Author Topic: Reds/ Tigers trade  (Read 1516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Reds/ Tigers trade
« on: February 13, 2010, 12:56:46 AM »
Reds get

OF Snider, Travis, $0.5m (P-2012)

Tigers get

OF Johnny Damon, $5.5 (2010)
P Cahill, Trevor, $0.5m (P-2012)
P Cordero, Francisco, $11.5m (2011)
1st Round Pick - 9th overall

Tigers to confirm
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline nerwffej

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6324
  • Bonus inPoints: 6
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2010, 12:58:53 AM »
i agree that is the agreed deal
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12554
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2010, 10:13:16 PM »
If I am to approve a trade strictly on the basis of collusion or other means of cheating then I approve. I know that this is a legitimate trade.
The reason I have hesitated this long is that I question it's fairness. I'm sorry but I believe it is grossly imbalanced in favor of the Tigers. That said, I feel that I can't just "rubber stamp" this transaction. Doing so would only minimize my position on the TCC.
If I'm out of line let me know. Otherwise, I'm affraid I need further justification before I can approve. Sorry.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline nerwffej

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6324
  • Bonus inPoints: 6
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2010, 10:44:52 PM »
it does lean towards me in a way but i took on a huge contract or cordero and for me to do it i had to get something to make it worth while. just my reason i had to get what i did to do deal.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2010, 11:59:42 PM »
My justification for doing this is...

1. I get a young stud hitter in Snider which was my main goal - and the best player in the trade. He is also oneof the youngest people in the majors.
2. I get rid of Cordero - paying 11 mil to someone who doesn't score that differently than other rps is ridiculous in my mind.Plus he is 35
3. Damon - was a 1 year rental and he would have been gone next year.
4. Cahill hurts to give up, but see #1
5. Pick - didn't care in being part of the draft
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12554
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2010, 12:45:51 AM »
Sorry Dan but, in my opinion, this trade is way too one-sided.
But.....opinions are like a**holes, everybody's got one. And,since I'm not sure of the perimeters required in sanctioning a trade, I'll approve.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2010, 01:43:18 AM »
Sorry Dan but, in my opinion, this trade is way too one-sided.
But.....opinions are like a**holes, everybody's got one. And,since I'm not sure of the perimeters required in sanctioning a trade, I'll approve.

As an RC member I'll throw out what my interpretation of the rules are:
In general, if you think both teams are acting in the best interest of their teams (whether you agree with the balance of trade or not) considering either short term or long term implications (allowing each GM the freedom to set their goals), and you have no reason to suspect the involved GM's of collusion, then you're free to approve the trade (and should do so). 

In any cases where you may hesitate to approve (based on the above conditions), you should absolutely request the involved GM's offer some indications into why they agreed to the trade.  Upon reply, if you're able to interpret their arguments as genuine reasons for making the transaction then you should approve the deal (again, even if personally you do not agree on the valuation).

I invite other RC members and active GM's to add to this, as the TC is an extremely important committee and all league owners should be on the same page with respect to it's responsibilities and reach of power.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2486
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2010, 02:51:27 PM »
I don't believe that we need a TC if the only reason for rejecting a trade is collusion.  The commissioner could make that ruling himself.  If we want a TC with real "teeth" and acting in the best interests of the league itself, then we should amend the rules if the rules really declare that collusion is the only grounds for rejecting trades.  Trades in a dynasty league have long-term implications, so we should really take long look at this topic.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

lp815

  • Guest
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2010, 09:37:48 PM »
Going off of Ben's request, I'll put in my cents...

I see all of Dan's points as acceptable, except the draft pick.  While there's nothing in the rules on how each member values their players/picks (and there shouldn't be), it might upset GM's to see a trade where a pick is traded simply because the GM didn't want to be in the draft.  It makes it appear as if it was dumped off, with no real validity to it's value (any value) on the GM's part.

I'll wait to see if any of the other TC members chime in before us RC members use a vote, but maybe give a bit better explanation on the draft pick, Dan-o?  Was the pick necessary for the Tigers to accept?  If it wasn't, possibly seeing it removed might make the members a bit more comfortable in seeing this trade go through.  However, that won't change my opinion of the trade vote wise, as Rick nailed it on that we are really only employed to look for collusion and cheating, not valuing players/picks.

