0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Not that tough?Mets have the worst record, so would have first dibs on MazzaroThen the Marlins have the next best, so they'd get KilaThen I was the only one to put a bid in on O'Sullivan, so he's mine.Makes sense, no?
Actually the Marlins had the worst record 72-90Mets went 77-85Marlins would get both Mazzaro and KilaBlueJays get O'sullivan.
Yes, I just clearly can't read today However, in the same claiming period (which would reset monthly), the team should go to the end of the line, no?Otherwise the worst teams could get all the players.
According to page 9 of the constitutionWaivers Priority OrderThe order in which organization may claim players off waivers is by winning percentage,beginning with the lowest. Waivers during the off-season will use the previous season’s winningpercentage. The order is not reset if an organization makes a waiver claim.I believe the idea is to help build the worst teams.
I dont really like this rule. As in the "crappy" teams would always get the picks. Just my 2 cents.
You are dropping someone from your 40 man roster for someone you believe is better,correct...Do you really believe that the "crappy" teams will have such a great advantage due to that. If you have someone you believe is going to make such a huge difference, why would you want to remove them?
The worst team gets first dibs at ANYONE dropped, that's not an advantage?