0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Read my last proposal again. I simply proposed that we limit the release of high-priced players. Interested teams would then have the cap room to make a fair market bid in the off-season. Teams could cut such players from 8/22 (FA has ended) to the start oif the regular season. Is that really such an unfair restriction on rebuilding teams?
We should just limit it from the other direction, that player can not be signed until FA starts. If AROD goes to jail tomorrow for five years, more of an NFL scenario, for his role in gambling ring, we can't say Corey can't drop him. I don't think that we should control any team from dropping someone, we just restrict the ability for a new team to pay under market value for such a player. Proposal any player making more than $15m in a year and dropped must be resigned to the same contract, if signed. If not the player would remain in the pool until FA comes along after the season. It is a good point, just need to limit what your point is, not restrict a GM from a legal action. Just my opinion.
I like the direction this is going. Instead of picking the arbitrary 15M, how about this: any player must be signed to a contract greater than or equal to its current market value (using 2 year average like it's done for extensions) after the trading deadline?
I don't like the idea of preventing the release of players or restricting FA. This may be a point at which we have to allow cases to happen where a once expensive player receives a cheaper contract. One point to make is that teams will find a way to free up more cap space if they want one of these stars. If A-Rod was released, and the max cap available to any team was $5m, I would be shocked to see a team not push an offer to $10m/year by releasing several prospect contracts and other players. Waivers adds more chance for a team to release cap space.
What if we just sync up the cost savings deadline with the FA deadline? That should avoid the issue without adding any complexity...