My two cents, gentlemen. :koolaid:

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline nerwffej

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6324
  • Bonus inPoints: 6
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Reds/ Tigers trade
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2010, 10:06:14 PM »
as per draft pick
yes it was necessary when we started talking trade i was taking on a 11.5 mil contract and a pick was being offered  for someone to take it so we just worked other parts to deal around that
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Oh nvm you made two NHL Trades
    Yesterday at 08:51:36 PM
  • Braves155: Already 2 deals Brian?
    Yesterday at 09:12:52 PM
  • Daddy: He needs help @Braves. Trade addiction hotline. He just doesn't love Fakebook or TicTok. Brian is addicted to trading.
    Yesterday at 09:39:23 PM
  • Daddy: "1-800-LIVEGMS" - is here for your addiction.
    Yesterday at 09:41:08 PM
  • Daddy: We got Fat traders... Skinny traders... We got wee little traders & Giant ego traders. Our slogan? "We be trading Crap nonstop".
    Yesterday at 09:43:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 10:13:45 PM
  • Braves155: Replied
    Yesterday at 11:00:36 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Daddy message on fantrax
    Today at 02:29:05 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 09:08:41 AM
  • TheGOAT: Are you posting jmntl?
    Today at 10:42:38 AM
  • TheGOAT: nevermind
    Today at 10:46:33 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Which 2025 1st is being moved? Im assuming Detroit original
    Today at 10:53:10 AM
  • TheGOAT: I believe it is the Detroit's original one
    Today at 11:05:54 AM
  • jmntl82: Yeah the original
    Today at 11:24:30 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Roger
    Today at 11:54:51 AM
  • Daddy: Welp... There goes my draft picks boyz. Hit me up next year. :)
    Today at 12:45:22 PM
  • jmntl82: Is there a trade addiction meeting somewhere I can sign up for?
    Today at 01:02:23 PM
  • jmntl82: It has been one hour ish since my last trade
    Today at 01:02:36 PM
  • Daddy: Looking at our recent transactions you too need therapy. The trade addiction pandemic is real.
    Today at 01:04:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Lmaoo I think I got the case of briantradeitis
    Today at 02:38:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: After what Ive been doing in NHL live
    Today at 02:38:18 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around all day. Will be on the SS later doing some matching but always around
    Today at 02:39:13 PM
  • Daddy: We havent hit the official start date but NHL LIVE is up and running, fully functional with 28 pre-signed owners. Weve got 4 open teams despite over 100,000+ views on just the bullpen sign up sheet.
    Today at 02:46:34 PM
  • Daddy: Once teams are gone, they are gone.
    Today at 02:47:29 PM
  • Daddy: Focus now goes to NCAA LIVE >> NBA LIVE >> NCAA Hoops LIVE
    Today at 02:48:24 PM
  • Daddy: Thats 160 teams in case you were wondering. Across 2 sports. Impossible? Just watch.
    Today at 02:49:56 PM
  • OUDAN: Soooooo ready for NCAA and NBA. Ive never been in an NCAA league that worked but I trust you
    Today at 03:00:41 PM
  • Daddy: And i will not let you down sir. On my everything i will not let you down. :toth:
    Today at 03:34:14 PM
  • Bigdon: Has nba live started yet
    Today at 04:45:48 PM
  • Daddy: You will see it in fantrax once it starts. We are at the "pre" signup stage. Just got the boards up.
    Today at 04:50:52 PM
  • Daddy: Setting up leagues from scratch takes a little time. Took a few months to get NHL set up correctly and operational.
    Today at 04:52:25 PM
  • Daddy: MLB & NFL were switch over leagues. They already had most of the structures in place. NHL is the first true LIVE league done from scratch.
    Today at 04:53:51 PM
  • STLBlues91: When do you need Vegas name for NBA Live?
    Today at 04:56:01 PM
  • Daddy: When i set up fantrax. Need the name and logo by then. Seattle was easy. Vegas we are on our own.
    Today at 04:58:58 PM
  • Daddy: So by July 1
    Today at 04:59:31 PM
  • Daddy: NBA is "easiest" of all of the leagues to set up and moderate.
    Today at 05:00:09 PM
  • Daddy: NHL watch a bitch. All those dudes. I know about guys playing hockey in Iceland now. Too much information.
    Today at 05:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Today at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Today at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Today at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Today at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Today at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Today at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Today at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Today at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Today at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Today at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Today at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Today at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Today at 06:14:34 PM