football team. TCU in the house.
    Yesterday at 11:54:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: When does NCAA open and all that
    Yesterday at 11:55:15 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE just added another all star level GM. We are getting him up to speed. No not the one in Detroit.
    Yesterday at 11:55:31 PM
  • Daddy: July 1st
    Yesterday at 11:55:43 PM
  • Daddy: Where are we at? Somewhere around 50 teams i think. We have 64 but bringing them onboard profsl is a challenge.
    Yesterday at 11:56:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Ill get to work more on that spread sheet like June 10th. Finishing touches on NHL then a few days off then will knock that out
    Yesterday at 11:56:47 PM
  • Daddy: So much easier. No contracts. No trades.
    Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
  • jmntl82: I can’t stand the Detroit GM
    Yesterday at 11:59:19 PM
  • jmntl82: Keeps me up at night
    Yesterday at 11:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah the colors will take a bit as I find the rbg codes and thats 64 teams. I can copy and paste the makeup. Then just to plug in the players
    Today at 12:07:48 AM