Author Topic: Padres and Latos reach $35m extension.  (Read 515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Padres and Latos reach $35m extension.
« on: March 19, 2012, 01:16:58 PM »
At long last the Padres would like to extend Mat Latos using the prospect extension clause.  I believe this would begin next season.  The math looks like this:

Mat Latos was 25th best in 2011 and 28th overall in 2010 (amongst SP).  25th best SP is due 11m.  With the Prospect Extension
2013 - 4.4 = 5m
2014 - 5.5 = 6m
2015 - 6.6 = 7m
2016 - 7.7 = 8m
2017 - 7.7 = 8m

What a deal for a 2 on most teams and still has potential!
« Last Edit: March 19, 2012, 11:19:28 PM by joeshmoe »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2012, 01:23:58 PM »
Prospect extensions must have flat annual salaries.  You will take the $11m and multiply it by a factor.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2012, 01:33:00 PM »
Prospect extensions must have flat annual salaries.  You will take the $11m and multiply it by a factor.

I know, and I did that.  10% of 11m is 1.1m  So if you subtract 60% in the first year you would do 11m - 6.6m = 4.4 rounded up = 5m
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2012, 04:03:53 PM »
Only a single factor gets applied to the market value which in this case is 60%
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2012, 04:58:42 PM »
Only a single factor gets applied to the market value which in this case is 60%

Why 60%?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline nerwffej

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6324
  • Bonus inPoints: 6
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2012, 05:14:17 PM »
Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension (see below), but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.  The resulting annual salary must be no less than $4m.  No matter what the current prospect contract is, the prospect extension kicks in the following year at the rate based on when the contract is given.

For the 20XX season, the following percentages would be used per prospect status.

20XX - 60%
20XX+1 - 50%
20XX+2 - 40%
20XX+3, n/a - 30%

There is a window after the season in which the multipliers above are still in effect.  This was a rule effective June 16th, 2011 for expiring prospect contracts.  Prospect extensions on expired prospect contracts will be the only type of extensions allowable for expired contracts in the offseason.  Therefore, after the 2011 regular season is over, a P-2011 contract is still eligible for the prospect extension at the 2011 rate.  This window for prospect extensions is open until one week prior to the beginning of offseason free agency.

Latos in last year of prospect is elgible for 60% discount
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2012, 05:16:31 PM »
Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension (see below), but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.  The resulting annual salary must be no less than $4m.  No matter what the current prospect contract is, the prospect extension kicks in the following year at the rate based on when the contract is given.

For the 20XX season, the following percentages would be used per prospect status.

20XX - 60%
20XX+1 - 50%
20XX+2 - 40%
20XX+3, n/a - 30%

There is a window after the season in which the multipliers above are still in effect.  This was a rule effective June 16th, 2011 for expiring prospect contracts.  Prospect extensions on expired prospect contracts will be the only type of extensions allowable for expired contracts in the offseason.  Therefore, after the 2011 regular season is over, a P-2011 contract is still eligible for the prospect extension at the 2011 rate.  This window for prospect extensions is open until one week prior to the beginning of offseason free agency.

Latos in last year of prospect is elgible for 60% discount

so what will be the extension?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline MillerTime

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 7697
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2012, 05:25:18 PM »
so what will be the extension?

If the 11m is correct on his ranking.

= 11 * .60 = $6.6m (2017)

He will remain at $0.5m in 2012.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson

Offline nerwffej

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6324
  • Bonus inPoints: 6
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2012, 05:29:31 PM »
If the 11m is correct on his ranking.

= 11 * .60 = $6.6m (2017)

He will remain at $0.5m in 2012.

Asking so have right in my head also
Isn't it since on last year -60% so should be 4.5?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Paul S.

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 21987
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Padres and Latos reach $34m extension.
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2012, 05:37:44 PM »
$11m is the correct amount x 60% = $6.6m rounded to $6.5m from 2013-2017.  2012 will remain $0.5m (P-2012).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Both you and @TheGoat. I hope yall enjoyed your trip. Got to take in the lights and sounds. Cuz im due and im coming to collect. See you in September.
    Yesterday at 08:50:11 PM
  • Braves155: Will be around for talks tonight
    Yesterday at 08:50:16 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill see you in September but I will look forward to still being around late December
    Yesterday at 08:51:51 PM
  • Braves155: Just settling in now, about to cook some dinner
    Yesterday at 08:52:05 PM
  • Daddy: @Braves tries harder than anyone. Never afraid to take risks, never afraid to negotiate. Probably too easy going IMO. Talk about effort.. you talking @Braves155
    Yesterday at 08:52:22 PM
  • Daddy: Any league i run you have a seat at the table if you want one.
    Yesterday at 08:53:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: braves and i have made some good trades in past
    Yesterday at 08:53:51 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy - Countless teams have inquired about Pacheco. I like the idea of building around him and the eventual 1.1 pick
    Yesterday at 08:54:33 PM
  • Braves155: My D is coming together as well with some nice young pieces
    Yesterday at 08:55:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: lmaooo i think i did ask abt him too braves
    Yesterday at 08:55:13 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i totally understand u wanting to build w him
    Yesterday at 08:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: Do YOUR thing @Braves, im a huge fan. It took Brian 12 years to become competitive. But man does Brian try hard.
    Yesterday at 08:55:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I was one of them that inquired as well before I moved my 3 first
    Yesterday at 08:56:55 PM
  • Daddy: Effort > Talent
    Yesterday at 08:57:07 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: some reason i am able to turn things in 1-2 yrs
    Yesterday at 08:58:28 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i guess its my dilligence and patience
    Yesterday at 08:58:43 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I just sold my first year when taking over as I didnt have the roster. After my first season I ended up with 3 of the top 8 picks. Lots of luck and trades to be where I am going into year 3
    Yesterday at 09:00:06 PM
  • Braves155: IN NFL LIVE a player with any type role on a team can contribute & add value. After the 1st week of FA look at the FA wire...there will only be scraps
    Yesterday at 09:09:26 PM
  • Braves155: I also think this is a top-heavy, but deep Draft.
    Yesterday at 09:10:21 PM
  • Daddy: Big NFL LIVE trade. Who is sleeping? While you slept Brian has gone out and made a power move.
    Yesterday at 09:51:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nice move to recpoup
    Yesterday at 10:18:36 PM
  • Rhino7: @Daddy, thanks for what you said lol. It was the ultimate challenge to beat JWalkerjr88 last season, I wanted my path to go through him so it makes my title run that much better! I just wanted to get to the SB and figured at that point anything can happen and lucky for me, my boys had enough left to take out BAB. Live is the most challenging league I’m in and most fun, so thanks for what you all do to make it that way.
    Yesterday at 10:28:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Rhino that was a pretty close final too i think
    Yesterday at 10:41:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: eitrher than or i had somekey players not perfoem well at all regardless great win by u
    Yesterday at 10:43:31 PM
  • Rhino7: Appreciate it, your team is solid. I expect to see you make another run
    Yesterday at 10:46:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You did well Rhino. I appreciate the battle. The loss didnt sting more because i was undefeated, i know fully that being undefeated in the reg season doesnt mean anything in the playoffs. When rhino and i played this past season, the better team won.
    Yesterday at 10:58:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This next year im coming full force. So far my pattern is win a chip every other year. Lets keep the streak going!!
    Yesterday at 10:58:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im coming back too
    Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: lets see if my team performs like last yr
    Yesterday at 11:02:10 PM
  • Daddy: Well.. if im undefeated heading into the NFC Title game & I lose. I may beat up my neighbor. I dont like that guy anyway.
    Yesterday at 11:07:13 PM
  • Daddy: I hate losing. Especially when its the biggest moments. I hate my teams i root for to lose. I really hate for the teams i built myself to lose.
    Yesterday at 11:08:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont like losing ever. But a loss is a loss. Im pissed either way
    Yesterday at 11:09:47 PM
  • Braves155: Are you also a perfectionist in your everyday life?
    Yesterday at 11:10:05 PM
  • Daddy: Im not a perfectionist in my dynasty life. I make all kinds of bad trades and make all kinds of mistakes.
    Yesterday at 11:10:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If i traded all my picks to a division rival in a rebuild and he beat me in the title game with Desmond ridder or lose undefeated. Its all a loss at the end of the day
    Yesterday at 11:11:08 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody is right all the time. Its the beauty of sports.
    Yesterday at 11:11:13 PM
  • Daddy: Beat me with Desmond Ridder and i trade for Desmond Ridder.
    Yesterday at 11:11:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You playing chess not checkers lol
    Yesterday at 11:13:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Rhino beat me with goff and then traded goff
    Yesterday at 11:13:44 PM
  • Daddy: It helps to know sports but ive signed guys ive never heard of like SP Dallas Kuechel. Nobody knew who he was. I saw he earned a spot. I took a chance. A couple years later the dude wins the Cy Young.
    Yesterday at 11:14:05 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: 3 out of the 4 starting QBs in the title games have been traded this offseason
    Yesterday at 11:14:21 PM
  • Daddy: I think i had him on a prospect deal.
    Yesterday at 11:14:22 PM
  • Daddy: It helps just to fill up your roster and sign good contracts. If you dont know crap but keep a full roster and manage finances, you will kick ass.
    Yesterday at 11:15:26 PM
  • Daddy: I wasnt a genius signing Kuechel. I was just filling an empty spot. I got rewarded with the best pitcher in baseball for a few seasons.
    Yesterday at 11:16:59 PM
  • Braves155: I love it when one of your Dynasty teams you've been rebuilding starts showing up and being competitive early in the season. Especially in baseball
    Yesterday at 11:19:42 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I'm decent at building, but I need to get better st winning.  I did win an offsite 32-team football league, it only took me 1.5 season to rebuild and win.
    Yesterday at 11:25:50 PM
  • Daddy: Thats what you should be doing @Brent. LIVE sharpens those skills so you can go elsewhere and dominate unsuspecting leagues.
    Today at 12:01:29 AM
  • Daddy: I use the same screen name on every site. So the sites I'm visiting/competing, know who is putting foots to them.
    Today at 12:02:47 AM
  • Daddy: And they know where they can find me. Along with the growing list of LIVE GMs who would put more foots to them.
    Today at 12:03:48 AM
  • Daddy: If "Daddy" appears on your site. He wears a size 13 and you know it.
    Today at 12:04:44 AM